Legal Research
Cases
R v Bandy

R v Bandy

Case [2018] ACTSC 261 14 September 2018

Type to search within this case.

SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

Case Title:	R v Bandy
Citation:	[2018] ACTSC 261
Hearing Dates:	14 May 2018 ; 27 August 2018
DecisionDate:	14 September 2018
Before:	Loukas-Karlsson J
Decision:	See [112].
Catchwords:	CRIMINAL LAW – JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Judgment and Punishment – Sentence – recklessly inflict grievous bodily harm – intensive corrections order assessment – where offender at a ‘crossroads’
Legislation Cited:	Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) s 20 Crimes (Sentencing) Act2005 (ACT) ss 6, 7, 10, 33 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act (1999) (NSW) s 22
Cases Cited:	Hili v the Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Hillier v DPP [2009] NSWCCA 312; 198 A Crim R 565 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 6 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Bartlett (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 51 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Cranfield [2017] ACTSC 171 R v Deng [2017] ACTSC 338 R v Dunn [2017] ACTSC 227 R v EL [2016] ACTSC 241 R v Hidic [2017] ACTSC 307 R v Hill [2016] ACTSC 310 R v Hopkins [2004] NSWCCA 105 R v Kepaoa [2017] ACTSC 414 R v Kepaoa (No 2) [2018] ACTSC 24 R v Laipato (Unreported, Nield AJ, 16 September 2010) R v LT [2017] ACTSC 343 R v McBride [2017] ACTSC 102 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR 566 R v McNeill [2018] ACTSC 125 R v Miller [2018] ACTSC 244 R v Myles [2017] ACTSC 194 R v Neish (Unreported, Refshauge J, 24 May 2013) R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; 5 A Crim R 394 R v Pallier [2017] ACTSC 112 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 550 R v Pumpa [2014] ACTSC 223 R v Rappel [2017] ACTSC 38 R v RC (Unreported, Burns J, 19 October 2012) R v Rheinberger [2016] ACTSC 14 R v Rheinberger (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 307 R v Seretin [2016] ACTSC 45 R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 R v Sikoulabot [2018] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTSC 330 R v Toumo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; 16 VR 269 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 R v Williams [2015] ACTSC 406 Smith v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 163 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4
Parties:	The Queen (Crown) Jeb Lee Bandy (Offender)
Representation:	Counsel Mr T Hickey (Crown) Mr M Kukulies-Smith (Offender)
Solicitors ACT Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading R v Bandy

Details

AGLC: R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261
Case: [2018] ACTSC 261
Decision Date: 14 September 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Bandy, the defendant faced charges related to recklessly inflicting grievous bodily harm. The matter was heard and determined by the court, which had to assess the appropriate sentence and determine whether an intensive corrections order would be suitable. The defendant's situation was considered to be at a pivotal point, warranting a detailed analysis of the potential benefits of such an order.

The central legal issue before the court was whether an intensive corrections order would be an appropriate and effective means of addressing the defendant's offending behaviour and promoting rehabilitation. The court needed to weigh the potential for rehabilitation against the severity of the offence and the need for punishment and deterrence. Additionally, the court had to consider the specific circumstances of the defendant's life and whether such an order would provide a meaningful opportunity for change.

In delivering its judgment, the court examined the nature of the offence, the defendant's background, and the potential for rehabilitation through an intensive corrections order. The court recognised that the defendant was at a significant juncture in their life, and that such an order could provide a structured environment conducive to change. The court also considered the defendant's prospects of rehabilitation, the seriousness of the offence, and the need for the sentence to reflect the community's expectations regarding appropriate punishment and deterrence. Ultimately, the court determined that an intensive corrections order would be an appropriate sentence, given the potential for rehabilitation and the specific circumstances of the case.

The court made a final order that the defendant be subject to an intensive corrections order, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the judgment. This decision was based on a comprehensive assessment of the defendant's situation and the potential for the order to facilitate meaningful rehabilitation while also serving the interests of justice and the community.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [112].

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Citations

AGLC Citation

R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261

Most Recent Citation

R v Sikounnabouth [2018] ACTSC 296

Cases citing this decision · 31 of 31 shown

Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziebell
[2025] ACTSC 471 Para 1

…associated degree of recklessness, together with the nature of the grievous bodily harm to the victim: DPP v Crutchett [2023] ACTSC 193, R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261; R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 ( Sharma ); R v Myles [2017] ACTSC 194; R v Butters [2019] ACTSC 143. The circumstances of the offending are also relevant…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Higgins (No 3)
[2025] ACTSC 309

…en [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 Petterson v The Queen [2013] NSWCCA 133 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Andy [2022] ACTSC 54 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v BI (No 4) [2017] ACTSC 71 R v BM (Unreported, Supreme Court of the ACT, 29 October 2012, Refshauge J) R v Carb…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Lo
[2025] ACTSC 218

…een [2016] ACTCA 14 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Ngata v The Queen [2020] ACTCA 18 R v Al-Harazi (No 7) [2017] ACTSC 350 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Byrne [2013] ACTSC 246 R v Daniel (No 2) [2021] ACTSC 117 R v Elson [2020] ACTSC 264 R v Gordon [2021] ACTSC 283 R v Henry [2018] ACTSC 34 R v Ke…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Hyatt
[2025] ACTSC 103

…6 Kramer v R; R v Kramer [2023] NSWCCA 152 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Carpenter [2022] ACTSC 6 R v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31; 147 CLR 383 R v Donald [2013] NSWCCA 238 R v Elson [2020] ACTSC 264 R v Gatica [2020] ACTSC…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Hagen
[2024] ACTSC 360

…] ACTCA 18 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v BS-X [2021] ACTSC 160; 16 ACTLR 238 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Byrne [2015] ACTSC 113 R v Carberry; R v Deng; Carberry v The King [2023] ACTCA 32 R v Coleman (1990) 47 A Crim R 306 R v Cuthbert (1967) 86 WN (…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Matas
[2024] ACTSC 234

…CLR 623 R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434; 150 A Crim R 575 R v Ashton (a pseudonym) [2022] ACTCA 45 R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434; 150 A Crim R 575 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v BC (No 4) [2021] ACTSC 119 R v BI (No 4) [2017] ACTSC 71 R v BNS (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 145 R v Bonfield [2021] ACTSC 362 R v Campbell [2017] ACTSC 74…
Harlovich v Sebbens
[2024] ACTSC 153

…ACTSC 26 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Owen Patterson v Wendy Brookman [2021] ACTMC 16 Police v Cadd (1997) 69 SASR 150 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Hernando [2002] NSWCCA 489; 136 A Crim R 451 R v Hopkins [2004] NSWCCA 105 R v Irwin [2019] NSWCCA 133 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49; 77 NSWLR 7 R v La…
DPP v Druett
[2024] ACTSC 56

…CLR 520 Hogan v Hinch [2011] HCA 4; 243 CLR 506 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 ; 228 CLR 357 R v Anquetil [2021] NSWCCA 59; 373 FLR 1 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Carpenter [2022] ACTSC 6 R v Crawford [2022] ACTSC 166 R v Irwin [2019] NSWCCA 133 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 550 R v Seymour [2021] ACTSC 1…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Manns (No 2)
[2023] ACTSC 405

…9 ACTLR 244 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 Power v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 623 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Batcheldor [2021] ACTSC 208 R v BI (No 4) [2017] ACTSC 71 R v Bourne; R v Manns [2018] ACTSC 35 R v BS-X [2021] ACTSC 160; 16 ACTLR 238 R v Campbel…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dritsas
[2023] ACTSC 308

…66 CLR 59 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 O'Brien v The Queen [2015] ACTCA 47 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Barron [2020] ACTSC 281 R v BC [2020] ACTSC 308 R v Carmody [2016] ACTSC 382 R v Hallam [2021] ACTSC 141 R v Kelly (No 2) [2021] ACTSC 253 R v Ke…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Wickes
[2023] ACTSC 296

…NSWLR 552 Marinellis v R [2006] NSWCCA 307 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v BC (No 4) [2021] ACTSC 119 R v BJW [2000] NSWCCA 60; 112 A Crim R 1 R v Butters [2019] ACTSC 143 R v EN [2020] ACTSC 302 R v Gordon [2022] ACTCA…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Paff
[2023] ACTSC 259

…[2014] ACTCA 46; 245 A Crim R 80 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Mun v The Queen [2015] NSWCCA 234 R v AEM [2002] NSWCCA 58 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Butters [2019] ACTSC 143 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Daniel (No 2) [2021] ACTSC 117 R v Elson [2020] ACTSC 264 R v Kilic [2016] HCA 48; 259 C…
Kqe v Director of Public Prosecutions
[2024] ACTCA 7

…R 565 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 KQE v The Queen [2022] ACTCA 18 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Porter v R [2008] NSWCCA 145 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Gray [2019] NSWDC 550 R v KQE [2022] ACTSC 69 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; 16 VR 240 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131;…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Crutchett
[2023] ACTSC 193 Para 1

…e to the conduct of the offender and associated degree of recklessness, together with the nature of the grievous bodily harm to the victim: R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261; R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180; R v Myles [2017] ACTSC 194; R v Butters [2019] ACTSC 143 ( Butters ). The circumstances of the offending are also relev…
R v Smith (No 2)
[2022] ACTSC 246

…610 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 The Queen v Kilic [2016] HCA 48; 259 CLR 256 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Campbell (No 4) [2019] ACTSC 240 R v Elson [2020] ACTSC 264 R v EN [2020] ACTSC 302 R v Evans; R v Reid [2020] ACTSC 169 R v Formosa [2005] NSWCC…
R v Paredes Valdez
[2022] ACTSC 126 Para 1

…the conduct of the offender and the associated degree of recklessness, together with the nature of the grievous bodily harm to the victim: R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261; R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 ( R v Sharma); R v Myles [2017] ACTSC 194 ( R v Myles) ; R v Butters [2019] ACTSC 143. The circumstances of the offendin…
R v Carpenter
[2022] ACTSC 6 Para 1

…e punishment as it is an aggravating factor on sentence; it is not, however, relevant to assessing the objective seriousness of an offence: R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261. The assessment of objective seriousness of an offence is a fundamental step in determining the range of proportionate sentences available for the of…
R v Kinsela
[2021] ACTSC 265 Para 1

…The defence referred to the decision in R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 ( Bandy) in which the offender received a sentence of imprisonment of 30 months to be served by way of intensive corrections order with a community service condition. Bandy and many of the cases referred to therein are of limited assistance in the p…
R v Daniel (No 2)
[2021] ACTSC 117 Para 1

…I note at this juncture as I did in R v Miller [2018] ACTSC 244 at [57] and R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 at [108] that in Veen v The Queen (No 2) at 476, the High Court emphasised that the guideposts that are the purposes of sentencing sometimes point in different directions:…
R v Murphy
[2021] ACTSC 94 Para 1

…ing factor on sentence; it is not, however, correct to submit that it is relevant to assessing the objective seriousness of an offence: see R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 at [27]-[30].…
R v EN
[2020] ACTSC 302 Para 1

…The fact that the offender was on conditional liberty at the time of the offence is an aggravating factor on sentence: R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 at [27]-[30]. I take the conditional liberty into account as an aggravating factor on sentence.…
R v Watson
[2020] ACTSC 21 Para 1

…at 476, the High Court emphasised that the guideposts that are the purposes of sentencing sometimes point in different directions (See also R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261; R v Miller [2018] ACTSC 244):…
R v Negah
[2019] ACTSC 243

…] ACTCA 46; 245 A Crim R 80 Munro v R [2006] NSWCCA 350 Nguyen v The Queen [2016] HCA 17; 256 CLR 656 O’Brien v The Queen [2015] ACTCA 47 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Bui [2014] ACTSC 182 R v Hoang [2016] ACTSC 272 R v Le Pavoux [2017] ACTSC 330 R v Lockwood [2018] ACTSC 288 R v Nguyen (Supreme Court of the Austr…
R v Butters
[2019] ACTSC 143 Para 1

…rst, the culpability of the offender’s conduct, and second, the relative seriousness of the grievous bodily harm sustained by the victim: R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 ( Bandy ); R v Hidic [2017] ACTSC 307 ( Hidic ); R v Myles [2017] ACTSC 194 ( Myles ); R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 ( Sharma ); R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 3…
R v Bailey
[2019] ACTSC 102

…HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 46; 245 A Crim R 80 Pattalis v R [2013] NSWCCA 171 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Cranfield [201…
R v Waghorn
[2019] ACTSC 72

…005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 46; 245 A Crim R 80 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman [2018]…
R v Yuen
[2019] ACTSC 70

…es v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 46; 245 A Crim R 80 R v Ainsworth [2003] QCA 468;1 Qd R 679 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Azar [2004] NSWSC 797 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Cranfield [201…
R v Woods; R v Mathews; R v Mathews
[2019] ACTSC 33 Para 1

…Relevantly, as I stated in R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 at [108], in Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 at 476, the High Court emphasised that the guideposts that are the purposes of sentencing sometimes point in different directions:…
R v Gillett
[2019] ACTSC 30

…20 Hughes v R [2014] NSWCCA 15 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 R v Allan; Ex Parte Commonwealth DPP [2016] QCA 270 QCA 270 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Bartels [2018] SASCFC 34 R v Colakovic (unreported, Sorby J, NSW District Court, 24 April 2014) R v Combo [2015] WASCA 34 R v Gladowski [2000] QC…
R v Merritt
[2019] ACTSC 23

…he Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 46; 245 A Crim R 80 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Cranfield [201…
R v Sikounnabouth
[2018] ACTSC 296

…Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Bandy [2018] ACTSC 261 R v Booth [2016] ACTSC 365 R v Coogan [2017] ACTSC 238 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Lockwood [2018] ACTSC 288 R v Martin [2017] VSCA 291; 20…

View all 31 citing cases →

Cases cited in this decision · 48 of 48 shown

R v Miller
[2018] ACTSC 244 Para 1

…Relevantly, as I stated in R v Miller [2018] ACTSC 244 at [57], in Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 at 476, the High Court emphasised that the guideposts that are the purposes of sentencing sometimes point in different directions:…
R v Sikoulabot
[2018] ACTSC 217

…2012) R v Rheinberger [2016] ACTSC 14 R v Rheinberger (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 307 R v Seretin [2016] ACTSC 45 R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 R v Sikoulabot [2018] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTSC 330 R v Toumo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; 16 VR 269 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA…
R v McNeill
[2018] ACTSC 125

…eported, Nield AJ, 16 September 2010) R v LT [2017] ACTSC 343 R v McBride [2017] ACTSC 102 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR 566 R v McNeill [2018] ACTSC 125 R v Miller [2018] ACTSC 244 R v Myles [2017] ACTSC 194 R v Neish (Unreported, Refshauge J, 24 May 2013) R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R v Os…
R v Chapman
[2018] ACTSC 57

…R v Bartlett (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 51 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Cranfield [2017] ACTSC 171 R v Deng [2017] ACTSC 338 R v Dunn [2017] ACTSC 227 R v EL [2016] ACTSC 241 R v Hidic [2017] ACTSC 307 R v Hill [2016]…
Cranfield v The Queen
[2018] ACTCA 3

…nt, made a threat to kill, and punched the victim. The original sentences imposed were successfully appealed by the offender in Cranfield v The Queen [2018] ACTCA 3 on the basis that an incorrect discount for plea of guilty was applied. The offender was sentenced to an overall sentence of 14 years imprisonment wi…
R v Kepaoa (No 2)
[2018] ACTSC 24

…EL [2016] ACTSC 241 R v Hidic [2017] ACTSC 307 R v Hill [2016] ACTSC 310 R v Hopkins [2004] NSWCCA 105 R v Kepaoa [2017] ACTSC 414 R v Kepaoa (No 2) [2018] ACTSC 24 R v Laipato (Unreported, Nield AJ, 16 September 2010) R v LT [2017] ACTSC 343 R v McBride [2017] ACTSC 102 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR…
Xiao v R
[2018] NSWCCA 4

…004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 R v Williams [2015] ACTSC 406 Smith v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 163 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4…
R v Kepaoa
[2017] ACTSC 414

…C 338 R v Dunn [2017] ACTSC 227 R v EL [2016] ACTSC 241 R v Hidic [2017] ACTSC 307 R v Hill [2016] ACTSC 310 R v Hopkins [2004] NSWCCA 105 R v Kepaoa [2017] ACTSC 414 R v Kepaoa (No 2) [2018] ACTSC 24 R v Laipato (Unreported, Nield AJ, 16 September 2010) R v LT [2017] ACTSC 343 R v McBride [2017] ACTSC 102 R v McNa…
R v LT
[2017] ACTSC 343

…Hopkins [2004] NSWCCA 105 R v Kepaoa [2017] ACTSC 414 R v Kepaoa (No 2) [2018] ACTSC 24 R v Laipato (Unreported, Nield AJ, 16 September 2010) R v LT [2017] ACTSC 343 R v McBride [2017] ACTSC 102 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR 566 R v McNeill [2018] ACTSC 125 R v Miller [2018] ACTSC 244 R v Myles [2017]…
R v Burgess
[2017] ACTSC 249

…] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Bartlett (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 51 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Cranfield [2017] ACTSC 171 R v Deng [2017] ACTSC 338 R v Dunn [2017] ACTSC 227 R v…
R v Dunn
[2017] ACTSC 227

…ess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Cranfield [2017] ACTSC 171 R v Deng [2017] ACTSC 338 R v Dunn [2017] ACTSC 227 R v EL [2016] ACTSC 241 R v Hidic [2017] ACTSC 307 R v Hill [2016] ACTSC 310 R v Hopkins [2004] NSWCCA 105 R v Kepaoa [2017] ACTSC 414 R v Kepaoa (No…
R v Myles
[2017] ACTSC 194

…SC 343 R v McBride [2017] ACTSC 102 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR 566 R v McNeill [2018] ACTSC 125 R v Miller [2018] ACTSC 244 R v Myles [2017] ACTSC 194 R v Neish (Unreported, Refshauge J, 24 May 2013) R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; 5 A Crim R 394 R v Pallier…
R v Cranfield
[2017] ACTSC 171

…TSC 51 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Cranfield [2017] ACTSC 171 R v Deng [2017] ACTSC 338 R v Dunn [2017] ACTSC 227 R v EL [2016] ACTSC 241 R v Hidic [2017] ACTSC 307 R v Hill [2016] ACTSC 310 R v Hopkins [2004] N…
R v Pallier
[2017] ACTSC 112

…R v Neish (Unreported, Refshauge J, 24 May 2013) R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; 5 A Crim R 394 R v Pallier [2017] ACTSC 112 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 550 R v Pumpa [2014] ACTSC 223 R v Rappel [2017] ACTSC 38 R v RC (Unreported, Burns J, 19 October 2012) R v Rheinberg…
R v McBride
[2017] ACTSC 102

…v Kepaoa [2017] ACTSC 414 R v Kepaoa (No 2) [2018] ACTSC 24 R v Laipato (Unreported, Nield AJ, 16 September 2010) R v LT [2017] ACTSC 343 R v McBride [2017] ACTSC 102 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR 566 R v McNeill [2018] ACTSC 125 R v Miller [2018] ACTSC 244 R v Myles [2017] ACTSC 194 R v Neish (Unrepor…
R v Toumo'ua
[2017] ACTCA 9

…2) [2016] ACTSC 307 R v Seretin [2016] ACTSC 45 R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 R v Sikoulabot [2018] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTSC 330 R v Toumo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; 16 VR 269 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 R v Williams [2015] ACTSC 406 Smith v…
R v Bartlett (No 2)
[2017] ACTSC 51

…6 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Bartlett (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 51 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Cranfield [2017]…
R v Carmody (No 3)
[2017] ACTSC 60

…v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Bartlett (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 51 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Cranfield [2017] ACTSC 171 R v Deng [2017] ACTSC 338 R v Dunn [2017] ACTSC 227 R v EL [2016] ACTSC 241 R v Hidic [201…
R v Rappel
[2017] ACTSC 38

…Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; 5 A Crim R 394 R v Pallier [2017] ACTSC 112 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 550 R v Pumpa [2014] ACTSC 223 R v Rappel [2017] ACTSC 38 R v RC (Unreported, Burns J, 19 October 2012) R v Rheinberger [2016] ACTSC 14 R v Rheinberger (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 307 R v Seretin [2016] ACTSC 45 R v…
R v Beniamini (No 2)
[2017] ACTSC 32

…244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Bartlett (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 51 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Cranfield [2017] ACTSC 171 R v Deng [2017] ACTSC 338…
R v Bartlett
[2016] ACTSC 390

…57 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 6 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Bartlett (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 51 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACTSC 249 R v Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman…
R v Smith
[2016] ACTSC 330

…6] ACTSC 14 R v Rheinberger (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 307 R v Seretin [2016] ACTSC 45 R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 R v Sikoulabot [2018] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTSC 330 R v Toumo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; 16 VR 269 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 R v Will…
R v Rheinberger (No 2)
[2016] ACTSC 307

…umpa [2014] ACTSC 223 R v Rappel [2017] ACTSC 38 R v RC (Unreported, Burns J, 19 October 2012) R v Rheinberger [2016] ACTSC 14 R v Rheinberger (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 307 R v Seretin [2016] ACTSC 45 R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 R v Sikoulabot [2018] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTSC 330 R v Toumo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Va…
R v Hill
[2016] ACTSC 310 Para 1

…As stated by Murrell CJ in R v Hill [2016] ACTSC 310 ( Hill ) where a person has very good prospects of rehabilitation, the Court, by supporting those prospects in the sentence imposed , thereby also addresses likely future harm to the community and protection of the community. It was also emphasised in Hill that s…
R v Sharma
[2016] ACTSC 180

…(Unreported, Burns J, 19 October 2012) R v Rheinberger [2016] ACTSC 14 R v Rheinberger (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 307 R v Seretin [2016] ACTSC 45 R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 R v Sikoulabot [2018] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTSC 330 R v Toumo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102;…
R v EL
[2016] ACTSC 241

…Carmody (No 3) [2017] ACTSC 60 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Cranfield [2017] ACTSC 171 R v Deng [2017] ACTSC 338 R v Dunn [2017] ACTSC 227 R v EL [2016] ACTSC 241 R v Hidic [2017] ACTSC 307 R v Hill [2016] ACTSC 310 R v Hopkins [2004] NSWCCA 105 R v Kepaoa [2017] ACTSC 414 R v Kepaoa (No 2) [2018] ACTSC 24 R v…
R v Seretin
[2016] ACTSC 45

…pel [2017] ACTSC 38 R v RC (Unreported, Burns J, 19 October 2012) R v Rheinberger [2016] ACTSC 14 R v Rheinberger (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 307 R v Seretin [2016] ACTSC 45 R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 R v Sikoulabot [2018] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTSC 330 R v Toumo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130…
R v Rehinberger
[2016] ACTSC 14

…v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 550 R v Pumpa [2014] ACTSC 223 R v Rappel [2017] ACTSC 38 R v RC (Unreported, Burns J, 19 October 2012) R v Rheinberger [2016] ACTSC 14 R v Rheinberger (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 307 R v Seretin [2016] ACTSC 45 R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 R v Sikoulabot [2018] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTS…
R v Williams
[2015] ACTSC 406

…umo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; 16 VR 269 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 R v Williams [2015] ACTSC 406 Smith v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 163 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4…
R v Pham
[2015] HCA 39

…shauge J, 24 May 2013) R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; 5 A Crim R 394 R v Pallier [2017] ACTSC 112 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 550 R v Pumpa [2014] ACTSC 223 R v Rappel [2017] ACTSC 38 R v RC (Unreported, Burns J, 19 October 2012) R v Rheinberger [2016] ACTSC 14 R v…
R v Amosa
[2015] ACTSC 34

…R 565 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 6 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Bartlett (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 51 R v Beniamini (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 32 R v Burgess [2017] ACT…
R v Pumpa
[2014] ACTSC 223

…999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; 5 A Crim R 394 R v Pallier [2017] ACTSC 112 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 550 R v Pumpa [2014] ACTSC 223 R v Rappel [2017] ACTSC 38 R v RC (Unreported, Burns J, 19 October 2012) R v Rheinberger [2016] ACTSC 14 R v Rheinberger (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 307 R v…
R v Ang
[2014] ACTCA 17 Para 1

…This calls for a consideration of the principle outlined in R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; 5 A Crim R 394 ( Osenkowski ), discussed in R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 ( Ang ), that the sentencing discretion of judges should not be unduly circumscribed in such circumstances.…
Klobucar v The Queen
[2014] ACTCA 6

…en [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Hillier v DPP [2009] NSWCCA 312; 198 A Crim R 565 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 6 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Bartlett (No 2) […
Muldrock v The Queen
[2011] HCA 39

…r v DPP [2009] NSWCCA 312; 198 A Crim R 565 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 6 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Bartlett (No 2) [2017] ACTSC 51 R v Beniamini (No 2)…
Smith v The Queen
[2011] NSWCCA 163

…yk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; 16 VR 269 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 R v Williams [2015] ACTSC 406 Smith v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 163 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4…
Hili v The Queen
[2010] HCA 45

…Hili v the Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Hillier v DPP [2009] NSWCCA 312; 198 A Crim R 565 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 6 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Ba…
Hillier v Director of Public Prosecutions
[2009] NSWCCA 312

…Hili v the Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Hillier v DPP [2009] NSWCCA 312; 198 A Crim R 565 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 6 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Bartle…
R v Van Rysewyk
[2008] NSWCCA 130

…[2016] ACTSC 45 R v Sharma [2016] ACTSC 180 R v Sikoulabot [2018] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTSC 330 R v Toumo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; 16 VR 269 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 R v Williams [2015] ACTSC 406 Smith v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 163 Veen v…
R v Verdins
[2007] VSCA 102

…016] ACTSC 180 R v Sikoulabot [2018] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTSC 330 R v Toumo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; 16 VR 269 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 R v Williams [2015] ACTSC 406 Smith v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 163 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164…
R v McNaughton
[2006] NSWCCA 242

…paoa (No 2) [2018] ACTSC 24 R v Laipato (Unreported, Nield AJ, 16 September 2010) R v LT [2017] ACTSC 343 R v McBride [2017] ACTSC 102 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR 566 R v McNeill [2018] ACTSC 125 R v Miller [2018] ACTSC 244 R v Myles [2017] ACTSC 194 R v Neish (Unreported, Refshauge J, 24 May 2013) R…
Markarian v The Queen
[2005] HCA 25

…Hili v the Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Hillier v DPP [2009] NSWCCA 312; 198 A Crim R 565 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 6 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACTSC 390 R v Ba…
R v Osenkowski
[2005] SASC 142 Para 1

…This calls for a consideration of the principle outlined in R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; 5 A Crim R 394 ( Osenkowski ), discussed in R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 ( Ang ), that the sentencing discretion of judges should not be unduly circumscribed in such circumstances.…
R v Way
[2004] NSWCCA 131

…] ACTSC 217 R v Smith [2016] ACTSC 330 R v Toumo’ua [2017] ACTCA 9 R v Van Rysewyk [2008] NSWCCA 130 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102; 16 VR 269 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 R v Williams [2015] ACTSC 406 Smith v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 163 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4…
R v Hopkins
[2004] NSWCCA 105 Para 1

…stitute some kind of averaging out between the two. There are circumstances in which one is entitled to be determinative: see for example R v Hopkins [2004] NSWCCA 105.…
R v Olbrich
[1999] HCA 54

…566 R v McNeill [2018] ACTSC 125 R v Miller [2018] ACTSC 244 R v Myles [2017] ACTSC 194 R v Neish (Unreported, Refshauge J, 24 May 2013) R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; 5 A Crim R 394 R v Pallier [2017] ACTSC 112 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 550 R v Pumpa [2014] ACTS…
Veen v The Queen (No 2)
[1988] HCA 14

…Hili v the Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Hillier v DPP [2009] NSWCCA 312; 198 A Crim R 565 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Monfries v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 6 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Amosa [2015] ACTSC 34 R v Ang [2014] ACTCA 17 R v Bartlett [2016] ACT…
R v Hidic
[2017] ACTSC 307

…C 60 R v Chapman [2018] ACTSC 57 R v Cranfield [2017] ACTSC 171 R v Deng [2017] ACTSC 338 R v Dunn [2017] ACTSC 227 R v EL [2016] ACTSC 241 R v Hidic [2017] ACTSC 307 R v Hill [2016] ACTSC 310 R v Hopkins [2004] NSWCCA 105 R v Kepaoa [2017] ACTSC 414 R v Kepaoa (No 2) [2018] ACTSC 24 R v Laipato (Unreported, Nield…

Legislation cited in this decision · 2

Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT)
10, 33, 6, 7 5 mentions
Crimes Act 1900 (ACT)
20 2 mentions (from Para 1)