R v Green

Case [2021] NSWDC 362


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Green [2021] NSWDC 362
Hearing dates: 25 May 2021
Decision date: 25 May 2021
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Haesler SC DCJ
Decision:

Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 6 years 7 months. Non parole period of 3 years 4 months.

Catchwords:

CRIME- Take/detain in company with intent to get advantage occasion actual bodily harm

SENTENCING - Relevant factors on sentence – late guilty plea – objectively serious detention - assault on victim - offence in company - young immature offender - background of disadvantage - long term drug user - parity with young offenders - bailed to rehabilitation facility - quasi custody - demonstrated progress toward rehabilitation - special circumstances

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Afu v R [2017] NSWCCA 246

Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571;[2013] HCA 37

Green v The Queen (2011) 244CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49

Henry v R [1999] NSWCCA111; (1999) 46 NSWLR 346

Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26

R v Boney [2001] NSWCCA 432R v Lister [2021] NSWDC 132

R v Guinness (a pseudonym) [2021] NSWDC 57

R v Herring (1956) 73 WN (NSW) 203

R v Owen (a pseudonym) [2020] NSWDC 791

R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704

R v Windle [2012] NSWCCA 222

R v Wong [2003] NSWCCA 247

Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267; [2001] HCA 21

Category:Sentence
Parties: Bradley Green (the offender)
Director of Public Prosecutions
Representation: Solicitors:
Ms E Parkes, Solicitor Advocate Legal Aid NSW (for the offender)
Mr L McGonigal (for Director of Public Prosecutions)
File Number(s): 2019/00325410
Publication restriction: Non publication order: I confirm the Non publication order made for the juvenile co-accused Guinness (a pseudonym) and Owen (a pseudonym)

sentence – ex tempore revised

  1. Shortly before the date fixed for his trial Bradley Green asked to be re‑indicted. He pleaded guilty to an offence of detain for advantage while in company and occasioning actual bodily harm on his victim, a young man: s 86(3) Crimes Act 1900. That offence carries a maximum penalty of 25 years imprisonment. That maximum penalty is one important guide to the exercise of my sentencing discretion.

  2. With one exception, there are agreed facts before the Court. Ms Lister had allowed the victim to stay at her rented residence in Lake Illawarra as he was homeless. He and Ms Lister had a number of associates who were either homeless or transient and involved in the heavy use of illicit drug including methylamphetamine. They all lived in a fairly desperate, hand-to-mouth existence. Many had been either on the streets or couch surfing since they were young teenagers. Green was one of that group, although in this matter, the oldest.

  3. Green was aged 24 at the time of the offence but given all the material before me his chronological age was not a measure of his true…

Continue reading R v Green

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Green [2021] NSWDC 362
Case
[2021] NSWDC 362
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Green, the defendant was convicted of taking and detaining another person in company with the intent to obtain advantage by occasioning actual bodily harm. The matter was heard in the High Court of Australia. The defendant, along with others, had detained and assaulted a victim, leading to the criminal charges against him.

The primary legal issues before the court were the determination of an appropriate sentence given the defendant's late guilty plea, the objective seriousness of the detention and assault, the defendant's young age and background of disadvantage, and his status as a long-term drug user. The court also considered the principle of parity with other young offenders and the defendant's demonstrated progress towards rehabilitation while on bail at a rehabilitation facility.

The High Court emphasised the need to balance the gravity of the offence with the defendant's personal circumstances. The court found the offence to be objectively serious due to the actual bodily harm inflicted on the victim and the fact that it was committed in company. However, it also acknowledged the defendant's youth, background of disadvantage, and his efforts towards rehabilitation, which were mitigating factors. The court ultimately determined a sentence of 6 years and 7 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 3 years and 4 months, reflecting these considerations.

The court's final orders included a sentence of imprisonment for 6 years and 7 months, with a non-parole period of 3 years and 4 months. This decision balanced the seriousness of the crime with the defendant's personal circumstances and his progress towards rehabilitation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 6 years 7 months. Non parole period of 3 years 4 months.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.