FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| SZBDK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2006] FMCA 592 |
| MIGRATION – Protection visa application – judicial review of the delegate’s decision – decision previously affirmed by the Refugee Review Tribunal in its decision upheld by the Federal Magistrates Court, the Federal Court and the High Court – new application dismissed as an abuse of process. |
| Federal Magistrates Court Act 1999 (Cth), ss.14, 15 Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 (Cth), r.13.10 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s.39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss.66, 91X |
| First Applicant: | SZBDK |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS |
| Second Respondent: | REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
| File number: | SYG3211 of 2005 |
| Judgment of: | Lloyd-Jones FM |
| Hearing date: | 6 April 2006 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 6 April 2006 |
REPRESENTATION
| Applicant: | Applicant appeared in person with the aid of a Tamil interpreter |
| Advocate for the Respondents: | Ms Z Brauer |
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | Clayton Utz |
ORDERS
The first respondent’s interlocutory application filed on 16 February 2006 is upheld.
The application for judicial review filed by the applicant on
3 November 2005 is dismissed.
The Court directs that no further application by the applicant to review the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (of Mr Bruce MacCarthy, File No: NO2/43590) made on 17 June 2003 and handed down on
11 July 2003, or the decision of the delegate of the Minister for Immigration (of Nehmat Abdo File No: CLF2002/357) made on
26 June 2002, is to be accepted for filing without leave of this Court.
The applicant is to pay the first respondent’s costs and disbursements of and incidental to the application, fixed in the sum of $2,300.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG3211 of 2005
| SZBDK |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS |
First Respondent
| REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Proceedings
By an interlocutory application filed on 6 February 2006, the first respondent seeks an order that the application be dismissed pursuant to the jurisdiction conferred by s.14 and/or s.15 of the Federal Magistrates Court Act 1999 (Cth) on the grounds that:
1.An order that the proceedings be dismissed pursuant to r.13.10 of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 (Cth) (“the Rules”) on the basis that:
(a)no reasonable cause of action or basis for the application is disclosed;
(b)further or in the alternative, the proceedings or claim for relief is frivolous or vexatious; and
(c)further or in the alternative, the proceeding or claim for relief is an abuse of the process of the Court.
2.Further, an order that the Court direct that no further application by…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read SZBDK v Minister for Immigration and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2006] FMCA 592
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court addressed were the validity and legality of the decisions made by the Refugee Review Tribunal and the delegate, focusing on whether the decisions were made in accordance with the Migration Act 1958 and whether they were based on relevant and material considerations. The court also examined the procedural fairness of the decisions and whether there were any jurisdictional errors.
In its reasoning, the court held that the decisions were lawful and reasonable. The court found that the Tribunal and the delegate appropriately considered the evidence and applied the correct legal principles. The court also found no procedural unfairness and concluded that there were no jurisdictional errors in the decisions. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for judicial review and upheld the interlocutory application filed by the Minister for Immigration.
The court further ordered that no further application by the applicant to review the specified decisions could be filed without the leave of the Court. Additionally, the applicant was directed to pay the first respondent's costs and disbursements in the sum of $2,300. This ruling effectively concluded the applicant's attempts to challenge the decisions without the need for further leave applications.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The first respondent’s interlocutory application filed on 16 February 2006 is upheld.
2.
The application for judicial review filed by the applicant on
3 November 2005 is dismissed.
3.
The Court directs that no further application by the applicant to review the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (of Mr Bruce MacCarthy, File No: NO2/43590) made on 17 June 2003 and handed down on
11 July 2003, or the decision of the delegate of the Minister for Immigration (of Nehmat Abdo File No: CLF2002/357) made on
26 June 2002, is to be accepted for filing without leave of this Court.
4.
The applicant is to pay the first respondent’s costs and disbursements of and incidental to the application, fixed in the sum of $2,300.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.