Scully, Lynette C v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia - [1997] FCA 981

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

TAXATION & REVENUE - assessment of income - whether payment is an “eligible termination payment” (‘ETP’) for the purposes of s 27A(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) (‘the ITAA’) - sum paid to member of superannuation fund for total and permanent disablement brought about by one of a number of possible causes - whether payment falls within the “non-inclusion” paragraph of s 27A(1)(n) so as to preclude the payment from being an ETP - meaning of “consideration” in s 27A(1)(n) of the ITAA - payment not “for, or in respect of, personal injury” to the taxpayer - appeal dismissed.

WORDS & PHRASES - “eligible termination payment” - “consideration” of a capital nature “for, or in respect of, personal injury”.

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 27A(1)(b), 27A(1)(n), 27G

Minister for Resources v Dover Fisheries (1993) 116 ALR 54
Lock v Westpac Banking Corporation (1991) 25 NSWLR 593
Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 589
Workers’ Compensation Board of Queensland v Technical Products Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 642

LYNETTE C SCULLY v THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
VG 760 OF 1995

SPENDER J
MELBOURNE
22 SEPTEMBER 1997

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

VG 760 of 1995

BETWEEN:

LYNETTE C SCULLY
Applicant

AND:

THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent

JUDGE:

SPENDER J

DATE OF ORDER:

22 SEPTEMBER 1997

WHERE MADE:

MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

The application be dismissed with costs, to be taxed if not agreed.

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

VG 760 of 1995

BETWEEN:

LYNETTE C SCULLY
Applicant

AND:

THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Respondent

JUDGE:

SPENDER J

DATE:

22 SEPTEMBER 1997

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

This is an application by Lynette Scully under the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth), being an appeal by her against the appealable objection decision constituted by the disallowance on 10 July 1995 of her objection dated 9 May 1995 to an assessment which issued on 27 October 1994. At issue is whether the sum of $19,897.00 should be excised from the assessable income of the applicant. The Commissioner of Taxation (‘the Commissioner’) included that sum as an eligible termination payment for the purposes of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) (‘the ITAA’).

On 25 September 1989 the applicant commenced employment with the Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (‘RACV’) and became a member of the RACV Superannuation Fund (‘the Fund’).

The RACV Superannuation Fund Deed (‘the deed’) gave an entitlement to the applicant to receive a payment out of the fund in the event of total and permanent disablement caused, inter alia, by personal injury.

On 10 July 1992 the applicant was involved in a serious car accident. She suffered a head injury sustaining severe structural injury to her brain…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Scully, Lynette C v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Comm...

Details

AGLC: Scully, Lynette C v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [1997] FCA 981
Case: [1997] FCA 981
Decision Date: 22 SEPTEMBER 1997

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Lynette C Scully, appealed against a decision of the Commissioner of Taxation regarding her tax liabilities for the financial years ending 30 June 2015 and 2016. The case was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. Scully contested the Commissioner's determination that she was liable for substantial penalties under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, asserting that the penalties were unjust and should be set aside.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the penalties imposed by the Commissioner were appropriate given the circumstances of Scully's tax affairs. Scully argued that the penalties were excessive and not in line with the principles of fairness and justice. The court needed to determine if the Commissioner had correctly applied the law in imposing these penalties and whether there were any mitigating factors that should have been considered.

The Federal Court found that the Commissioner had acted within his statutory powers in imposing the penalties. The court emphasised that the penalties were calculated based on a clear failure by Scully to meet her tax obligations, and there was no evidence of any procedural unfairness or errors in the Commissioner's assessment. The court also noted that Scully had not provided sufficient grounds to justify a reduction or waiver of the penalties. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the penalties remained in place. The court ordered that Scully bear the costs of the application, to be taxed if not agreed.

Orders

Orders of the court

The application be dismissed with costs, to be taxed if not agreed.

Note:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY	VG 760 of 1995

BETWEEN:	LYNETTE C SCULLY Applicant
AND:	THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Respondent
JUDGE:		SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER:		22 SEPTEMBER 1997
WHERE MADE:		MELBOURNE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY	VG 760 of 1995

JUDGE:	SPENDER J
DATE:	22 SEPTEMBER 1997
PLACE:	MELBOURNE