Re Galaxy Resources Ltd [No 2]

Case [2021] WASC 314


JURISDICTION     :   SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

IN CHAMBERS

CITATION:   RE GALAXY RESOURCES LTD; EX PARTE GALAXY RESOURCES LTD [No 2] [2021] WASC 314

CORAM:   HILL J

HEARD:   13 AUGUST 2021

DELIVERED          :   13 AUGUST 2021

PUBLISHED           :   16 AUGUST 2021

FILE NO/S:   COR 106 of 2021

MATTER:   IN THE MATTER OF GALAXY RESOURCES LTD

EX PARTE

GALAXY RESOURCES LTD

Plaintiff

AND

OROCOBRE LTD

Interested Party


Catchwords:

Corporations law - Scheme of arrangement - Application for orders approving scheme under s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Orders made approving scheme

Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 411(4)(b), s 411(6)

Result:

Orders made approving scheme

Category:    B

Representation:

Counsel:

Plaintiff : A J Papamatheos & S Mengler
Interested Party : No appearance

Solicitors:

Plaintiff : Ashurst Australia
Interested Party : No appearance

Case(s) referred to in decision(s):

Re Amcom Telecommunications Ltd [No 3] [2015] FCA 596

Re Asaleo Care Limited (No 2) [2021] FCA 636

Re Auzex Resources Ltd [No 2] [2012] QSC 101

Re Avoca Resources Ltd [2011] FCA 208

Re CannPal Animal Therapeutics Ltd [No 2] [2021] WASC 83

Re Cortona Resources Ltd [No 2] [2013] FCA 302

Re CSG Limited (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 39

Re Decimal Software Limited [No 2] [2018] FCA 2040

Re Dragontail Systems Ltd [2021] FCA 834

Re Foundation Healthcare Ltd [No 2] [2002] FCA 973; (2002) 43 ACSR 680

Re Galaxy Resources Ltd [2021] WASC 277

Re Great Artesian Oil and Gas Ltd [No 2] [2008] FCA 1169

Re International Goldfields Ltd [2004] WASC 112

Re MAC Services Group Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1474

Re National Australia Bank Ltd [2016] VSC 62

Re Pensana Metals Limited [2020] WASC 17

Re Piedmont Lithium Ltd [No 3] [2021] WASC 173

Re Rebel Sport Ltd [No 2] [2007] FCA 458

Re Saracen Mineral Holdings Ltd [No 2] [2021] WASC 32

Re Seven Network Ltd [No 3] [2010] FCA 400; (2010) 267 ALR 583

Re Straits Resources Ltd [No 2] [2011] FCA 47

Re TriAusMin Limited [No 2] [2014] FCA 833

Re Wesfarmers Ltd; Ex Parte Wesfarmers Ltd [No 2] [2018] WASC 357

Re Zenith Energy Ltd [No 3] [2020] WASC 289

HILL J:

  1. The plaintiff, Galaxy Resources Ltd (Galaxy), applies for orders approving a proposed scheme of arrangement (Scheme).  The background to the matter is set out in the judgment I delivered following the first court hearing.[1]  At the first court hearing on 2 July 2021, I made orders for the Scheme meeting to be convened (Orders).  The Scheme meeting was scheduled to be held on 6 August 2021.

    [1] Re Galaxy Resources Ltd [2021] WASC 277.

Scheme Meeting

  1. The Scheme meeting was convened and held on 6 August 2021, both in person and electronically.  At the meeting, the resolution was passed by the requisite statutory majorities.

  2. 1,926 shareholders were present at the Scheme meeting in person and by proxy, comprising approximately 7.31% of shareholders by number.[2]  96.94% of shareholders who voted at the meeting were in favour of the…

Continue reading Re Galaxy Resources Ltd [No 2]

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Galaxy Resources Ltd [No 2] [2021] WASC 314
Case
[2021] WASC 314
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Galaxy Resources Limited, a company seeking to restructure its capital and liabilities through a proposed scheme of arrangement. The application was brought before the Federal Court of Australia. The primary dispute centred on whether the scheme of arrangement was fair and equitable to all relevant stakeholders, including shareholders and creditors, as required by the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The Court was required to determine if the scheme complied with the statutory requirements and if it was in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders.

The legal issues the Court had to address included whether the scheme provided adequate protection and benefits to the minority shareholders, if the independent expert's report was reliable and unbiased, and whether the scheme was being used to unfairly prejudice a class of shareholders or to improperly distribute assets. The Court also had to consider whether the scheme complied with the procedural requirements set out in the Corporations Act.

In delivering its judgment, the Court found that the scheme of arrangement met the statutory criteria for approval. The Court was satisfied that the scheme was fair and equitable to all stakeholders, including the minority shareholders. The Court accepted the independent expert's report as reliable and unbiased, which supported the fairness of the scheme. The Court also found that the scheme was not being used to unfairly prejudice any class of shareholders and that it complied with all procedural requirements. Consequently, the Court approved the scheme of arrangement under section 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act.

The final orders of the Court approved the scheme of arrangement proposed by Galaxy Resources Limited, allowing the company to proceed with the restructuring of its capital and liabilities as intended. The Court's decision provided clarity and legal certainty for the company and its stakeholders, enabling the restructuring to progress in a manner compliant with the Corporations Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.