Legal Research
Cases
Lollback v Brakepower Pty Ltd

Lollback v Brakepower Pty Ltd

Case [2010] NSWSC 1457 17 December 2010

Winding Up & Liquidation

Liquidator's Remuneration

Judicial Review

Corporate Law & Governance

Type to search within this case.

NEW SOUTH WALES SUPREME COURT

CITATION:
Lollback v Brakepower Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1457

JURISDICTION:
Equity Division
Corporations List

FILE NUMBER(S):
2010/18159

HEARING DATE(S):
16/11/10, 17/11/10

JUDGMENT DATE:
17 December 2010

PARTIES:
Mark Lollback - Plaintiff
Brakepower Pty Ltd - First Defendant
David Anthony Ross as liquidator of Brakepower Pty Ltd - Second Defedant

JUDGMENT OF:
Barrett J

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION:
Not Applicable

LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S):
Not Applicable

LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER:
Not Applicable

COUNSEL:
Mr G D McDonald
Mr A W Smith - Defendants

SOLICITORS:
J T Law - Plaintiff
MSB Lawyers - Defendants

CATCHWORDS:
CORPORATIONS - winding up by the court - liquidators - liquidator's remuneration determined by a registrar of the court - application by sole contributory for review of the registrar's decision - review sought only as to decision that there should be no order as to costs - approach to review of exercise of registrar's discretion - no basis for intervention shown - CORPORATIONS - liquidators - inquiry into liquidator's conduct - whether court should order - various complaints about liquidator's conduct - no basis to order inquiry shown

LEGISLATION CITED:
Civil Procedure Act, s 98(1)(a), (b).
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 468A(8), 471A(1A), 473(3), 473(6), 482, 536
Supreme Court Act 1970, s 121(3)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rule 49.19

CATEGORY:
Principal judgment

CASES CITED:
House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 ; [1936] HCA 40
Kennards Hire Pty Ltd v RMGA Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1387
Re SNL Group Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 797
Sellers; in the matter of Beckley Forge Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 523
State Debt Recovery Office v L and G Contracting Service Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1116
Tomko v Palasty (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 369; (2007) 71 NSWLR 61
Vero Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Ferretti Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 292 ; (2006) 57 ACSR 103

TEXTS CITED:

DECISION:

The plaintiff’s interlocutory process dated 16 July 2010 is dismissed with costs.
The application in paragraph 5 of the plaintiff’s amended originating process dated 16 July 2010 is dismissed with costs.

JUDGMENT:

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
EQUITY DIVISION
CORPORATIONS LIST

BARRETT J

FRIDAY, 17 DECEMBER 2010

2010/18159MARK LOLLBACK v BRAKEPOWER PTY LTD & ANOR

JUDGMENT

Parties and claims

The plaintiff, Mr Lollback, seeks two orders against Mr Ross, the liquidator of Brakepower Pty Ltd, a company subject to winding up by the court under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by virtue of an order made by the Supreme Court of Victoria on 2 September 2009.
Mr Lollback is the sole director and contributory of Brakepower.
Mr Lollback’s first claim (advanced by interlocutory process dated 16 July 2010) is for a review of a determination of a registrar with respect to Mr Ross’s remuneration as liquidator of Brakepower. Towards the end of the hearing, however, Mr McDonald of counsel indicated that that application was limited to review of the registrar’s decision concerning the costs of the remuneration application determined by him (the registrar ordered that…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Lollback v Brakepower Pty Ltd

Details

AGLC: Lollback v Brakepower Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1457
Case: [2010] NSWSC 1457
Decision Date: 17 December 2010

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Lollback v Brakepower Pty Ltd, the parties involved were Lollback, a contributory of the company Brakepower Pty Ltd, and the liquidators of the company, Brakepower Pty Ltd. The dispute centred around the determination of the liquidators' remuneration and the decision by the registrar of the court not to order any costs. Lollback sought a review of the registrar's decision, specifically challenging the decision not to order costs. The case was heard by the Federal Court of Australia.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the review of the registrar's decision was warranted and whether there was a basis to order an inquiry into the liquidators' conduct. The court needed to determine if there was any error in the exercise of the registrar's discretion regarding the decision not to order costs and if there was sufficient evidence to support an inquiry into the liquidators' conduct. The court also had to consider the appropriate standard of review applicable to the registrar's decision.

The Federal Court found that the review of the registrar's decision was not justified. The court held that the registrar's decision not to order costs was within their discretion and there was no demonstrated error or basis for intervention. The court further determined that there was no evidence to support the need for an inquiry into the liquidators' conduct. The complaints made by Lollback did not provide a sufficient basis for the court to order such an inquiry. Consequently, the court dismissed Lollback's application for review and did not order an inquiry into the liquidators' conduct.

Orders