District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Moore [2023] NSWDC 137 Hearing dates: 14 April 2023 Date of orders: 4 May 2023 Decision date: 04 May 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Lerve DCJ Decision: Sentenced – see [83]-[87]
Catchwords: CRIME – property offences – take and drive vehicle
CRIME – sexual offences – sexual intercourse without consent – circumstances of aggravation – deprivation of liberty
CRIME – criminal responsibility – mental illness – intoxication – causal connection
SENTENCING - relevant factors – plea of guilty – remorse – Bugmy factors – general principles
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act, 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act
Criminal Procedure Act, 1986
Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37
DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1
Park v The Queen [2021] HCA 37
R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575; [2004] NSWCCA 434
R v Barker & Gibson [2006] NSWCCA 20
The Attorney General’s Application Under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, 1999 No. 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146.
Category: Sentence Parties: Rex
Joshua Samuel MOORERepresentation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Ms C Mendes, for the offender
Ms G Knight, for the Director of Public Prosecutions
File Number(s): 2021/311570 Publication restriction: There must be no publication of the name of the victim or anything that might tend to identify her.
remarks on sentence
-
The offender appeared before the Local Court at Wagga Wagga on 6 July 2022 and pleaded guilty to two substantive charges, namely that he:
(H84936442 Sequence 3): On 2 November 2021 at Narrandera in the State of New South Wales without having the consent of KB, the person in lawful possession of a motor vehicle, namely CB[..]BY, took and drove it when KB was in the said vehicle, contrary to s 154C(1)(b) of the Crimes Act, 1900 and further that
(H84936442 Sequence 10): On 2 November 2021 at Narrandera in the State of New South Wales, did have sexual intercourse with KB without her consent and knowing that she was not consenting in circumstances of aggravation, namely deprived KB of her liberty for a period before the commission of the offence, contrary to s 61J of the Crimes Act.
-
The pleas of guilty were adhered to at the sentence hearing at the Wagga Wagga District Court on 14 April 2023 and accordingly the offender is entitled to the full 25% discount for the utilitarian value of the pleas of guilty.
-
The offence contrary to s 154C(1)(b) is commonly or shortly known as “carjacking”. That is the description I will use within these reasons. The maximum penalty for that offence is 10 years imprisonment. Parliament has specified a standard non-parole period of 3 years in respect of that offence. The maximum penalty for the Aggravated Sexual Intercourse…
Continue reading R v Moore
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Moore [2023] NSWDC 137
- Case
- [2023] NSWDC 137
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues for the court to address were the causal connection between Moore's intoxication and his criminal conduct, as well as the appropriate weight to be given to his guilty plea and remorse in the sentencing process. Additionally, the court had to consider the application of Bugmy factors and general sentencing principles, particularly in light of the significant aggravating circumstances of the sexual offence.
The court determined that Moore's intoxication, while a contributing factor, was not sufficient to absolve him of criminal responsibility. The intoxication did not negate the requisite intent for the offences committed. The court also acknowledged Moore's guilty plea and expressed remorse as mitigating factors, but emphasised the gravity of the sexual offence. After weighing all relevant factors, including the Bugmy principles and general sentencing considerations, the court imposed a sentence, the details of which are outlined in the numbered paragraphs [83] to [87] of the judgment.
The court concluded that the sentence imposed was commensurate with the severity of the crimes and the principles of justice, taking into account all mitigating and aggravating factors.
Orders
Orders of the court
Sentenced – see [83]-[87]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.