R v IC

Case [2012] QCA 148


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

R v IC [2012] QCA 148

PARTIES:

R
v
IC
(applicant)

FILE NO/S:

CA No 26 of 2012
DC No 46 of 2011

DIVISION:

Court of Appeal

PROCEEDING:

Sentence Application

ORIGINATING COURT:

Childrens Court at Cairns

DELIVERED ON:

8 June 2012

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

28 May 2012

JUDGES:

Holmes and Fraser JJA, Philippides J
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made

ORDERS:

1.   The applicant have leave to appeal against the sentence imposed on 12 December 2011.

2.   The appeal be allowed and the sentence be set aside.

3.   A sentence of 16 months detention be substituted, the applicant to be released from detention after serving 50 per cent of that sentence.

4.   It is recommended that the applicant attend the Griffith Youth Forensic Service.

5.   It is ordered that no conviction be recorded.

CATCHWORDS:

CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – GROUNDS FOR INTERFERENCE – SENTENCE MANIFESTLY EXCESSIVE OR INADEQUATE – where applicant, a juvenile, pleaded guilty to one count of rape – where applicant was sentenced to two years detention, to be released after serving 50 per cent, with no conviction recorded and a recommendation that the applicant attend the Griffith Youth Forensic Service or other program as directed – whether sentencing judge erred in the exercise of the sentencing discretion – whether sentence manifestly excessive

Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld), s 150, s 227(2)

R v A; ex parte A-G (Qld) [2001] QCA 542, cited
R v DAU; ex parte A-G (Qld) [2009] QCA 244, considered
R v E; ex parte A-G (Qld) (2002) 134 A Crim R 486; [2002] QCA 417, cited
R v JAJ [2003] QCA 554, considered
R v KU & Ors; ex parte A-G (Qld) (No 2) [2011] 2 Qd R 439; [2008] QCA 154, cited
R v PZ; ex parte A-G (Qld)[2005] QCA 459, considered
R v R [1996] QCA 75, cited
R v SBR [2010] QCA 94, cited

COUNSEL:

J P Benjamin for the applicant
B J Merrin for the respondent

SOLICITORS:

Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent

  1. HOLMES JA:  I agree with the reasons of Philippides J and the orders she proposes.

  1. FRASER JA:  I agree with the reasons for judgment of Philippides J and the orders proposed by her Honour.

  1. PHILIPPIDES J: The applicant was sentenced on 12 December 2011 to two years detention on his plea to one count of rape committed on 19 February 2011. Pursuant to s 227(2) Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld) (“Youth Justice Act”) the sentencing judge ordered that the applicant be released from detention after serving 50 per cent of the sentence.  The applicant seeks leave to appeal against the sentence imposed, the grounds of appeal being that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive.

  1. The applicant was born on 15 April 1996…

Continue reading R v IC

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v IC [2012] QCA 148
Case
[2012] QCA 148
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v IC, the applicant, a juvenile, pleaded guilty to one count of rape. The sentencing judge imposed a two-year detention sentence, with a recommendation that the applicant attend the Griffith Youth Forensic Service or another program as directed. The applicant sought leave to appeal against the sentence, arguing that it was manifestly excessive.

The court was required to determine whether the sentencing judge had erred in exercising the sentencing discretion, particularly whether the sentence was manifestly excessive or inadequate. The court considered the nature and circumstances of the offence, the character of the applicant, and the principles of sentencing for young offenders, including the need for rehabilitation and the principle of proportionality.

The court found that the sentencing judge had indeed erred in the exercise of the sentencing discretion. The court considered that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive in light of the principles of sentencing for young offenders and the specific circumstances of the case. The appeal was allowed, the sentence was set aside, and a sentence of 16 months detention was substituted, with the applicant to be released after serving 50 per cent of that sentence. The court recommended that the applicant attend the Griffith Youth Forensic Service and ordered that no conviction be recorded.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The applicant have leave to appeal against the sentence imposed on 12 December 2011.

2. The appeal be allowed and the sentence be set aside.

3. A sentence of 16 months detention be substituted, the applicant to be released from detention after serving 50 per cent of that sentence.

4. It is recommended that the applicant attend the Griffith Youth Forensic Service.

5. It is ordered that no conviction be recorded.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.