White JA at [1]; Brereton JA at [67]; Simpson AJA at [151]
Decision:
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside the orders of the primary judge of 16 July 2018.
3. In lieu therefore, order that in addition to the provision made for her by clause 6 of the will dated 19 September 2016 of Geoffrey Leslie Steinmetz deceased, but in lieu of the provision made for her by clause 7 thereof, the appellant Gayle Maria Warr Steinmetz receive from the estate of the deceased a legacy of $1,750,000, such legacy not to bear interest if paid within 90 days, but otherwise to bear interest at the rate prescribed for unpaid legacies.
4. Respondent pay appellant’s costs of the appeal and of the proceedings at first instance.
Catchwords:
SUCCESSION – family provision – claim by widow who was second wife – where estate substantial – where will left annuity to widow and balance of estate to children of first marriage – relevance of testamentary freedom – guidelines relating to widows’ claims – annuities – adequate provision for proper maintenance and advancement
[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.
[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.
[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.
Consideration
[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.
[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.
Continue reading Steinmetz v Shannon
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
AGLC
Steinmetz v Shannon [2019] NSWCA 114
Case
[2019] NSWCA 114
Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of *Steinmetz v Shannon* concerned a family provision claim brought by the widow of the deceased, Gayle Maria Warr Steinmetz, against the executors of the estate. The deceased's will provided an annuity for his widow and left the balance of his substantial estate to the children of his first marriage. The dispute centred on whether the provision made for the widow in the will constituted adequate provision for her proper maintenance, advancement, and support.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the primary judge had erred in their assessment of the adequacy of the provision made for the widow under the terms of the will, and consequently, whether the widow was entitled to further provision from the estate. This involved considering the deceased's testamentary freedom, the specific circumstances of the widow, and established guidelines for assessing claims by second wives.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding that the provision made for the widow was inadequate. The court reasoned that while testamentary freedom is a significant consideration, it must be balanced against the need to make adequate provision for a surviving spouse. The court considered the widow's age, health, financial position, and the deceased's obligations to her, concluding that the annuity alone did not meet the standard of proper maintenance and advancement. The court therefore set aside the orders of the primary judge and ordered that the widow receive a legacy of $1,750,000 from the estate, in lieu of the annuity provided in the will. The respondent was ordered to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and the proceedings at first instance.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside the orders of the primary judge of 16 July 2018.
3. In lieu therefore, order that in addition to the provision made for her by clause 6 of the will dated 19 September 2016 of Geoffrey Leslie Steinmetz deceased, but in lieu of the provision made for her by clause 7 thereof, the appellant Gayle Maria Warr Steinmetz receive from the estate of the deceased a legacy of $1,750,000, such legacy not to bear interest if paid within 90 days, but otherwise to bear interest at the rate prescribed for unpaid legacies.
4. Respondent pay appellant’s costs of the appeal and of the proceedings at first instance.