R v Weaver

Case [2020] NSWDC 556


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v WEAVER [2020] NSWDC 556
Hearing dates: 9 July 2020
Date of orders: 24 September 2020
Decision date: 24 September 2020
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Lerve DCJ
Decision:

Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years and 4 months, with non parole period of 2  years 7 months,

Catchwords:

CRIME – sentencing – possess 31 unregistered firearms including 7 prohibited firearms and one pistol not authorised by licence or permit – possess shortened firearm – weapons deliberately stockpiled in belief “in external threats” – general deterrence – strong subjective case - no previous offences – court not persuaded regarding issues of hardship to third parties or extra curial punishment

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, 1999

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, 1999

Criminal Procedure Act, 1986

Explosives Act, 2004

Firearms Act, 1996

Cases Cited:

Alameddinev R [2006] NSWCCA 317

Athos v R (2013) 83 NSWLR 224; [2013] NSWCCA 205

Atkinson v Coles supermarkets Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1063

Edwards v R (1996) 90 A Crim R 510

Einfieldv R (2010) 200 A Crim R 1

Hinton (2002) 134 A Crim R 286

Hopley v R [2008] NSWCCA 105

Kabir v R [2020] NSWCCA 139

Kember v R [2020] NSWCCA 152

Kenny v R [2010] NSWCCA 6

Laspina v R [2016] NSWCCA 181

Mack & Mack v R [2009] NSWCCA 216

Moodie v R [2020] NSWCCA 160

Nabalarua v R [2020] NSWCCA 68

Parente v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 633; [2017] NSWCCA 284

R v Byrne (1998) 104 A Crim R 456

R v Lachlan (2015) 252 A Crim R 277; [2015] NSWCCA 178

R v Smith & Campbell [2019] NSWCCA 1

Taitoko v R [2020] NSWCCA 43

Taylor v R [2018] NSWCCA 50

The Attorney Generals Application Under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, 1999 No. 1 of 2002 otherwise known as the Guideline Judgment on Form matters reportd (2002) 56 NSWLR 146.

Whybrowv R [2008] NSWCCA 270

Zerafa [2013] NSWCCA 222

Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Roger Byron WEAVER (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr J Glissan QC (for the Offender)

Solicitors:
Mr A Thomas (for the Crown)
Mr K Clowry (for the Offender)
File Number(s): 2019/240991
Publication restriction: No

REMARKS ON SENTENCE

  1. At the sentence hearing at the Wagga Wagga District Court on 9 July 2020 the offender pleaded guilty to two counts on an indictment (which was amended by consent in open court on 24 September 2020), namely that:

  1. (He) on 2 August 2019 at Adelong in the State of New South Wales, did possess more than three firearms, namely thirty-one firearms that were not registered, seven of which were prohibited firearms and one being a pistol, in circumstances where Roger Weaver was not a person authorised by a licence or permit to possess those firearms, contrary to s 51D(2) of the Firearms Act, 1996, and further

  2. (he) on 2 August…

Continue reading R v Weaver

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Weaver [2020] NSWDC 556
Case
[2020] NSWDC 556
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Weaver, the defendant was convicted of possessing 31 unregistered firearms, including seven prohibited firearms and one pistol not authorised by licence or permit. The defendant also possessed a shortened firearm. The stockpile of weapons was deliberate and motivated by a belief in external threats. The case reached the court for sentencing, where the primary legal issue was to determine an appropriate punishment that would achieve general deterrence while also considering the defendant's lack of previous offences and the circumstances of the stockpile.

The court examined the strong subjective case for general deterrence, given the significant number and nature of the unregistered firearms. The defendant's lack of previous criminal record was noted, but the court found that this did not mitigate the seriousness of the offences. The argument regarding hardship to third parties or extra curial punishment did not persuade the court. The stockpile was deliberate, and the weapons were kept with the intention of being used against perceived external threats.

The court ultimately decided on a sentence that balanced the need for general deterrence with the defendant's lack of previous offences. The defendant was sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of four years and four months, with a non-parole period of two years and seven months. This decision reflects the court's focus on the gravity of the offences and the need to deter similar conduct in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years and 4 months, with non parole period of 2 years 7 months,

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.