District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Trajkovski v Ballgate Pty Limited [2018] NSWDC 308 Hearing dates: 16, 17, 18 October 2018 Date of orders: 26 October 2018 Decision date: 26 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for $43,681.20.
(2) Order the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs.
(3) Grant leave to the parties to approach my Associate within seven days if either party seeks a different costs order.Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – plaintiff stepped on broken glass at hotel causing injury to foot
TORTS – negligence – duty – risk of harm – foreseeability – risk not insignificant – precautions against risk of harm – burden of taking precautions – causation
DAMAGES – non-economic loss – past out-of-pocket expenses – past economic loss and future loss of earning capacityLegislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Cases Cited: Adeels Palace Pty Limited v Moubarak [2009] HCA 48; (2009) 239 CLR 420
Australian Safeways Stores Pty Limited v Zaluzna [1987] HCA 7; (1987) 162 CLR 479
Benmax v Austin Motor Co Limited [1955] AC 370
Bunnings Group Ltd v Giudice [2018] NSWCA 144
Derrick v Cheung [2001] HCA 48; (2001) 181 ALR 301
Fallas v Mourlas [2006] NSWCA 32; (2006) 65 NSWLR 418
Francis v Lewis [2003] NSWCA 152
Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Limited v Ryan [2002] HCA 54; (2002) 211 CLR 540
Hackshaw v Shaw [1984] HCA 84; (1984) 155 CLR 614
Jackson v McDonald’s Australia Ltd [2014] NSWCA 162
Jones v Bartlett [2000] HCA 56; (2000) 205 CLR 166
Kocis v SE Dickens Pty Limited [1998] 3 VR 408
Mobbs v Kain [2009] NSWCA 301; (2009) 54 MVR 179
Neindorf v Junkovic [2005] HCA 75
Reid v Commercial Club (Albury) Limited [2014] NSWCA 98
Roads & Traffic Authority (NSW) v Dederer [2007] HCA 42; (2007) 234 CLR 330
Shirt v Wyong Shire Council [1978] 1 NSWLR 631
Strong v Woolworths Limited [2012] HCA 5; (2012) 246 CLR 182
Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62; (2005) 223 CLR 422
Wilkinson v Law Courts Limited [2001] NSWCA 196Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dusko Trajkovski (Plaintiff)
Ballgate Pty Limited t/as “The Grand Hotel, Rockdale” (Defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M K Rollinson (Plaintiff)
R Gambi (Defendant)
Justice Lawyers (plaintiff)
McCabe Curwood (defendant)
File Number(s): 2016/384919
Judgment
Introduction
-
By a Statement of Claim filed on 22 December 2016 the plaintiff sought damages from the defendant in negligence. The plaintiff alleged that he was a patron at The Grand Hotel at Rockdale, which was operated by the defendant, on 15 January 2014. He alleged that on that day there was a piece of broken glass on the ground at the hotel and he trod on it.
-
By its Defence filed on 2 February 2018 the defendant admitted owing a duty of care to entrants on its premises but did not admit that the plaintiff stepped on broken glass…
Continue reading Trajkovski v Ballgate Pty Limited
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Trajkovski v Ballgate Pty Limited [2018] NSWDC 308
- Case
- [2018] NSWDC 308
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff as a hotel guest. The risk of guests encountering broken glass was deemed foreseeable and not insignificant. The defendant had failed to take reasonable precautions to prevent such an occurrence, despite the relative ease of implementing measures to address the risk. The court concluded that the plaintiff's injury was a direct result of the defendant's negligence. Regarding damages, the plaintiff was awarded compensation for past out-of-pocket expenses, past economic loss, and future loss of earning capacity.
Following the determination of liability and damages, the court ordered judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $43,681.20. The defendant was further ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs. The court also granted leave to the parties to approach an Associate within seven days if either party sought a different costs order. This decision underscores the importance of hotels maintaining safe environments for their guests and the legal consequences of failing to do so.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for $43,681.20.
(2) Order the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs.
(3) Grant leave to the parties to approach my Associate within seven days if either party seeks a different costs order.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.