| CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER | |
| CITATION: | Vikuckis v Lion-Dairy & Drinks Pty Ltd [2024] NSWPIC 501 |
| APPLICANT: | Christopher Vikuckis |
| RESPONDENT: | Lion-Dairy & Drinks Pty Ltd |
| MEMBER: | John Isaksen |
| DATE OF DECISION: | 10 September 2024 |
| CATCHWORDS: | WORKERS COMPENSATION - Personal Injury Commission Act 2020; section 57(1); application for reconsideration of Certificate of Determination (COD); Samuel v Sebel Furniture Limited referred to; whether there has been a deterioration in the worker’s condition that results in an increase in permanent impairment and/or additional relevant information not previously available; Riverina Wines Pty Ltd v Registrar of the Workers Compensation Commission & Ors and Petrovic v BC Service No 14 Pty Limited and Ors referred to; Held – medical evidence supports a deterioration in the worker’s condition; there is additional relevant information that was not previously available; COD revoked. |
| DETERMINATIONS MADE: | The Commission orders: 1. The Certificate of Determination dated 15 January 2021 is revoked pursuant to s 57 (1) of the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020. 2. The matter is remitted to the President to determine: (a) if the grounds for appeal specified in s 327 (3)(a) or (b) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 has been satisfied; and, if so (b) whether this matter can be referred for a further assessment of permanent impairment as an alternative to an appeal as provided for by s 329 (1) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998. |
STATEMENT OF REASONS
BACKGROUND
The applicant in these proceedings, Christopher Vikuckis, sustained an injury to his left wrist due to repetitive lifting, a consequential condition affecting his right wrist, and an injury to the left knee due to constant walking up and down stairs, while employed as a warehouse operator with the respondent, Lion-Dairy & Drinks Pty Ltd.
The respondent admits liability for these injuries.
Dr Assem, Approved Medical Specialist, issued a Medical Assessment Certificate (MAC) on 7 December 2020 which assessed the applicant as having 12% whole person impairment (WPI) for a deemed date of injury of 2 May 2019, being the date of the claim made by the applicant for a lump sum payment pursuant to s 66 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (the 1987 Act). The assessment of WPI made by Dr Assem was assessed as follows:
· right upper extremity (wrist) 8%;
· left upper extremity (wrist) 2%;
· left lower extremity (knee) 2%, and
· scarring 0%.
The assessment of permanent impairment of both wrists was based upon range of motion.
The Workers Compensation Commission issued a Certificate of Determination (COD) on
15 January 2021 as follows:“The Commission determines:
1. The respondent pay the applicant, as lump sum compensation under section 66 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987, $26,900, in respect of 12% permanent impairment resulting from injury on 2 May 2019.
Brief statement of reasons
2. This Certificate of Determination is issued in accordance with the Medical Assessment Certificate issued under Part 7 of Chapter 7 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Vikuckis v Lion-Dairy & Drinks Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] NSWPIC 501
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether there had been a deterioration in the worker’s condition and whether there was additional relevant information not previously available that warranted a reconsideration of the COD. The legal principles to be applied were derived from the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020, specifically section 57(1), and relevant case law including Samuel v Sebel Furniture Limited, Riverina Wines Pty Ltd v Registrar of the Workers Compensation Commission & Ors, and Petrovic v BC Service No 14 Pty Limited and Ors. The court had to assess the medical evidence presented and consider whether it supported a finding of deterioration and whether this constituted new information that warranted a reconsideration of the COD.
The court found that the medical evidence did support a deterioration in the worker’s condition and that there was additional relevant information that had not been previously available. The court noted that the evidence demonstrated changes in the worker's physical state and the impact on his ability to perform work, which were not previously considered. The court was persuaded by the reasoning in Samuel v Sebel Furniture Limited and the principles established in Riverina Wines and Petrovic. Consequently, the court decided that the COD should be revoked, and the matter would be remitted back to the Commission for reassessment.
The court ordered that the Certificate of Determination be revoked and that the matter be remitted back to the Personal Injury Commission for reassessment in light of the new evidence and information presented.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.