-
IMCC Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v CB Cold Storage Pty Ltd
[2017] VSCA 178
Citation 1
(Para 1)
…and the Lessor, a conclusion which is inescapable in the present circumstances.[41] [40]Cf IMCC Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v CB Cold Storage Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 178 and the grant of leave to appeal at [3]. [41] Raptis v City of Melbourne [2017] VSC 247, [40]–[52].…
-
Quach v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2)
[2015] NSWCA 311
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…ff medical practitioner filed notices of motion seeking inter alia a stay of the Orders of NCAT and an extension of time for a merits appeal:[57] [56][2015] NSWCA 311 (“ Quach ”). [57][2015] NSWCA 311, [6]–[7], [9]–[12].…
-
Cicek v Estate of late Solomon
[2014] NSWCA 278
Citation 3
…[29][2014] NSWCA 278, [130].…
-
Reimers v Health Care Complaints Commission
[2013] NSWCA 366
Citation 4
(Para 23)
…n informed of that fact, or of a procedural defect in the formulation of their claim: Reimers v Health Care Complaints Commission [2013] NSWCA 366 at [23] per Barrett JA (Macfarlan and Meagher JJA agreeing). See also Martin v State of New South Wales (No 6) [2011] NSWCA 281 at [8]. 11.Whilst the decision of the Pra…
-
Martin v State of New South Wales (No 6)
[2011] NSWCA 281
Citation 5
(Para 8)
…n [2013] NSWCA 366 at [23] per Barrett JA (Macfarlan and Meagher JJA agreeing). See also Martin v State of New South Wales (No 6) [2011] NSWCA 281 at [8]. 11.Whilst the decision of the Practitioner to file the notices of motion might have been excused on account of his lack of legal expertise, no such allowance sho…
-
Trevor Roller Shutter Service Pty Ltd v Crowe
[2011] VSCA 16
Citation 6
…[95] Trevor Roller Shutter Service Pty Ltd v Crowe (2011) 31 VR 249 at 259–60 [39].…
-
Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2010] FCA 1516
Citation 7
(Para 1)
…erations because the applicable law does not have the same wholesale rejection of jury trials which is found in the federal legislation. [91] Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd (2010) 189 FCR 173 at 178 [22].…
-
Macedon Ranges Shire Council v Thompson
[2009] VSCA 209
Citation 8
(Para 1)
…Sun Alliance Life Assurance Australia Ltd [2000] NSWSC 159, [13]; cited with apparent approval in Vink v Tuckwell (2008) 67 ACSR 547 at 565 [104]; Macedon Ranges Shire Council v Thompson (2009) LGERA 41 at 50 [17].…
-
Vink v Tuckwell
[2008] VSCA 204
Citation 9
(Para 1)
…o standard costs orders.[35] [32] Raptis v City of Melbourne [2017] VSC 247, [62] extracted above at [4]. [33] Supreme Court Act 1986 s 24(1). [34] Vink v Tuckwell (2008) 67 ACSR 547. [35]See e.g. Bhagat v Royal and Sun Alliance Life Assurance Australia Ltd [2000] NSWSC 159, [13]; cited with apparent approval in Vink v T…
-
Spotless Group Ltd v Premier Building and Consulting Pty Ltd
[2008] VSCA 115
Citation 10
(Para 1)
…e’s exercise of discretion is required:[19] [17] Supreme Court Act 1986 s 17A(2). [18] Spotless Group Ltd v Premier Building and Consulting Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 115 (“ Spotless ”). [19] Spotless Group Ltd v Premier Building and Consulting Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 115, [10]–[11].…
-
Salfinger v Niugini Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 4)
[2007] FCA 1594
Citation 11
…[53][2007] FCA 1594.…
-
Spalla v St George Motor Finance Ltd (No 8)
[2006] FCA 1537
Citation 12
(Para 26)
…107.Further in Salfinger v Niugini Mining (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 4) ,[53] Heerey J said as follows:[54] 7.In Spalla v St George Motor Finance Ltd [2006] FCA 1537 Kenny J at [26] recently noted that courts have from time to time overcome a reluctance to order indemnity costs against self-represented litigants: Bha…
-
Ogawa v The University of Melbourne (No 2)
[2004] FCA 1275
Citation 13
(Para 57)
…itigant. These judgments were cited with approval by Kenny J in Ogawa v University of Melbourne (No 2) .[51] [50][2002] FCA 223 at [57]–[60]. [51][2004] FCA 1275. 106.In Spalla v St George Motor Finance (No 8) ,[52] Kenny J said: [52]At [26]. 26.From time to time the courts overcome their reluctance to order indem…
-
Clarke v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
[2002] FCA 75
Citation 14
(Para 18)
…ipal Council v Connor (1991) 24 NSWLR 724; Monitronix Ltd v Michael (1992) 7 WAR 195; Ugly Tribe Company Pty Ltd v Sikola [2001] VSC 189 at [18]; Clarke v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 50 ATR 173. [45] Aljade and MKIC v OCBC [2004] VSC 351.…
-
Gerlach v Clifton Bricks Pty Ltd
[2002] HCA 22
Citation 15
(Para 1)
…t to trials with juries and do not turn on the facts of a particular case, they ought not to be considered. [99] Gerlach v Clifton Bricks Pty Ltd (2002) 209 CLR 478 at 485 [10].…
-
Bhagat v Global Custodians Ltd
[2002] FCA 223
Citation 16
(Para 57)
…y costs against the unrepresented litigant. These judgments were cited with approval by Kenny J in Ogawa v University of Melbourne (No 2) .[51] [50][2002] FCA 223 at [57]–[60]. [51][2004] FCA 1275. 106.In Spalla v St George Motor Finance (No 8) ,[52] Kenny J said: [52]At [26]. 26.From time to time the courts over…
-
Cheng v The Queen
[2000] HCA 53
Citation 17
(Para 1)
…2001) 282–5. [110] Re Colina; Ex parte Torney (1999) 200 CLR 386, 396–7, [23]–[24] and the authorities cited there; Cheng v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 248; and see Amelia Simpson and Mary Wood ‘“A Puny Thing Indeed”— Cheng v The Queen and the Constitutional Right to Trial by Jury’ (2001) 29(1) Federal Law Review 95.…
-
Kay v Attorney-General
[2000] VSCA 176
Citation 18
…[26][1999] 2 VR 436 at 457.…
-
Graham Evans Pty Ltd v Stencraft Pty Ltd
[1999] FCA 1670
Citation 19
…[93]See Pezzimenti v Seamer [1995] 2 VR 32, 38, 40.…
-
Etna v Arif
[1999] VSCA 99
Citation 20
…[22]See, for example, Whiteman v Johnson [1995] 2 VR 637 at 639–40 (Phillips JA); ETNA v ARIF [1999] 2 VR 353.…
-
Bhagat v Royal and Sun Alliance Life Assurance Australia Ltd
[2000] NSWSC 159
Citation 21
(Para 1)
…Supreme Court Act 1986 s 24(1). [34] Vink v Tuckwell (2008) 67 ACSR 547. [35]See e.g. Bhagat v Royal and Sun Alliance Life Assurance Australia Ltd [2000] NSWSC 159, [13]; cited with apparent approval in Vink v Tuckwell (2008) 67 ACSR 547 at 565 [104]; Macedon Ranges Shire Council v Thompson (2009) LGERA 41 at 50 […
-
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11
Citation 22
(Para 44)
…pe of “delinquency“ said to justify an order for the payment of costs on an indemnity basis: Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; 193 CLR 72 at [44]. 12.The Commission by its letter of 18 June 2015 informed the Practitioner of the unlikelihood of his success in pursuing his claims for interlocutory re…
-
Neil v Nott
[1994] HCA 23
Citation 23
…Ltd (Ruling No 8) (2012) 35 VR 643 – Quach v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 311 – Neil v Nott (1994) 68 ALJR 509 – Commonwealth Constitution 1901 s 80 – Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 r 47.02…
-
McCauley v McCauley
[1910] HCA 16
Citation 24
…[21] McCauley v McCauley (1910) 10 CLR 434 at 455 (Isaacs J).…
-
Wentworth v Rogers & Anor
[2007] HCATrans 747
Citation 25
…[25] Wentworth v Rogers [No 3] (1986) 6 NSWLR 642 at 644.…
-
Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd
[2010] FCA 981
Citation 26
(Para 1)
…does not have the same wholesale rejection of jury trials which is found in the federal legislation. [91] Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd (2010) 189 FCR 173 at 178 [22].…
-
Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc v Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd
[1991] FCA 150
Citation 27
…y Ltd v Australian Builders Labourers’ Federated Union of Workers (WA Branch) (No 2) (1993) 46 IR 301. [44] Hurstville Municipal Council v Connor (1991) 24 NSWLR 724; Monitronix Ltd v Michael (1992) 7 WAR 195; Ugly Tribe Company Pty Ltd v Sikola [2001] VSC 189 at [18]; Clarke v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 5…
-
Raptis v City of Melbourne
[2017] VSC 247
Citation 28
(Para 1)
…applies to self-represented litigants which displaces this usual position in relation to standard costs orders.[35] [32] Raptis v City of Melbourne [2017] VSC 247, [62] extracted above at [4]. [33] Supreme Court Act 1986 s 24(1). [34] Vink v Tuckwell (2008) 67 ACSR 547. [35]See e.g. Bhagat v Royal and Sun Allianc…
-
Roland Von Marburg v Aldred
[2016] VSC 565
Citation 29
(Para 1)
…plied these principles in Marburg v Aldred and found that the following factors were relevant to the exercise of discretion under r 47.02(2):[94] [94][2016] VSC 565, [62]–[63].…
-
Weber v Deakin University
[2016] VSC 147
Citation 30
(Para 1)
…f such appeals Re Ascot Vale Self-Storage Centre Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (2014) 98 ACSR 243 at 245–9, [8]–[18]. [13] Weber v Deakin University [2016] VSC 147 (“ Weber v Deakin University ”). [14][2014] VSC 317. [15][1981] VR 539. [16] Weber v Deakin University [2016] VSC 147, [26]–[31], but see [25].…
-
Mainstream Construction (Aust) Pty Ltd v Carr Electrical Pty Ltd
[2014] VSC 317
Citation 31
(Para 1)
…(in liquidation) (2014) 98 ACSR 243 at 245–9, [8]–[18]. [13] Weber v Deakin University [2016] VSC 147 (“ Weber v Deakin University ”). [14][2014] VSC 317. [15][1981] VR 539. [16] Weber v Deakin University [2016] VSC 147, [26]–[31], but see [25].…
-
Re Ascot Vale Self-Storage Centre Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
[2014] VSC 75
Citation 32
(Para 1)
…al v Carson [2013] VSC 355, [11]; and see generally regarding the nature of such appeals Re Ascot Vale Self-Storage Centre Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (2014) 98 ACSR 243 at 245–9, [8]–[18]. [13] Weber v Deakin University [2016] VSC 147 (“ Weber v Deakin University ”). [14][2014] VSC 317. [15][1981] VR 539. [16] Weber v…
-
Pasqualotto v Pasqualotto (No 2)
[2013] VSC 608
Citation 33
(Para 8)
…[88][2013] VSC 608 at [8].…
-
Oswal v Carson
[2013] VSC 355
Citation 34
(Para 1)
…eal against an Associate Justice’s decision on costs be heard. [12] Neely v Southern Cross Feeds Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] VSC 238, [5]; Oswal v Carson [2013] VSC 355, [11]; and see generally regarding the nature of such appeals Re Ascot Vale Self-Storage Centre Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (2014) 98 ACSR 243 at 245–9, […
-
Neely v Southern Cross Feeds Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2013] VSC 238
Citation 35
(Para 1)
…that leave be granted before an appeal against an Associate Justice’s decision on costs be heard. [12] Neely v Southern Cross Feeds Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] VSC 238, [5]; Oswal v Carson [2013] VSC 355, [11]; and see generally regarding the nature of such appeals Re Ascot Vale Self-Storage Centre Pty Ltd (in liquida…
-
Deka v Johns
[2009] VSC 296
Citation 36
…[92] Deka v Johns [2009] VSC 296, [6](d)–(e), [13].…
-
Vink v Tuckwell (No 3)
[2008] VSC 316
Citation 37
(Para 1)
…orders.[35] [32] Raptis v City of Melbourne [2017] VSC 247, [62] extracted above at [4]. [33] Supreme Court Act 1986 s 24(1). [34] Vink v Tuckwell (2008) 67 ACSR 547. [35]See e.g. Bhagat v Royal and Sun Alliance Life Assurance Australia Ltd [2000] NSWSC 159, [13]; cited with apparent approval in Vink v Tuckwell (200…
-
Aljade and MKIC v OCBC
[2004] VSC 351
Citation 38
…ly Tribe Company Pty Ltd v Sikola [2001] VSC 189 at [18]; Clarke v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 50 ATR 173. [45] Aljade and MKIC v OCBC [2004] VSC 351.…
-
Ugly Tribe Co Pty Ltd v Sikola
[2001] VSC 189
Citation 39
(Para 18)
…1. [44] Hurstville Municipal Council v Connor (1991) 24 NSWLR 724; Monitronix Ltd v Michael (1992) 7 WAR 195; Ugly Tribe Company Pty Ltd v Sikola [2001] VSC 189 at [18]; Clarke v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 50 ATR 173. [45] Aljade and MKIC v OCBC [2004] VSC 351.…