Re Western Areas Ltd

Case [2022] WASC 193


JURISDICTION     :   SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

IN CHAMBERS

CITATION:   RE WESTERN AREAS LTD; EX PARTE WESTERN AREAS LTD [2022] WASC 193

CORAM:   HILL J

HEARD:   27 APRIL 2022

DELIVERED          :   27 APRIL 2022

PUBLISHED           :   2 JUNE 2022

FILE NO/S:   COR 33 of 2022

MATTER:   IN THE MATTER OF WESTERN AREAS LTD

EX PARTE

WESTERN AREAS LTD

Plaintiff

IGO NICKEL HOLDINGS PTY LTD

Third Party


Catchwords:

Corporations law - Scheme of arrangement - Application for orders convening scheme meeting under s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Whether requirements to order scheme meeting are satisfied - Orders made convening scheme meeting

Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 411(1), s 412(1)(a), s 1319
Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth), sch 8
Supreme Court (Corporations) (WA) Rules 2004 (WA), r 3.2

Result:

Orders made convening scheme meeting

Category:    B

Representation:

Counsel:

Plaintiff : S K Dharmananda & C E McKay
Third Party : J R C Sippe

Solicitors:

Plaintiff : Ashurst Australia
Third Party : Herbert Smith Freehills

Case(s) referred to in decision(s):

Re Amcom Telecommunications Ltd [2015] FCA 341

Re APN News & Media Ltd [2007] FCA 770; (2007) 62 ACSR 400

Re APN Property Group Ltd and APN RE Ltd [2021] VSC 389

Re Asaleo Care Limited [2021] FCA 406

Re Beadell Resources Ltd [2018] WASC 410; (2018) 133 ACSR 600

Re Bell Group Finance Pty Ltd (in liq) [2020] WASC 287

Re CannPal Animal Therapeutics Ltd [2021] WASC 37

Re CSR Ltd [2010] FCAFC 34; (2010) 183 FCR 358

Re David Jones Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 720; (2014) 101 ACSR 381

Re David Jones Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCA 753

Re Doray Minerals Ltd [2019] WASC 57

Re DUET Management Company 1 Ltd [2013] NSWSC 817; (2013) 95 ACSR 34

Re Galaxy Resources Ltd [2021] WASC 314

Re Kangaroo Resources Ltd [2018] WASC 327

Re Macquarie Private Capital A Ltd [2008] NSWSC 323

Re Mod Resources Ltd [2019] WASC 326

Re NTM Gold Ltd [2021] WASC 22

Re Nusantara Resources Ltd [2021] WASC 334

Re Nzuri Copper Ltd [2019] WASC 189

Re Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd [2009] FCA 813; (2009) 179 FCR 20

Re Ozgrowth Pty Ltd [2022] WASC 167

Re Pacific Energy Limited [2019] WASC 443

Re PetroNor E&P Ltd [2021] WASC 426

Re Piedmont Lithium Ltd [2021] WASC 76

Re Saracen Mineral Holdings Ltd [2020] WASC 483

Re SRG Ltd [2018] FCA 1092

Re Swick Mining Services Ltd [2022] WASC 79

Re URB Investments Ltd [2019] FCA 1977

Re Webster Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1907

Re Wesfarmers Ltd [2018] WASC 308

Re Wesfarmers Ltd [No 2] [2018] WASC 357

HILL J:

  1. The plaintiff, Western Areas Limited (Western Areas), is an Australian public company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX).  On 16 December 2021, Western Areas entered into a Scheme Implementation Deed (SID) with IGO Nickel Holdings Pty Ltd (IGO Nickel), a wholly owned subsidiary of IGO Limited (IGO), which was announced to the ASX on the same date.[1]…

Continue reading Re Western Areas Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Western Areas Ltd [2022] WASC 193
Case
[2022] WASC 193
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Western Areas Limited, an Australian public company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange, sought orders under s 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) to convene a meeting of its members to consider and vote on a proposed scheme of arrangement (the Scheme) to reorganise its capital structure. The proposed Scheme involved the acquisition of all issued capital in Western Areas by IGO Nickel Holdings Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of IGO Limited, with Western Areas' shareholders receiving $3.87 cash for each share held. The court had to determine whether the proposed Scheme was appropriate for consideration by Western Areas' members and whether it was fit for approval by the court. The court found that the proposed Scheme met all the necessary requirements. The Scheme was bona fide, properly proposed, and adequately disclosed. There were no class issues, and all shareholders were treated equally. The independent expert's opinion, while concluding that the Scheme was not fair, found it reasonable and in the best interests of shareholders, which was properly disclosed in the Scheme booklet. The court was satisfied that the Scheme provided adequate protection against the risk that shareholders would not receive the proposed consideration. The court also approved orders for electronic despatch of the Scheme booklet and proxy form, as well as the use of proxy solicitation agents, provided the scripts were consistent with the Scheme booklet. The court concluded that the Scheme was fit for consideration by Western Areas' members and made the requested orders convening the scheme meeting and approving the distribution of the Scheme booklet.

The court's orders included convening the scheme meeting, approving the distribution of the Scheme booklet, and allowing for electronic despatch of the Scheme booklet and proxy form. The court also approved the use of proxy solicitation agents, provided the scripts were consistent with the Scheme booklet. These orders facilitated the process for Western Areas' shareholders to consider and vote on the proposed Scheme.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.