SMITH & ANOR -v- McCUSKER QC [2005] WASCA 226
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2005] WASCA 226 | |
| THE COURT OF APPEAL (WA) | |||
| Case No: | FUL:133/2003 | 7 JUNE 2005 | |
| Coram: | WHEELER JA ROBERTS-SMITH JA MCLURE JA | 28/11/05 | |
| 41 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Appeal allowed | ||
| B | |||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | JAMES GARNETT SMITH ELIZABETH ANNE SMITH MALCOLM JAMES McCUSKER QC |
Catchwords: | Practice and procedure Appeal from grant of summary judgment Negligence Legal practitioner Loss of opportunity to bring action Unrepresented litigant Defective pleadings Turns on own facts |
Legislation: | Nil |
Case References: | Bank Fü Gemeinwirtschaft v City of London Garages Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 149. Bank Für Gemeinwirtschaft Aktiengesellschaft v City of London Garages Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 149 Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 87 Forsayth NL v Northern Gold NL, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 940012; 20 January 1994 G W Sinclair & Co Pty Ltd v Cocks [2001] ANZ ConvR 522 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Johnson v Perez (1988) 166 CLR 351 Kitchen v Royal Air Force Association [1958] 1 WLR 563 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 Michael v Nicolson, unreported; FCt SCt of WA; Library No 950660; 1 December 1995 Miles v Bull [1969] 1 QB 258 Smith & Anor v McCusker QC & Anor [2000] WASCA 320 Smith & Anor v McCusker QC & Anor [2001] WASCA 85 Smith v McCusker QC [2000] WASCA 320 Smith v McCusker QC [2001] WASCA 85 Unity Insurance Brokers Pty Ltd v Rocco Pezzano Pty Ltd (1997) 9 ANZ Ins Cas 61-343 Laferla v Birdon Sands Pty Ltd, unreported; SCt of NT; 21 August 1998 Servcom Australia Pty Ltd v Shenton [2000] WASC 49 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : THE COURT OF APPEAL (WA) CITATION : SMITH & ANOR -v- McCUSKER QC [2005] WASCA 226 CORAM : WHEELER JA
- ROBERTS-SMITH JA
MCLURE JA
- ELIZABETH ANNE SMITH
Appellants
AND
MALCOLM JAMES McCUSKER QC
Respondent
ON APPEAL FROM:
Jurisdiction : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Coram : MASTER SANDERSON
Citation : SMITH & ANOR -v- McCUSKER QC [2003] WASC 150
(Page 2)
Catchwords:
Practice and procedure - Appeal from grant of summary judgment - Negligence - Legal practitioner - Loss of opportunity to bring action - Unrepresented litigant - Defective pleadings - Turns on own facts
Legislation:
Nil
Result:
Appeal allowed
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
Appellants : In person
Respondent : Mr C L Zelestis QC & Mr S S Sandhu
Solicitors:
Appellants : In person
Respondent : Maxim Litigation Consultants
Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):
Bank Für Gemeinwirtschaft Aktiengesellschaft v City of London Garages Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 149
Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Ltd…
Continue reading Smith v McCusker QC
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
- AGLC
- Smith v McCusker QC [2005] WASCA 226
- Case
- [2005] WASCA 226
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Smith v McCusker QC is an appeal by the plaintiff against the grant of summary judgment in favour of the defendant. The plaintiff, an unrepresented litigant, sought to recover damages for professional negligence against the defendant, a legal practitioner. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant's failure to bring a particular action within the requisite time resulted in a loss of opportunity. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria.
The central legal issues in this case revolved around the appropriate application of the summary judgment procedure in Victoria and the sufficiency of the plaintiff's pleadings. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the plaintiff's claim for professional negligence was viable despite the plaintiff being unrepresented and whether the pleadings were sufficient to warrant a hearing. The court was also required to assess whether the plaintiff's loss of opportunity claim was valid, considering the unique circumstances of the case.
The court found that the grant of summary judgment was inappropriate, as the plaintiff's pleadings, although defective, contained sufficient particulars to warrant a full hearing. The court held that the plaintiff's unrepresented status did not preclude them from pursuing a claim for professional negligence, and the loss of opportunity claim was not inherently flawed. The court emphasised that each case turns on its own facts, and the procedural defects could be addressed through the court's inherent jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the summary judgment granted to the defendant was set aside.
The central legal issues in this case revolved around the appropriate application of the summary judgment procedure in Victoria and the sufficiency of the plaintiff's pleadings. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the plaintiff's claim for professional negligence was viable despite the plaintiff being unrepresented and whether the pleadings were sufficient to warrant a hearing. The court was also required to assess whether the plaintiff's loss of opportunity claim was valid, considering the unique circumstances of the case.
The court found that the grant of summary judgment was inappropriate, as the plaintiff's pleadings, although defective, contained sufficient particulars to warrant a full hearing. The court held that the plaintiff's unrepresented status did not preclude them from pursuing a claim for professional negligence, and the loss of opportunity claim was not inherently flawed. The court emphasised that each case turns on its own facts, and the procedural defects could be addressed through the court's inherent jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the summary judgment granted to the defendant was set aside.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeal allowed
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.