SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Case Title: | R v Rappel |
Citation: | [2017] ACTSC 38 |
Hearing Dates: | 18, 19 July and 5, 6, 7, 8 September 2016 |
DecisionDate: | 24 February 2017 |
Before: | Burns J |
Decision: | See [152]-[156] |
Catchwords: | CRIMINAL LAW – JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Judgment and Punishment – Sentence – offences against the person – murder – assault occasioning actual bodily harm – contravening a protection order – plea of guilty – disputed facts – intention – worst case – sentenced to terms of imprisonment. |
Legislation Cited: | Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) ss 12, 24 Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT) s 35(4) Evidence Act 2011 (ACT) s 65 |
Cases Cited: | Arthars v The Queen [2013] VSCA 258; 39 VR 613 Burrell v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 163; 196 A Crim R 199 R v Twala (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, 4 November 1994, unreported) |
Parties: | The Queen (Crown) Marcus Rappel (Offender) |
Representation: | Counsel Mr S Drumgold with Ms Christensen (Crown) Mr S Whybrow (Offender) |
| Solicitors ACT Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Ben Aulich and Associates (Offender) | |
File Number: | SCC 204 of 2015 |
BURNS J:
Marcus Rappel, on 3 March 2016 you were arraigned on an indictment dated 21 September 2015 and entered pleas of guilty to the following charges:
(a)Count 1 – alleging that on 28 February 2015 you murdered Tara Costigan;
(b)Count 2 – alleging that on the same date, being a person who had been personally served with a copy of a protection order, you did contravene a condition of that protection order; and
(c)Count 4 – alleging that on the same date you assaulted Bryce Bullman, thereby occasioning to him actual bodily harm.
On 18 July 2016, you were arraigned on and plead guilty to Count 3 on the same indictment, alleging that on 28 February 2015 you recklessly inflicted grievous bodily harm on Rikki Schmidt.
The offence of murder, contrary to s 12 of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) (the Crimes Act), carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm contrary to s 24 of the Crimes Act carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment. The offence of contravening a protection order carries a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment, a fine of $75,000 or both. The offence of recklessly inflicting grievous bodily harm carries a maximum penalty of 13 years imprisonment.
For the purposes of sentencing you it will be necessary to make findings of fact,…
Continue reading R v Rappel
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Rappel [2017] ACTSC 38
- Case
- [2017] ACTSC 38
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were the severity and nature of the offences, the defendant’s plea of guilty, and the disputed facts surrounding the incidents. The court needed to balance the principles of justice and deterrence with the defendant’s guilty plea and the need to provide a comprehensive sentence that reflected the seriousness of the crimes. Additionally, the court had to consider the impact of the protection order violation on the sentencing process.
In delivering the judgment, the court thoroughly examined the evidence and arguments presented. The court recognised the defendant’s guilty plea but also emphasised the gravity of the offences committed. The court found that the defendant’s actions were deliberate and violent, warranting a significant sentence. After considering all the evidence and legal principles, the court sentenced Rappel to terms of imprisonment for each offence, reflecting the severity and impact of the crimes. The final orders, as outlined in the judgment, specified the exact sentences imposed on the defendant.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [152]-[156]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.