Re Firefly Resources Ltd

Case [2021] WASC 376


JURISDICTION     :   SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

CITATION:   FIREFLY RESOURCES LIMITED [2021] WASC 376

CORAM:   STRK J

HEARD:   6 SEPTEMBER 2021 & 15 OCTOBER 2021

DELIVERED          :   6 SEPTEMBER 2021

PUBLISHED           :   22 NOVEMBER 2021

FILE NO/S:   COR 143 of 2021

MATTER:   IN THE MATTER OF FIREFLY RESOURCES LIMITED

EX PARTE

FIREFLY RESOURCES LIMITED

Plaintiff

GASCOYNE RESOURCES LIMITED

Interested Party


Catchwords:

Corporations law - Scheme of arrangement - Proposed share acquisition - Application for orders convening a scheme meeting under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 411(1) - Whether requirements to order scheme meeting are satisfied - Orders made convening scheme meeting - Distribution of scheme booklet containing the explanatory statement required by the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 412(1)(a) approved - Ancillary orders

Corporations law - Scheme of arrangement - Application for orders to dispatch supplementary scheme booklet to shareholders - Application to postpone scheme meeting - Whether court should give leave to dispatch a supplementary scheme booklet - Whether scheme meeting should be postponed - Ancillary orders

Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 411(1), s 412(1)(a), s 1319
Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth), sch 8
Supreme Court (Corporations) (WA) Rules 2004 (WA), r 3.2

Result:

Application granted
Orders made convening scheme meeting
Dispatch of supplementary scheme booklet and postponement of scheme meeting approved

Category:    B

Representation:

Counsel:

Plaintiff : A J Papamatheos and S P Tomasich
Interested Party : S Nadalo and J Sippe

Solicitors:

Plaintiff : HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
Interested Party : Herbert Smith Freehills

Case(s) referred to in decision(s):

Amcom Telecommunications Limited, in the matter of Amcom Telecommunications Limited (No 2) [2015] FCA 410

Amcom Telecommunications Limited, in the matter of Amcom Telecommunications Limited (No 3) [2015] FCA 596

Anatolia Energy Limited, in the matter of Anatolia Energy Limited [2015] FCA 1134

APN News & Media Limited, in the matter of APN News & Media Limited [2007] FCA 770; (2007) 62 ACSR 400

Associated Advisory Practices Ltd, in the matter of Associated Advisory Practices Limited (No 2) [2013] FCA 979

Aurora Oil & Gas Ltd, in the matter of Aurora Oil & Gas Ltd [2014] FCA 612

Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Limited [1993] HCA 15; (1993) 177 CLR 485

Cleary v Australian Cooperative Foods Ltd (Nos 2 and 3) (1999) 32 ACSR 701

Creso Pharma Limited [2019] WASC 472

Diversa Limited, in the matter of Diversa Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 1142

Excelsior Gold Limited; Re Excelsior Gold Limited [2018] FCA 2064

Felix Resources Pty Ltd; in the matter of Felix Resources Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCA 1337

First Pacific Advisors LLC v Boart Longyear Ltd [2017] NSWCA 116

In the matter of Lend Lease Primelife Ltd, In the matter of Lend Lease Village Responsible Entity Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1340

In the matter of Pulse Health Limited [2017] NSWSC 653

Nexus Energy Ltd, in the matter of Nexus Energy Ltd [2014] FCA 558

Piedmont Lithium Ltd [2021] WASC 76

Re Advance Bank Australia Limited (1997) 136 FLR 281

Re Aspen Group Ltd

Continue reading Re Firefly Resources Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Firefly Resources Ltd [2021] WASC 376
Case
[2021] WASC 376
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Firefly Resources Ltd was the subject of a proposed share acquisition scheme of arrangement under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The matter came before the Federal Court, which was tasked with determining whether certain orders were appropriate to facilitate the proposed acquisition. Specifically, the court was asked to convene a scheme meeting under s 411(1) of the Act, approve the distribution of a scheme booklet, and consider ancillary matters such as the dispatch of a supplementary scheme booklet and the postponement of the scheme meeting.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the requirements to order a scheme meeting were satisfied and, if so, whether additional steps such as the distribution of a supplementary scheme booklet and the postponement of the scheme meeting were appropriate. The court needed to consider whether the proposed scheme was in the best interests of the company and its shareholders and whether the necessary procedural requirements had been met.

The court found that the requirements to order a scheme meeting were satisfied, and thus granted the orders convening the meeting. The court also approved the distribution of a scheme booklet containing the explanatory statement required by s 412(1)(a) of the Act. Additionally, the court granted leave for the dispatch of a supplementary scheme booklet to shareholders, finding that it was necessary to provide further information to ensure that shareholders were fully informed. The court further ordered that the scheme meeting be postponed to allow time for the supplementary booklet to be distributed. These decisions were made in the interest of ensuring that shareholders were provided with all necessary information and had an opportunity to consider the proposed scheme fully.

The final orders of the court included convening the scheme meeting on a specified date, approving the distribution of the scheme booklet and the supplementary scheme booklet, and postponing the scheme meeting to a later date to allow for the distribution of the supplementary booklet. The court's decisions were aimed at ensuring that the scheme of arrangement was conducted in a fair and transparent manner, in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.