R v Weiss

Case [2022] NSWDC 619


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Weiss [2022] NSWDC 619
Hearing dates: 17 November 2022
Date of orders: 9 December 2022
Decision date: 09 December 2022
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Fitzsimmons SC DCJ
Decision:

(1) In respect of the offences to which the offender has pleaded guilty, the offender is convicted.

(2) The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of ten months commencing 9 December 2022 and expiring on 8 October 2023.

(3) Pursuant to s 20 (1)(b) of the Crimes Act, the offender is to be released forthwith on the condition that the offender enters into a recognizance, self, in the sum of $1000, subject to the following conditions:

(a) The offender is to be of good behaviour for 18 months.

(b) The offender is to pay a pecuniary penalty of $20,000.

(4) If the offender fails to comply with the recognizance, she will be returned to court and face the prospect of forfeiting the sum of $1000 and being taken into custody to serve the specified sentence.

Catchwords:

CRIME – sentencing – falsification of books – recognizance – released forthwith

Legislation Cited:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1307(1)

Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), Pt 1B, ss 4K, 16BA, 16A, 17A, 19AC (1), 19AC (4), 20(1)(b)

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 53A

Cases Cited:

Attorney General’s Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146

Bui v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (2012) 244 CLR 638

Decision Restricted [2022] NSWCCA 24

Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 52

Johnson v The Queen (2004) 78 ALJR 616

Larkin v The Queen [2012] WASCA 238

Soyke v R [2016] NSWCCA 112

Totan v R [2022] NSWCCA 75; (2022) 400 ALR 578

Rich v ASIC (2014) 220 CLR 129

R v Rivkin (2004) 59 NSWLR 284

Category:Sentence
Parties: Rex
Adriana Benhamou Weiss
Representation:

Counsel:
A McGrath (Crown)
P Strickland SC and B Dean (Offender)

Solicitors:
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (Crown)
Company Giles (Offender)
File Number(s): 2021/316988
Publication restriction: Unrestricted

JUDGMENT

  1. The offender has pleaded guilty to three falsification of books offences contrary to s 1307 (1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (‘Corporations Act’).

  2. The maximum penalty for the offence at the time of offending was imprisonment for two years and/or 100 penalty units ($18,000).

  3. In addition, the offender requests that the court take into account three additional falsification of books offences, also contrary to s 1307 (1), on passing sentence in respect to the first count pursuant to s 16BA of the Crimes Act 1914 (“Crimes Act”).

  4. Both the representative of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions and the offender have signed the S 16BA form, as have I, and that document remains in the registry file.

  5. I certify that I have taken into account the additional offences, the subject of counts four, five and six attached to the form, pursuant to s 16BA.

  6. In…

Continue reading R v Weiss

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Weiss [2022] NSWDC 619
Case
[2022] NSWDC 619
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellant, Weiss, was brought before the court for sentencing in relation to charges of falsifying books. The court was required to determine the appropriate penalty for the appellant's admitted offences. The primary legal issue before the court was the formulation of a sentence that was both punitive and rehabilitative, considering the nature and circumstances of the offence.

The court deliberated on the various sentencing options available, including imprisonment, fines, and community service. It was noted that the appellant had pleaded guilty, which was a mitigating factor. However, the gravity of the offence, which involved significant dishonesty and breach of trust, necessitated a sentence that would also serve as a deterrent. After weighing these factors, the court decided that a term of imprisonment, coupled with a recognizance, would be the most appropriate course of action. The sentence was structured to ensure that the appellant would face both immediate and future consequences for their actions, while also providing an opportunity for rehabilitation through conditions such as good behaviour and financial penalties.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) In respect of the offences to which the offender has pleaded guilty, the offender is convicted.

(2) The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of ten months commencing 9 December 2022 and expiring on 8 October 2023.

(3) Pursuant to s 20 (1)(b) of the Crimes Act, the offender is to be released forthwith on the condition that the offender enters into a recognizance, self, in the sum of $1000, subject to the following conditions:

(a) The offender is to be of good behaviour for 18 months.

(b) The offender is to pay a pecuniary penalty of $20,000.

(4) If the offender fails to comply with the recognizance, she will be returned to court and face the prospect of forfeiting the sum of $1000 and being taken into custody to serve the specified sentence.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.