-
R v Stewart
[2010] SASCFC 72
Citation 1
(Para 31)
…of guilt and he can be held to that even if he is not in truth guilty of the offence.[19] [19] Meissner v R (1995) 184 CLR 132 at p 141, R v Stewart [2010] SASCFC 72…
-
Police v Sherlock
[2009] SASC 64
Citation 2
(Para 22)
…378 at 392-3 [10] Rogers v R (1994) 181 CLR 251 at 255, Subramaniam v R (2004) 79 ALJR 116 at [26-7], Police v Sherlock [2009] SASC 64 at [46, [68] [11] Subramaniam, Sherlock (supra) [12] Sherlock (supra) [13] Moevao v Dept of Labour [1980] 1 NZLR 464 at 481-2, Jago v District Court of NSW (1989) 168 CLR 23 at 29…
-
Sedmak v Police
[2008] SASC 307
Citation 3
(Para 23)
…f charges of serious offences;[17] [16] Williams v Spautz supra, at 529 [17] Rona v District Court of SA (1995) 63 SASR 223 at 230, Sedmak v Police [2008] SASC 307, R v Bunting & Others (No 2) (2003) 230 LSJS 397 Arguments of Counsel…
-
R v D
[2008] NZCA 267
Citation 4
(Para 18)
…refuse to extend the leniency that might be extended if the offences for which the offender is convicted were isolated. [6] (2010) 107 SASR 405 [7] (1997) 69 SASR 413…
-
Subramaniam v The Queen
[2004] HCA 51
Citation 5
(Para 22)
…esort;[15] [9] Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 at 392-3 [10] Rogers v R (1994) 181 CLR 251 at 255, Subramaniam v R (2004) 79 ALJR 116 at [26-7], Police v Sherlock [2009] SASC 64 at [46, [68] [11] Subramaniam, Sherlock (supra) [12] Sherlock (supra) [13] Moevao v Dept of Labour [1980] 1 NZLR 464 at 481-2, Jago v D…
-
Button v Chapman
[2003] FCA 861
Citation 6
(Para 22)
…ially; ·the power is to be used only in the most exceptional circumstances, as a last resort;[15] [9] Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 at 392-3 [10] Rogers v R (1994) 181 CLR 251 at 255, Subramaniam v R (2004) 79 ALJR 116 at [26-7], Police v Sherlock [2009] SASC 64 at [46, [68] [11] Subramaniam, Sherlock (supra)…
-
Nicholas v The Queen
[1998] HCA 9
Citation 7
(Para 22)
…of NSW (1989) 168 CLR 23 at 29-30, Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 at 520; Walton v Gardiner (supra), Nicholas v R (1998) 193 CLR 173 at 256 [14] R v Gagliardi & Filippidis (1987) 45 SASR 418 at 433, R v Vuckov & Romeo (1986) 40 SASR 498 at 521-522, Jago (supra) at 49 [15] Jago (supra) at 31, 34, 60, 77, Sherloc…
-
Meissner v the Queen
[1995] HCA 41
Citation 8
(Para 31)
…undone. His pleas amount to an admission of guilt and he can be held to that even if he is not in truth guilty of the offence.[19] [19] Meissner v R (1995) 184 CLR 132 at p 141, R v Stewart [2010] SASCFC 72…
-
Ridgeway v the Queen
[1995] HCA 66
Citation 9
(Para 23)
…timate public interest in the disposition of charges of serious offences;[17] [16] Williams v Spautz supra, at 529 [17] Rona v District Court of SA (1995) 63 SASR 223 at 230, Sedmak v Police [2008] SASC 307, R v Bunting & Others (No 2) (2003) 230 LSJS 397 Arguments of Counsel…
-
Rogers v The Queen
[1994] HCA 42
Citation 10
(Para 22)
…most exceptional circumstances, as a last resort;[15] [9] Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 at 392-3 [10] Rogers v R (1994) 181 CLR 251 at 255, Subramaniam v R (2004) 79 ALJR 116 at [26-7], Police v Sherlock [2009] SASC 64 at [46, [68] [11] Subramaniam, Sherlock (supra) [12] Sherlock (supra) [13] Moevao v Dept of…
-
Walton v Gardiner
[1993] HCA 77
Citation 11
(Para 22)
…be exercised judicially; ·the power is to be used only in the most exceptional circumstances, as a last resort;[15] [9] Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 at 392-3 [10] Rogers v R (1994) 181 CLR 251 at 255, Subramaniam v R (2004) 79 ALJR 116 at [26-7], Police v Sherlock [2009] SASC 64 at [46, [68] [11] Subramaniam, Sherl…
-
Williams v Spautz
[1992] HCA 34
Citation 12
(Para 22)
…v Dept of Labour [1980] 1 NZLR 464 at 481-2, Jago v District Court of NSW (1989) 168 CLR 23 at 29-30, Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 at 520; Walton v Gardiner (supra), Nicholas v R (1998) 193 CLR 173 at 256 [14] R v Gagliardi & Filippidis (1987) 45 SASR 418 at 433, R v Vuckov & Romeo (1986) 40 SASR 498 at 521-5…
-
Jago v District Court (NSW)
[1989] HCA 46
Citation 13
(Para 22)
…ock (supra) [12] Sherlock (supra) [13] Moevao v Dept of Labour [1980] 1 NZLR 464 at 481-2, Jago v District Court of NSW (1989) 168 CLR 23 at 29-30, Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 at 520; Walton v Gardiner (supra), Nicholas v R (1998) 193 CLR 173 at 256 [14] R v Gagliardi & Filippidis (1987) 45 SASR 418 at 433,…