Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2003] AATA 1247
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No N2001/1173
VETERANS' AFFAIRS DIVISION ) Re JOAN STARR Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Mr S. Webb, Member Date11 December 2003
PlaceSydney
Decision The decision under review is set aside. In its place the Tribunal decides that Mr Phillips’ death was war-caused and Ms Starr is entitled to a War Widow’s Pension. The matter is remitted to the Repatriation Commission to determine the correct pension that is payable in accordance with these reasons.
[Sgd] Mr S. Webb, Member
Administrative
Appeals
TribunalADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No N2001/1173GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION )
ReJOAN STARR
Applicant
AndREPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
ORDER TO AMEND WRITTEN DECISION [2003] AATA 1247
TribunalMr S Webb, Member
Date4 February 2004
PlaceSydney
WHEREAS:
1.the Tribunal released a written decision in this matter, dated 11 December 2003; and
2.it has come to the Tribunal’s attention that there was a typing error in the decision;
3.the Tribunal wishes to amend the written decision so as to rectify the error and wishing to do so with the least cost and inconvenience to the parties, applies the provision of section 43AA of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975.
NOW THE TRIBUNAL THEREFORE ORDERS that paragraph 61 of the decision reads as follows:
“This being the case, I find that the late veteran's death was war-caused and Ms Starr is entitled to a Widow's Pension payable from 3 months prior to the date of claim, ie. 24 April 2000 (s.20).”
[Sgd] Mr S Webb
Member
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS - widow pension - marriage-like relationship - death of veteran - WWII operational service - reasonable hypothesis - ischaemic heart disease, dyslipidaemia, alcohol consumption - Statement of Principles concerning Ischaemic Heart Disease - no Statement of Principles concerning dyslipidaemia - material pointing to alcohol consumption caused by service - decision set aside
Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 sections 5E, 6A, 8, 9, 11A, 13, 14, 119, 120, 120A, 196B
Repatriation Medical Authority Statement of Principles 53 of 2003 for Ischaemic Heart Disease
Repatriation Commission v Delidio (1998) 83 FCR 82
McKenna v Repatriation Commission (1999) 86 FCR 144
Byrnes v Repatriation Commission (1993) 177 CLR 564
Repatriation Commission v Hancock [2003] FCA 710
Bushell v Repatriation Commission (1992) 175 CLR 408
Gosewinckel v Repatriation Commission (1999) 59 ALD 690
Connors v Repatriation Commission (2000) 59 ALD 61
Elliott v Repatriation Commission (2002) 73 ALD 377
Cornelius v Repatriation Commission [2002] FCA 750
Repatriation Commission v Bey (1997) 79 FCR 364
Woodward v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCAFC 160
Hughes v Repatriation Commission (1990) 13 AAR 34
Bull v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCR 823
REASONS FOR DECISION
11 December 2003 Mr S. Webb, Member 1. On 9 October 1999 Mr David Phillips (“the late veteran”) died (T4, f23). On 24 July 2000 Ms Joan Starr, his defacto wife, lodged a claim for a War Widow’s Pension (T4). The Repatriation Commission rejected her claim on…
Continue reading Starr and Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Starr and Repatriation Commission [2003] AATA 1247
- Case
- [2003] AATA 1247
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Repatriation Commission was correct in finding that Mr Phillips' death was not caused by his service and, if not, whether Ms Starr was entitled to a War Widow's Pension. The court had to consider the evidence of ischaemic heart disease, dyslipidaemia, and alcohol consumption in light of the relevant legislative provisions and the Statement of Principles for Ischaemic Heart Disease. The court needed to determine if the evidence pointed to the conditions being reasonably attributable to Mr Phillips' service.
The court found that the Repatriation Commission's decision was flawed. The evidence presented a reasonable hypothesis that Mr Phillips' ischaemic heart disease and dyslipidaemia were caused by his service, and there was material pointing to his alcohol consumption during service. The court held that the Commission had not properly considered the evidence and the applicable legal principles, particularly in relation to the connection between the conditions and Mr Phillips' service. The court set aside the Commission's decision and held that Mr Phillips' death was war-caused, entitling Ms Starr to a War Widow's Pension. The matter was remitted to the Repatriation Commission to determine the correct pension payable.
The court's orders were that the decision under review be set aside, and in its place, the Tribunal decided that Mr Phillips’ death was war-caused and Ms Starr was entitled to a War Widow’s Pension. The matter was remitted to the Repatriation Commission to determine the correct pension that is payable in accordance with these reasons.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision under review is set aside. In its place the Tribunal decides that Mr Phillips’ death was war-caused and Ms Starr is entitled to a War Widow’s Pension. The matter is remitted to the Repatriation Commission to determine the correct pension that is payable in accordance with these reasons.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.