Re Amcom Telecommunications Limited (No 3)
Case
•
[2015] FCA 596
•16 June 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Amcom Telecommunications Limited (No 3) [2015] FCA 596
[2015] FCA 596
16 June 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Amcom Telecommunications Limited applied to the Federal Court for orders approving a scheme of arrangement involving the divestment of Vocus' shares in Amcom. The application included a request for supplementary disclosure concerning the divestment. The case involved several legal issues, including whether the court should permit the despatch of a supplementary disclosure statement, whether the scheme meeting should be reconvened, whether the notice of scheme meeting remains valid, and whether the votes of certain entities should be tagged.
The court found that the scheme meeting had been adjourned for more than a month, which required the issuance of a new notice of meeting. However, the court also had discretion under s 1319 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to make orders that would otherwise contravene the company’s Constitution. The court approved the supplementary explanatory statement and allowed the notice of meeting to remain valid. The court also deemed valid proxy forms lodged by shareholders unless revoked and exempted the plaintiff from compliance with certain procedural rules.
The court made orders approving the supplementary explanatory statement, reconvening the scheme meeting, deeming the notice of meeting to still be valid, deeming valid proxy forms lodged by shareholders unless revoked, and exempting the plaintiff from compliance with certain procedural rules. The proceeding was adjourned to 23 June 2015 for the hearing of an application to approve the scheme.
The court found that the scheme meeting had been adjourned for more than a month, which required the issuance of a new notice of meeting. However, the court also had discretion under s 1319 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to make orders that would otherwise contravene the company’s Constitution. The court approved the supplementary explanatory statement and allowed the notice of meeting to remain valid. The court also deemed valid proxy forms lodged by shareholders unless revoked and exempted the plaintiff from compliance with certain procedural rules.
The court made orders approving the supplementary explanatory statement, reconvening the scheme meeting, deeming the notice of meeting to still be valid, deeming valid proxy forms lodged by shareholders unless revoked, and exempting the plaintiff from compliance with certain procedural rules. The proceeding was adjourned to 23 June 2015 for the hearing of an application to approve the scheme.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
Legal Concepts
-
Contract Formation
-
Breach of Contract
-
Implied Terms
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Discovery & Disclosure
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Platinum Capital Limited, in the matter of Platinum Capital Limited (No 2) [2025] FCA 925
Cases Citing This Decision
38
In the matter of The Trust Company (Re Services) Limited as responsible entity of the VitalHarvest Freehold Trust (No 2)
[2021] NSWSC 397
Re Alto Metals Ltd
[2024] WASC 455
PNX Metals Ltd [No 2]
[2024] WASC 335
Cases Cited
23
Statutory Material Cited
1
Re Amcom Telecommunications Ltd
[2015] FCA 341
Re Amcom Telecommunications Ltd (No 2)
[2015] FCA 410