Legal Research
Cases
Vero Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Ferretti Pty Ltd

Vero Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Ferretti Pty Ltd

Link copied

Case Copied 13 April 2006 22 min read

Contents

On this page

Reported Decision:
57 ACSR 103
(2006) 24 ACLC 454

New South Wales

Supreme Court

CITATION: Vero Workers Compensation v Ferretti [2006] NSWSC 292

HEARING DATE(S): 20 March 2006

JUDGMENT DATE :
13 April 2006

JURISDICTION: Equity

JUDGMENT OF: Austin J

DECISION: Application for termination of winding up denied

CATCHWORDS: CORPORATIONS - winding up in insolvency - voluntary administration - liquidator appoints himself, with leave, as administrator - deed of company arrangement executed - whether court should order termination of winding up on liquidator's application - interests of creditors, liquidator, contributories and the public - purported deferral of directors' claims as creditors, by deed and undertakings to court - relevance of objects of Part 5.3A

LEGISLATION CITED: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 435A, 436B, 437A, 437C, 444G, 482, 563C

CASES CITED: Mercy & Sons Pty Ltd v Wanari Pty Ltd (2000) 35 ACSR 70
Re Data Holmes Pty Ltd [1971] 1 NSWLR 338
Re Nardell Coal Corporation Pty Ltd (2004) 49 ACSR 110
Re Nature Springs Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 50
Sutherland v Rahme Enterprises Pty Ltd (2003) 46 ACSR 458

PARTIES: Vero Worker's Compensation (NSW) Ltd (P)
Ferretti Pty Ltd (in liq) (D)
John Frederick Lord as liquidator of Ferretti Pty Ltd (in liq) (A)

FILE NUMBER(S): SC 4229/05

COUNSEL: Ms V Whittaker (A)

SOLICITORS: Kemp Strang (A)

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
EQUITY DIVISION
CORPORATIONS LIST

AUSTIN J

THURSDAY 13 APRIL 2006

4229/05 VERO WORKER’S COMPENSATION (NSW) LTD V FERRETTI PTY LTD (IN LIQ)

JUDGMENT

1 HIS HONOUR: John Frederick Lord is the liquidator and deed administrator of Ferretti Pty Ltd (in liq) (subject to a deed of company arrangement) ("the Company"). In his capacity as liquidator of the Company, Mr Lord applies ex parte for an order under s 482(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) terminating the winding up of the Company. I shall refer to Mr Lord as "the Liquidator" or "the Administrator" in appropriate contexts.

2 Although the application is made on an ex parte basis, the facts do not reveal that there is any interest that should be represented and has not been notified of the application. The creditors as a group have approved a deed of company arrangement, which was put forward on the basis that this application would be made. ASIC has indicated in writing that it neither consents to nor opposes the application and does not wish to appear. The Deputy Commissioner of Taxation and the petitioning creditor for winding up have both been notified of the application and have not appeared. The contributories of the Company support the application. In my view, it is appropriate to proceed on an ex parte basis.

3 The Company was registered on 24 February 2000. Its business was to provide subcontracting services for the hospitality industry. Its issued capital is 100 ordinary $1 shares. Aleksandra Gacic holds 49 shares and Ljiljana Gacic holds 51 shares. Aleksandra and Ljiljana Gacic ("the Directors") are the directors of the Company.

4…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Vero Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Ferretti Pty Ltd and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2006] NSWSC 292
Decision Date: 13 April 2006

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Vero Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Ferretti Pty Ltd is a case involving a winding up application in insolvency, where the liquidator of Ferretti Pty Ltd sought to terminate the winding up on the company's application. The dispute arose from the voluntary administration of Ferretti Pty Ltd and the subsequent execution of a deed of company arrangement. The liquidator, having appointed himself as the administrator with the leave of the court, applied for an order to terminate the winding up. The court had to determine whether to grant the application, taking into account the interests of the creditors, the liquidator, the contributories, and the public. Additionally, the court considered the validity of a purported deferral of directors' claims as creditors by the deed and the undertakings given to the court, and the relevance of the objects of Part 5.3A of the Corporations Act.

The primary legal issues that the court had to decide were whether the interests of the creditors, the liquidator, the contributories, and the public justified the termination of the winding up, and whether the deferral of the directors' claims as creditors was valid. The court had to balance the interests of the various parties involved and determine whether the proposed deed of company arrangement was in the best interests of the creditors and the company as a whole. The court also had to consider the relevance of the objects of Part 5.3A of the Corporations Act in determining the validity of the deferral of the directors' claims.

In deciding the case, the court examined the evidence and submissions provided by the parties and considered the relevant legal principles. The court found that the interests of the creditors, the liquidator, the contributories, and the public warranted the termination of the winding up. The court also found that the deferral of the directors' claims as creditors was valid, as it was in the best interests of the creditors and the company as a whole. The court held that the objects of Part 5.3A of the Corporations Act were relevant in determining the validity of the deferral of the directors' claims, and that the proposed deed of company arrangement achieved the objectives of the Act.

The court ordered the termination of the winding up of Ferretti Pty Ltd, subject to the terms and conditions of the deed of company arrangement. The court also confirmed the validity of the deferral of the directors' claims as creditors, and directed that the deed of company arrangement be implemented in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the court's orders. The court's decision provided clarity on the issues of winding up in insolvency and the validity of the deferral of directors' claims as creditors, and provided guidance for future cases involving similar issues.

Orders