Re Williamson and Repatriation Commission

Case [2004] AATA 1185


Administrative

Appeals

Tribunal

 

DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2004] AATA 1185

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL      )

)          No Q2003/198

VETERANS' APPEALS  DIVISION

)

Re DAVID JOHN WILLIAMSON

Applicant

And

REPATRIATION COMMISSION

Respondent

DECISION

Tribunal Senior Member BJ McCabe
Member SC Fisher

Date10 November 2004  

PlaceBrisbane

Decision

The Tribunal decides:

(a)      to set aside the VRB decision under review of 13 November 2002            insofar as lumbar spondylosis is concerned and to accept this            condition as being defence-caused with effect from 5 November            2001;

(b)      to remit the matter of assessment of incapacity from lumbar            spondylosis together with all previously accepted conditions to the            Repatriation Commission; and

(c)       to affirm that part of the VRB decision under review of            13 November 2002 refusing acceptance of post traumatic stress            disorder, alcohol dependence and alcohol abuse and gastro-           oesophageal reflex disease.

....................[Sgd].........................

BJ McCabe
  Senior Member

CATCHWORDS

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS – pensions and benefits – whether post traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, alcohol abuse, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are war-caused – whether raised facts fit Statements of Principles – decision affirmed
VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS – pensions and benefits – whether lumbar spondylosis is defence-caused – whether Statement of Principles is satisfied – decision set aside

Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
Repatriation Commission v Stoddart [2003] FCAFC 300
Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82
Woodward v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCAFC 160
Stoddart v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCA 334
Byrnes v Repatriation Commission (1993) 177 CLR 564
McKenna v Repatriation Commission [1999] FCA 323

REASONS FOR DECISION

10 November 2004   Senior Member BJ McCabe
Member SC Fisher

Introduction

1.      Mr Williamson is the applicant in these proceedings. He lodged a claim under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act) for medical treatment and a pension for incapacity from several conditions, including bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, fracture of the right lower leg, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol abuse or dependence, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and lumbar spondylosis.  He says these conditions are related to his service in Vietnam.

2.      The Repatriation Commission accepted liability for bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and fracture of the right lower leg.  It rejected Mr Williamson’s contention that his other medical conditions (PTSD, alcohol abuse or dependence, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and lumbar spondylosis) were service related, and made a decision to that effect on 26 April 2004.  The Repatriation Commission’s decision was affirmed by the Veterans’ Review Board (the VRB) on 13 November 2002. From the VRB Mr Williamson lodged an appeal with this Tribunal, which heard the matter on 12 August 2004.

Background

3.      The applicant was born on 13 January 1949.  He served in the Royal Australian Navy from 27 August 1966 to 27 August 1976.  His operational service was from 14 – 29 May 1969 aboard HMAS Vampire in Vietnam.

4.      The applicant also rendered defence service from 7 December 1972 to his discharge on 27 August 1976.

The Material Before the Tribunal

5.      The following documentary evidence was before the Tribunal:

Exhibit 1 Documents lodged pursuant to section 37…

Continue reading Re Williamson and Repatriation Commission

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Williamson and Repatriation Commission [2004] AATA 1185
Case
[2004] AATA 1185
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved a dispute between the Repatriation Commission and Stoddart regarding the assessment of various medical conditions claimed to be related to Stoddart’s military service. The central issue was whether certain conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, alcohol abuse, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and lumbar spondylosis, were caused by his service. The case was heard in the Federal Court of Australia.

The court was required to determine whether the facts of the case met the criteria set out in the Statements of Principles concerning the causation of the conditions. The court had to consider whether the evidence provided by Stoddart was sufficient to establish that his conditions were caused by his service, as required by the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. The court also had to determine if the Repatriation Commission’s decision to reject certain conditions was legally sound.

The court found that the Repatriation Commission had erred in its assessment of lumbar spondylosis. The Tribunal concluded that the evidence did support the claim that this condition was caused by Stoddart’s service. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the decision to reject this condition and accepted it as defence-caused. However, the court affirmed the rejection of other conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence, alcohol abuse, and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, finding that the evidence did not meet the required criteria.

The court’s final orders included setting aside the decision concerning lumbar spondylosis and accepting it as defence-caused, remitting the matter of assessing incapacity from this condition and other accepted conditions back to the Repatriation Commission, and affirming the rejection of the other conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Tribunal decides:

(a) to set aside the VRB decision under review of 13 November 2002 insofar as lumbar spondylosis is concerned and to accept this condition as being defence-caused with effect from 5 November 2001;

(b) to remit the matter of assessment of incapacity from lumbar spondylosis together with all previously accepted conditions to the Repatriation Commission; and

(c) to affirm that part of the VRB decision under review of 13 November 2002 refusing acceptance of post traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependence and alcohol abuse and gastro- oesophageal reflex disease.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.