R v Jones

ANDERSON J Background Personal history of respondent The arguments advanced by the Crown 32—Duty of court to fix or extend non-parole periods 32A—Mandatory minimum non-parole periods and proportionality The seriousness of the offending Consideration of s 32A (ii)    The respondent’s submissions The benchmark considerations The limitations on the use of discretion The application of s 32A in this matter The principles in prosecution appeals against sentence Conclusion DAVID J:               32—Duty of court to fix or extend non-parole periods The Present Case

PEEK J