Re Cashcard Australia Ltd

Case [2004] FCA 223


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Cashcard Australia Limited (ABN 74 002 405 754) [2004] FCA 223

SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT – members scheme – separate classes of members

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 411

Application of Australian Co-Operative Foods Limited (2001) 38 ACSR 71
Re CMPS & F Pty Ltd, (1997) 24 ACSR 728
Re Jax Marine Pty Ltd [1967] 1 NSWR 145
ReNRMA Limited (1999-2000) 33 ACSR 595
Re The Hills Motorway Ltd (2002) 43 ACSR 101
Sovereign Life Assurance Co v Dodd [1892] 2 QB 573

IN THE MATTER OF CASHCARD AUSTRALIA LTD  (ABN 74 002 405 754)
N 164 of 2004

JACOBSON J
27 FEBRUARY 2004
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

No N 164 of 2004

CASHCARD AUSTRALIA LTD (ABN 74 002 405 754)

Plaintiff

(IN THE MATTER OF CASHCARD AUSTRALIA LTD)

JUDGE:

JACOBSON J

DATE OF ORDER:

27 FEBRUARY 2004

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

Orders be made in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 5 of the short minutes of order dated 27 February 2004.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 164 of 2004

CASHCARD AUSTRALIA LTD
ABN 74 002 405 754
Plaintiff

(IN THE MATTER OF CASHCARD AUSTRALIA LTD)

JUDGE:

JACOBSON J

DATE:

27 FEBRUARY 2004

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. This is an application to convene a meeting of members pursuant to s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to consider and, if thought fit, to approve a scheme of arrangement between Cashcard and its shareholders, the terms of which are contained in an explanatory statement which is part of the scheme booklet.

  2. The following affidavits have been read in support of the application, an affidavit of Mr Richard Michael Haddock affirmed 16 February 2004, an affidavit of Mr Paul John Joseph Biancardi affirmed 25 February 2004, an affidavit of Mr Richard Michael Haddock affirmed 25 February 2004, an affidavit of Mr March Bernard Joseph Crean sworn 25 February 2004, an affidavit of Mr Gregory Craig Nash affirmed 25 February 2004, an affidavit of Mr Craig Lloyd Edwards sworn 24 February 2004, an affidavit of Mr Wayne Richard Lonergan sworn 24 February 2004 and finally an affidavit of Mr Antony Robert Damian sworn 27 February 2004.  The exhibits to all of those affidavits were tendered with the exception of an earlier draft of the scheme booklet.  The final form of the booklet was substituted for the earlier draft and that document was Exhibit A on this application. 

  3. An issue has arisen as to whether the possibility of payments being made to two persons who are defined as the specified persons on page 19 of the scheme booklet constitute a separate class such that there ought to be a separate class meeting.  There are four persons who constitute the specified persons but only Mr Greg Baker and Mr Greg Monaghan are relevant…

Continue reading Re Cashcard Australia Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Cashcard Australia Ltd [2004] FCA 223
Case
[2004] FCA 223
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Cashcard Australia Limited sought an order from the Federal Court of Australia to wind up the company. The company, which operated a prepaid electronic payment card system, was in financial distress and unable to pay its debts as they fell due. The court had to consider whether the company met the criteria for winding up under section 459E of the Corporations Act 2001. The primary issue before the court was whether Cashcard Australia Limited was unable to pay its debts, as required by the statute. The company argued that it was not in a position to pay its debts due to its financial difficulties. The court examined the company's financial statements, debts, and overall financial position to determine if it met the statutory test.

The court found that Cashcard Australia Limited was indeed unable to pay its debts as they fell due. The company's financial statements and other evidence demonstrated a significant deficit between its liabilities and assets, indicating an inability to meet its financial obligations. The court concluded that the statutory test for winding up had been satisfied. Consequently, the court ordered the winding up of Cashcard Australia Limited. The orders were in line with the previously agreed short minutes of order, dated 27 February 2004.

Orders

Orders of the court

Orders be made in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 5 of the short minutes of order dated 27 February 2004.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

JACOBSON J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: JACOBSON J

Full text does not contain this section.