Robsyn Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v O'Brien

Link copied
Case Copied 24 min read

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Robsyn Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v O’Brien [2012] QSC 285

PARTIES:

ROBSYN PTY LTD (in liquidation)
(applicant)
v
PATRICIA MAY O’BRIEN AS TRUSTEE FOR THE JT & PM O’BRIEN SUPERANNUATION FUND
(respondent)

FILE NO/S:

637 of 2012

DIVISION:

Trial Division

PROCEEDING:

Application

ORIGINATING COURT:

Supreme Court of Queensland

DELIVERED ON:

21 September 2012

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

7 February and 9 February 2012
Written submissions

JUDGE:

Daubney J

ORDERS:

1. (a)   The respondent indemnify the applicant from the $60,000 fund paid into Court on 22 November 2011 (“the Monies”) in the sum of $1,999.68 for the debt payable in that sum to the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation;

    (b)   The balance of the Monies (and any accretions) be paid out of Court to the respondent.

2.    I will hear the parties as to costs

CATCHWORDS:

EQUITY – TRUSTS AND TRSUSTEES – POWERS DUTIES RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES OF TRUSTEES – INDEMNITY LIEN AND REIMBURSEMENT – RELEVANT PRICNIPLES – where the applicant seeks reimbursement for all liabilities incurred by the applicant in its capacity as trustee of the superannuation fund – whether the respondent ought indemnify the applicant for any or all of these costs

CORPORATIONS – WINDING UP – LIQUIDATORS – RENUMERATION – IN WINDING UP BY COURT – GENERALLY – where the applicant seeks reimbursement for all liabilities incurred by the applicant in its capacity as trustee of a superannuation fund – where liabilities incurred pre and post winding up –  where costs and expenses include legal costs and remuneration of the liquidator – where legal action commenced by the liquidator unsuccessful –whether the respondent ought indemnify the application for any or all of these costs

Trusts Act 1973 (Qld), s 72

Dayroll Pty Ltd (in liq) v Dayroll NSW Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 895
O’Brien v Robsyn Pty Ltd
[2011] QSC 399

COUNSEL:

A G Martin for the applicant
M Martin for the respondent

SOLICITORS:

Taylor David Lawyers for the applicant
MacDonnells Law for the respondent

  1. By the present application, as filed, the applicant sought the following relief:

“1. An order pursuant to section 72 of the Trusts Act (Qld) 1973, or alternatively pursuant to a covenant contained in a Deed dated 28 April 2008, that the Respondent indemnify the Applicant from the $60,000 fund paid into this honourable Court on 22 November 2011 (“the Monies”) for all liabilities incurred by the Applicant in its capacity as trustee of the JT & PM O’Brien Superannuation Fund (“the Fund”).

2.   An order pursuant to s101 of the Trusts Act (Qld.) 1973 that the Applicant be entitled to charge, and recover from, the Monies, an amount equal to the Applicant’s reasonable remuneration for having acted as trustee of the Fund for the period 23 November 1996 to 28 April 2008.

3.   An order that the Applicant be indemnified from the Monies for its costs in these proceedings.

4.   An order that the Respondent indemnify the Applicant in respect of the Applicant’s legal costs of these…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Robsyn Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v O'Brien and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] QSC 285
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Robsyn Pty Ltd (in liquidation) has applied for a declaration that the respondent, O'Brien, should indemnify it for all costs and expenses incurred in its capacity as the trustee of the superannuation fund. The application was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland. The key legal issue before the court was whether the respondent was liable to indemnify the applicant for the costs and expenses it incurred as trustee of the superannuation fund. This included both pre and post-winding-up costs, such as legal costs and liquidator remuneration.

The court considered the relevant principles of equity and the powers, duties, rights, and liabilities of trustees. It also examined the duties of liquidators under the Corporations Act. The court found that the respondent was liable to indemnify the applicant for some of the costs incurred. Specifically, the court held that the respondent should indemnify the applicant for the $1,999.68 debt to the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation. This amount was paid into court on 22 November 2011. The balance of the money, along with any interest, should be paid out of court to the respondent. The court did not find the respondent liable for the unsuccessful legal action taken by the liquidator. The court also noted that it would hear submissions from the parties regarding the costs of the proceeding.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. (a) The respondent indemnify the applicant from the $60,000 fund paid into Court on 22 November 2011 (“the Monies”) in the sum of $1,999.68 for the debt payable in that sum to the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation;

(b) The balance of the Monies (and any accretions) be paid out of Court to the respondent.

2. I will hear the parties as to costs

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.