Re Tawana Resources NL (No 2)

Link copied
Case Copied 17 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Tawana Resources NL, in the matter of Tawana Resources NL (No 2) [2018] FCA 1724

File number: WAD 349 of 2018
Judge: BANKS-SMITH J
Date of judgment: 8 November 2018
Date of publication of reasons: 12 November 2018
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - scheme of arrangement - supplementary disclosure - orders to reconvene meeting and despatch supplementary booklet
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 411, 1319
Cases cited:

Amcom Telecommunications Limited, in the matter of Amcom Telecommunications Limited (No 2) [2015] FCA 410

Amcom Telecommunications Limited, in the matter of Amcom Telecommunications Limited (No 3) [2015] FCA 596

Associated Advisory Practices Limited, in the matter of Associated Advisory Practices Limited (No 2) [2013] FCA 979

Coates Hire Limited No 2, in the matter of Coates Hire Limited [2007] FCA 2105

CSR Limited, in the matter of CSR Limited [2010] FCAFC 34; (2010) 183 FCR 358

In the Matter of the Trust Company Limited [2013] NSWSC 1946

Kasbah Resources Limited, in the matter of Kasbah Resources Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 1518

Nexus Energy Ltd, in the matter of Nexus Energy Ltd [2014] FCA 558

Seven Network Limited, in the matter of Seven Network Limited (No 2) [2010] FCA 355

Tawana Resources NL, in the matter of Tawana Resources NL [2018] FCA 1456

Date of hearing: 8 November 2018
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 43
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr AJ Papamatheos
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: King & Wood Mallesons

ORDERS

WAD 349 of 2018

IN THE MATTER OF TAWANA RESOURCES NL (ACN 085 166 721)

TAWANA RESOURCES NL (ACN 085 166 721)

Plaintiff

JUDGE:

BANKS-SMITH J

DATE OF ORDER:

8 NOVEMBER 2018

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.As to the orders of the Court made on 17 August 2018 in this proceeding (August Orders):

(a)orders 12 and 13 are vacated; and

(b)those orders be supplemented, varied or otherwise vacated, as applicable, in accordance with paras 2 to 13 below.

2.Pursuant to s 411(1) and s 1319 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), the supplementary explanatory statement in a form substantially equivalent to the form that is annexure HFL-27 (Supplementary Scheme Booklet) to the affidavit of Heath Ford Lewis sworn and filed in this proceeding on 7 November 2018 (Sixth Lewis Affidavit) (and such amendments as approved by the Court on 8 November 2018), together with (as applicable) a proxy form or a South African-specific proxy form, and a foreign resident declaration form in respect of the scheme meeting being substantially in the form contained in annexure HFL-26 to the Sixth Lewis Affidavit (together, the Documents), are approved for despatch to the Tawana shareholders who appear on the Tawana register of members as at the close of the register on 6 November 2018, by 12 November 2018.

3.The Documents be despatched to shareholders in the manner set out in paras 10(a), 10(b)…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Re Tawana Resources NL (No 2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FCA 1724
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the case of Re Tawana Resources NL (No 2) involved Tawana Resources NL, a mining company, and its shareholders. The primary dispute centred on the implementation of a scheme of arrangement under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Tawana Resources sought to proceed with the scheme after the initial meeting was adjourned due to insufficient supplementary disclosure to the shareholders. The shareholders, in turn, raised concerns about the adequacy of the information provided and the timing of the reconvened meeting.

The court had to decide whether the additional disclosure required by the shareholders necessitated further adjournment of the scheme meeting or if the scheme could proceed with the supplementary information provided. The legal issues revolved around the appropriateness of proceeding with the scheme under section 411 of the Corporations Act, the necessity of the supplementary disclosure, and whether the reconvened meeting could be held within the timeframe stipulated by the court.

In its ruling, the court found that the additional disclosure did not fundamentally alter the circumstances that led to the initial decision to approve the scheme. The court was satisfied that the supplementary explanatory statement, along with other required documents, would adequately inform the shareholders. Consequently, the court concluded that the scheme should proceed, and it was appropriate to reconvene the meeting. The court then issued orders to dispatch the supplementary booklet to shareholders and reconvene the meeting, setting out the procedural details for the reconvened meeting and the voting process.

The final orders included the approval of the supplementary explanatory statement and related documents for despatch to shareholders, reconvening the scheme meeting, and specifying the voting rights and procedures. The court also detailed the notice requirements and exempted the plaintiff from certain procedural rules. The proceeding was adjourned to allow for the hearing of the application to approve the scheme.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. As to the orders of the Court made on 17 August 2018 in this proceeding (August Orders):

(a) orders 12 and 13 are vacated; and

(b) those orders be supplemented, varied or otherwise vacated, as applicable, in accordance with paras 2 to 13 below.

2. Pursuant to s 411(1) and s 1319 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), the supplementary explanatory statement in a form substantially equivalent to the form that is annexure HFL-27 (Supplementary Scheme Booklet) to the affidavit of Heath Ford Lewis sworn and filed in this proceeding on 7 November 2018 (Sixth Lewis Affidavit) (and such amendments as approved by the Court on 8 November 2018), together with (as applicable) a proxy form or a South African-specific proxy form, and a foreign resident declaration form in respect of the scheme meeting being substantially in the form contained in annexure HFL-26 to the Sixth Lewis Affidavit (together, the Documents), are approved for despatch to the Tawana shareholders who appear on the Tawana register of members as at the close of the register on 6 November 2018, by 12 November 2018.

3. The Documents be despatched to shareholders in the manner set out in paras 10(a), 10(b) and 10(c) of the August Orders.

4. Despatch of the documents referred to in para 2 of these orders in accordance with para 3 of these orders is to be taken to be sufficient notice of the scheme meeting.

5. Pursuant to s 1319 of the Act, the scheme meeting be reconvened at 10.00 am (AWST) on 27 November 2018 at the offices of King & Wood Mallesons, Level 30, QV.1 Building, 250 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia.

6. At the scheme meeting each shareholder present and entitled to vote, will be entitled to one vote for each fully paid ordinary share in the capital of the plaintiff that the shareholder is registered as holding at 10.00 am (AWST) on 25 November 2018.

7. The reconvened scheme meeting is to be convened, held and conducted in accordance with:

(a) subject to para (b) below, paras 2 to 7 of the August Orders; and

(b) the notice of meeting in the form or to the effect of the notice contained in Annexure C to the Supplementary Scheme Booklet.

8. The time by which shareholders must return their proxy forms for the reconvened scheme meeting is 10.00 am (AWST) on 25 November 2018.

9. Valid proxy forms for the scheme meeting that have been lodged by shareholders are deemed to still be valid provided that the shareholder continues to be a registered shareholder as at 10.00 am (AWST) on 25 November 2018 and unless:

(a) the proxy form has been withdrawn;

(b) the proxy form has been revoked; or

(c) a new proxy form is submitted by the same shareholder, which will be taken to revoke any previously submitted proxy form,

shareholders who voted in favour of the scheme are deemed to have voted in favour of the resolutions to be considered at the reconvened scheme meeting.

10. The plaintiff is to give notice of the hearing of the application pursuant to s 411(4) of the Act and that notice of the hearing of an application pursuant to s 411(4)(b) of the Act for orders approving the scheme be published once in the public notices column of The Australian and The West Australian newspapers substantially in the form of Annexure A to these orders, such advertisement to be published on or before 28 November 2018 and the plaintiff be otherwise exempted from compliance with r 3.4 of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth).

11. The proceeding be adjourned to 3 December 2018 at 2.15 pm for the hearing of an application to approve the scheme.

12. There be liberty to apply upon the giving of 48 hours notice to ASIC.

13. An office copy of these orders shall be lodged with ASIC as soon as practicable after these orders are made.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

It is not apparent to me that any of the matters that have required disclosure, nor the need to extend the time for the convening of the meeting, should influence my original view as expressed at the first court hearing that it is appropriate that the scheme proceed to be considered by the shareholders.Conclusion For those reasons, I was willing to make the orders sought.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.