Suzanne Grae Corporation Pty Ltd v Design West Mode Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2019] ATMO 92
•17 June 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Suzanne Grae Corporation Pty Ltd v Design West Mode Pty Ltd [2019] ATMO 92
[2019] ATMO 92
17 June 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Suzanne Grae Corporation Pty Ltd, the applicant, sought to register a trade mark, while Design West Mode Pty Ltd acted as the opponent. The dispute concerned the opposition to the registration of Suzanne Grae Corporation Pty Ltd's trade mark. The decision was made by M. Cooper.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was whether the grounds of opposition raised by Design West Mode Pty Ltd had been established, thereby preventing the registration of Suzanne Grae Corporation Pty Ltd's trade mark. The Registrar was required to consider the extent to which any ground of opposition was proven, in accordance with section 55 of the relevant Act.
The Registrar determined that the opponent, Design West Mode Pty Ltd, had failed to establish any of the grounds of opposition it had nominated. Consequently, the Registrar decided that the trade mark application could proceed to registration, subject to a one-month period from the date of the decision. The Registrar also stipulated that if a notice of appeal was served before the expiry of this period, registration would be stayed until the appeal was withdrawn or a court ordered otherwise. In relation to costs, the Registrar applied the general rule that costs follow the event, awarding costs against the opponent due to its failure to establish any grounds of opposition.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was whether the grounds of opposition raised by Design West Mode Pty Ltd had been established, thereby preventing the registration of Suzanne Grae Corporation Pty Ltd's trade mark. The Registrar was required to consider the extent to which any ground of opposition was proven, in accordance with section 55 of the relevant Act.
The Registrar determined that the opponent, Design West Mode Pty Ltd, had failed to establish any of the grounds of opposition it had nominated. Consequently, the Registrar decided that the trade mark application could proceed to registration, subject to a one-month period from the date of the decision. The Registrar also stipulated that if a notice of appeal was served before the expiry of this period, registration would be stayed until the appeal was withdrawn or a court ordered otherwise. In relation to costs, the Registrar applied the general rule that costs follow the event, awarding costs against the opponent due to its failure to establish any grounds of opposition.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Toddler Kindy Gymbaroo Pty Ltd v Gymboree Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 618
Cases Citing This Decision
156
Cases Cited
24
Statutory Material Cited
0
Pfizer Products Inc v Karam
[2006] FCA 1663
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths
[1999] FCA 1020