CHILDRENS COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
R v KRM [2020] QChC 4
PARTIES:
R
v
KRM
(Applicant)
FILE NO/S:
452/19
DIVISION:
Appellate
PROCEEDING:
Application for Sentence Review
ORIGINATING COURT:
Childrens Court of Queensland
DELIVERED ON:
11 March 2020
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
12 February 2020
JUDGE:
Richards P
ORDER:
Appeal allowed.
Sentence of 9 months probation set aside. The child is sentenced to 3 months probation.
Sentence otherwise to remain
CATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – SENTENCING OF JUVENILES – where the applicant child was sentenced to 13 offences – where the applicant child was 14 or 15 at the time of the relevant offending – where the applicant child spent 31 days in pre-sentence detention – where a nine month probation order was imposed – whether time in pre-sentence detention was adequately taken into account – whether sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
COUNSEL:
Mr T Finter for the applicant
Mr J Daniels for the respondent
SOLICITORS:
Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for the respondent
On 4 September 2019, the applicant was sentenced in relation to 13 offences. He was cautioned for an offence of failing to appear in accordance with an undertaking on 19 September 2018, possession of a knife in a public place on 29 November 2018 and driving a motor vehicle without a driver’s licence (never held licence) on 12 January 2019. A nine month probation order was imposed for the remaining offences and convictions were not recorded.
The facts of the offences were as follows:
1. On 28 April 2018, the applicant stole bicycles from the roof rack of a vehicle parked in a shopping centre carpark. They were later found damaged and they were written off for insurance purposes. The complainant was required to pay an excess of $1,200. The bikes were worth $23,000. [Stealing, wilful damage]
2. On 16 June 2018, the applicant was found by police to be in possession of a stolen bicycle. [Possession of tainted property]
3. On 19 September 2018, the applicant failed to appear at court in accordance with this undertaking of bail and said that he had forgotten to attend. [Failure to appear]
4. On 29 November 2018, the applicant threatened a person by holding a Stanley knife near the person’s chest. He then resisted arrest, acted aggressively towards police and caused a public nuisance by yelling at police while he was being transported to the Stockland Police Beat. [Possession of a knife in a public place, obstruct police, commit public nuisance]
5. On 12 January 2019, the applicant received the keys to a Hyundai vehicle and unlawfully used that vehicle both as a passenger and as the driver. He drove it at excessive speed and on the wrong side of the road in a populated area.[Receiving tainted property, unlawful use of a motor vehicle, unlicensed driving, dangerous operation of a motor vehicle]
6. On 29 April 2019, he stole a money tin containing charitable donations. [Stealing]
7.…
- AGLC
- R v KRM [2020] QChC 4
- Case
- [2020] QChC 4
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the sentence imposed on KRM was appropriate in light of the time already spent in pre-sentence detention, and whether the sentence could be considered manifestly excessive. The court had to consider principles of sentencing for juveniles, the nature of the offences, and the necessity of rehabilitation versus punishment.
In its judgment, the court found that the time KRM had already spent in pre-sentence detention was not adequately taken into account in the sentencing process. The court concluded that the sentence of nine months probation was manifestly excessive. The court set aside the original sentence and imposed a sentence of three months probation, while otherwise maintaining the other terms of the original sentence.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeal allowed.
Sentence of 9 months probation set aside. The child is sentenced to 3 months probation.
Sentence otherwise to remain
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.