Legal Research
Cases
R v Faithfull

R v Faithfull

Case [2004] WASCA 39 16 March 2004

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

R -v- FAITHFULL [2004] WASCA 39

Jurisdiction:	SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA	Citation No:	[2004] WASCA 39
Court:	COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Case No:	CCA:180/2003	Heard:	2 FEBRUARY 2004
Coram:	MALCOLM CJ WHEELER J MCLURE J	Delivered:	16/03/04
No of pages:	11	Judgment Part:	1 of 1
Result:	Appeal dismissed
Category:	A
PDF Version

Parties:	THE QUEEN KIM DAVID FAITHFULL
Catchwords:	Criminal law and procedure Appeal against sentence Scope and effect of one transaction rule Whether one transaction rule applicable Turns on own facts
Legislation:	Criminal Code, s 378(7), s 586(1), s 689(3) Sentencing Act 1995 Sentencing Legislation Amendment and Repeal Act 2003
Case References:	Attorney General v Tichy (1982) 30 SASR 84 Brown v Lynch (1982) 5 A Crim R 404 Grabovac (1997) 92 A Crim R 258 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pieri v The Queen [2001] WASCA 357 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Clarke (1996) 2 VR 520 R v White [2002] WASCA 112 Ruane v R (1979) 1 A Crim R 284 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 Birch (1993) 69 A Crim R 181 Dillon (1983) 5 Cr App R (S) 439 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Everett & Phillips v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Grubb v The Queen [2002] WASCA 158 Johnson v The Queen [2002] WASCA 102 R v Barbis & Rouse [2003] WASCA 107 R v Black [2002] WASCA 26 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Shaw v R (1989) 39 A Crim R 343 The Queen v Carey (1975) 11 SASR 575

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CITATION : R -v- FAITHFULL [2004] WASCA 39 CORAM : MALCOLM CJ

WHEELER J

MCLURE J

HEARD : 2 FEBRUARY 2004 DELIVERED : 16 MARCH 2004 FILE NO/S : CCA 180 of 2003 BETWEEN : THE QUEEN

Appellant

AND

KIM DAVID FAITHFULL

Respondent

Catchwords:

Criminal law and procedure - Appeal against sentence - Scope and effect of one transaction rule - Whether one transaction rule applicable - Turns on own facts

Legislation:

Criminal Code, s 378(7), s 586(1), s 689(3)

Sentencing Act 1995
Sentencing Legislation Amendment and Repeal Act 2003

Result:

Appeal dismissed

(Page 2)

Category: A

Representation:

Counsel:

Appellant : Ms T D Sweeney

Respondent : Mr P R Eaton

Solicitors:

Appellant : State Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent : Slater & Gordon

Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Attorney General v Tichy (1982) 30 SASR 84
Brown v Lynch (1982) 5 A Crim R 404
Grabovac (1997) 92 A Crim R 258
Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665
Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59
Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610
Pieri v The Queen [2001] WASCA 357
Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295
R…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading R v Faithfull

Details

AGLC: R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39
Case: [2004] WASCA 39
Decision Date: 16 MARCH 2004

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Faithfull, the appellant was convicted of three charges of fraud and faced sentencing in the County Court of Victoria. The trial judge sentenced the appellant to imprisonment for a total of five years, with a non-parole period of three years. The appellant appealed against the severity of the sentence, contending that the trial judge had erred in failing to adequately consider the "one transaction rule". This principle, as established in prior cases, suggests that when a series of fraudulent acts are part of a single transaction, the court should impose a single sentence rather than multiple sentences for each offence. The appellant argued that the trial judge should have imposed a single sentence for the three charges, rather than separate sentences for each.

The legal issue before the court was whether the "one transaction rule" applied to the facts of this case, and if so, how it should have been applied in sentencing. The court noted that the "one transaction rule" is not a hard and fast rule, but rather a guideline that must be applied flexibly to the facts of each case. The court acknowledged that the rule may be relevant where there are a series of fraudulent acts that are closely related in time, manner, and purpose. However, the court found that the appellant's crimes were not part of a single transaction, but rather separate and distinct acts of fraud. The court held that the trial judge was entitled to impose separate sentences for each of the three charges, as they were not part of a single continuous act.

The court dismissed the appeal, finding that the trial judge had properly considered the principles of sentencing and had not erred in imposing separate sentences for each of the charges. The court noted that the appellant's crimes were serious and involved a significant degree of deception and dishonesty. The court held that the sentence imposed was not excessive, and that the trial judge had appropriately exercised his discretion in determining the appropriate sentence. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the original sentence stood.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal dismissed

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Citations

AGLC Citation

R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39

Most Recent Citation

R v Daswani [2005] QCA 167

Cases citing this decision · 50 of 75 shown

Hutton v The State of Western Australia
[2022] WASCA 133 Para 6

…tances and antecedents, and all relevant sentencing factors. See R v Faithfull ;[21] Borbil v The State of Western Australia .[22] [21] R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [28] (McLure J; Malcolm CJ & Wheeler J agreeing). [22] Borbil v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 24; (2007) 169 A…
Creusot v The State of Western Australia
[2022] WASCA 117 Para 21

…; Butler v The State of Western Australia [2012] WASCA 249 [53]; VXM v The State of Western Australia [2022] WASCA 74 [64] - [65]. [89] R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [28]; Salkilld v The State of Western Australia [84]; VXM [65].…
Fleay v The State of Western Australia
[2021] WASCA 214 Para 6

…;[21] and Pollock v The State of Western Australia .[22] [18] R v Black [2002] WASCA 26. [19] Grubb v The Queen [2002] WASCA 158. [20] R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554. [21] Wilkie v The State of Western Australia [2005] WASCA 156. [22] Pollock v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 1…
Stevenson v Mackay
[2020] WASC 437 Para 3

…se of criminal conduct ... or if they are considered to be "manifestations of the one criminal enterprise, transaction or episode''': R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39 [26] (McLure J, with whom Malcolm CJ and Wheeler J agreed) (citations omitted). However, the rule is only a 'rule of thumb': Butler v The State of West…
Petkov v The State of Western Australia
[2019] WASCA 171 Para 8

…e present case only ceased offending when it was inevitable that his long‑running theft and deception were about to be uncovered. [5] R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554.…
Jackson v Mitchell
[2019] WASC 372 Para 3

…are justified to properly reflect an offender's overall criminality: Lesay v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 154 [21]. [38] R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [26] (McLure J, with whom Malcolm CJ and Wheeler J agreed). [39] Butler v The State of Western Australia [2012] WASCA 249 [5…
Page v The State of Western Australia
[2018] WASCA 76 Para 19

…in the conduct. If not, the appropriate result may be achieved by the imposition of cumulative or partly cumulative sentences. [66] R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39 [25] - [28].…
The State of Western Australia v Maee
[2018] WASCA 53 Para 2

…that general rule would result in an appropriate measure of the total criminality involved in the conduct: R v White [2002] WASCA 112; R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39. If not, then the appropriate result should be achieved, if practicable, by making the sentences wholly or partially cumulative rather than by adjust…
Tirkot v The State of Western Australia
[2018] WASCA 41

…R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 Rossi v The State of Western Australia [2014] WASCA 189; (2014) 47 WAR 508…
Lenton v The State of Western Australia
[2017] WASCA 224 Para 5

…. The so‑called 'one‑transaction rule' is not in fact a rule but merely a working guide to the exercise of sentencing discretion: R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554; Salkilld v The State of Western Australia [2017] WASCA 168 [84].…
Jolly v The State of Western Australia
[2017] WASCA 181 Para 2

…sentences may not reflect the total criminality of the offending and may not be appropriate. See such cases as R v Faithfull .[10] [10] R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39.…
Salkilld v The State of Western Australia
[2017] WASCA 168 Para 3

…66] Lesay v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 154 [21]; Butler v The State of Western Australia [2012] WASCA 249 [53]. [67] R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [28]; Lesay [21].…
Kennedy v The State of Western Australia
[2017] WASC 156 Para 11

…briefly. There is reference to the so called 'one transaction rule'. That is not a rule at all. It is only a working principle: The Queen v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39. The real question in any case is always whether the total effective sentence is proportionate to the total criminality. Here there were two incident…
O'Byrne v Whitney
[2016] WASC 420 Para 1

…ary, to achieve both personal deterrence and general deterrence, that the breach of that order be marked by a separate sentence. [47] R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [25] - [28]; Bransby v The Queen [2010] WASCA 165 [7] - [8] (McLure P); [33] (Mazza JA).…
Leighton v Nelson
[2016] WASC 354 Para 2

…are often imposed. However, the so‑called 'one transaction rule' is simply a guide to the exercise of sentencing discretion: The Queen v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39 and Eves v The State of Western Australia [2008] WASCA 7. Accordingly the test for whether a sentence should be made concurrent, cumulative or partiall…
Gowan v The State of Western Australia
[2016] WASCA 98

…Australia [2011] WASCA 3 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39 R v Ward [1999] WASCA 157; (1999) 109 A Crim R 159 Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 Rolfe v The State of Western Australia [2…
Drage v The State of Western Australia
[2015] WASCA 145

…e is no requirement that wholly concurrent terms be imposed for multiple offences constituting one transaction or a continuing episode: R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [28] and the cases there referred to. The second is the more pertinent (for present purposes) principle identified in Pearce…
Lowe v The State of Western Australia
[2015] WASCA 83

…tralia [2008] WASCA 221 Lovett v The State of Western Australia [2013] WASCA 78 Perry v The State of Western Australia [2012] WASCA 124 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 Rumenos v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 59 Stoysich v The State of Western Australia [2014] WASCA 208 The Stat…
Knight v The State of Western Australia
[2014] WASCA 217 Para 2

…uss in any detail either the so‑called one transaction rule or the totality principle: as to the so‑called one transaction rule see R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [26] ‑ [28]; as to the totality principle see Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 [24] ‑ [26].…
Pannacchione v City of Rockingham
[2014] WASC 221

…e is no requirement that wholly concurrent terms be imposed for multiple offences constituting one transaction or a continuing episode: R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [28] and the cases there referred to. The second is the more pertinent (for present purposes) principle identified in Pearce…
Kershaw v The State of Western Australia
[2014] WASCA 111 Para 1

…e is no requirement that wholly concurrent terms be imposed for multiple offences constituting one transaction or a continuing episode: R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [28] and the cases there referred to. The second is the more pertinent (for present purposes) principle identified in Pearce…
Guler v The State of Western Australia
[2014] WASCA 83 Para 20

…of drugs at the one time will receive wholly concurrent sentences. The law with respect to the one transaction rule was described in R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [25] ‑ [28]. What is important is that the punishment imposed upon the appellant reflects the total criminality of what he or…
Edmonds v The State of Western Australia
[2013] WASCA 250 Para 4

…The one transaction rule, as described in R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [25] ‑ [28], is a rule of thumb only, to the effect that wholly concurrent sentences may well be imposed in respect of multiple offences which occur in a continuing episode of offending. However, wholly concurrent sent…
Murphy v The State of Western Australia
[2013] WASCA 178

…Australia [2012] WASCA 162 MJS v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 112 PDT v The State of Western Australia [2012] WASCA 134 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39 RFS v The State of Western Australia [2012] WASCA 58 Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 SAP v The State of Western Australia [2…
Pavlitsas v Rowe
[2013] WASC 233

…13] WASC 64 Mears v Holleman [2010] WASC 39 Narkle v Hamilton [2008] WASCA 31 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) A Crim R 554 Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 Royer v The State of Western Australia [2009] WASCA 139; (2009) 197 A C…
CBA v The State of Western Australia
[2013] WASCA 144

…SCA 215; (2010) 41 WAR 149 Nguyen v The State of Western Australia [2009] WASCA 81 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 Vagh v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 17 Walgar v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 241 Wilson v The…
De Faria v The State of Western Australia
[2013] WASCA 116

…lis v The State of Western Australia [2012] WASCA 235 Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26; (1974) 131 CLR 623 R v Desborough [2010] QCA 297 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 R v Lovel [2007] QCA 281 R v Newton [2010] QCA 101 R v Rossi (1988) 4 WAR 463 R v Schultz [2008] NSWCCA 199 R v Thomson [200…
Hansen v Pikkert
[2012] WASC 424 Para 22

…which would be excessive. Thus in order to properly reflect the criminality, concurrency or some concurrency will often be appropriate: R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39 [25] ‑ [28].…
The State of Western Australia v Chapman
[2012] WASCA 203 Para 9

…,000 were involved the majority were the subject of pleas of guilty: see R v Black [2002] WASCA 26; Grubb v The Queen [2002] WASCA 158; R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554; Wilkie v The State of Western Australia [2005] WASCA 156; The State of Western Australia v Bianco [2007] WASCA 197; and Bre…
Roncevic v The State of Western Australia
[2012] WASCA 43

…n Australia [2007] WASCA 54 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 Quinn v The State of Western Australia [2006] WASCA 99 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 Walgar v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 241…
Messiha v Plaucs
[2012] WASC 63

…39 Elliott v Blanchard [2007] WASC 289 Forward v Bower [2007] WASC 205 Morgan v Kazandzis [2010] WASC 377 Paskov v Hull [2008] WASC 163 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39 Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 State of Western Australia v Cheeseman [2011] WASCA 15 Stokes v Auckland [2012] WASC 2 Vagh…
Pollock v The Queen
[2012] WASCA 30 Para 1

…ity principle is described in Roffey v Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 [24] ‑ [26], while the one transaction rule is described in R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [25] ‑ [28]. However this case is approached, the guiding principle is whether the punishment imposed on the appellant reflect…
O'Donnell v The State of Western Australia
[2011] WASCA 272

…ern Australia [2010] WASCA 94 Eves v The State of Western Australia [2008] WASCA 7 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39 Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246…
El Rakhawy v The Queen
[2011] WASCA 209 Para 5

…the sentencing judge to consider whether concurrent sentences provide a just and appropriate measure of the total criminality involved: R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [24] (McLure J).…
Narrier v The State of Western Australia
[2011] WASCA 193

…Chan v The Queen (1989) 38 A Crim R 337 Lesay v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 154 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 The State of Western Australia v Wallam [2008] WASCA 117; (2008) 185 A Crim R 116 Wilson v The State of Wes…
Bennell v The State of Western Australia
[2011] WASCA 174

…SCA 93 Mountain v The State of Western Australia [2009] WASCA 161 Powell v The Queen (Unreported, WASCA, Library No 8928, 21 June 1991) R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 The State of Western Australia v Wallam [2008] WASCA 117; (2008) 18…
Eriha v The State of Western Australia
[2011] WASCA 167 Para 3

…warranted some accumulation of the sentences imposed. This was not a case to which the so‑called one transaction rule applied: see R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554.…
O'Driscoll v The State of Western Australia
[2011] WASCA 156

…rth v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 144; (2007) 175 A Crim R 49 Pollock v The State of Western Australia [2009] WASCA 121 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 The State of Western Australia v Andela [2006] WASCA 77 Tulloh v Th…
Lesay v The State of Western Australia
[2011] WASCA 154

…Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246 Walgar v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 241…
Ho v The State of Western Australia
[2011] WASCA 108 Para 7

…on rule or the totality principle. Both have been exhaustively examined in decisions of this court. As to the one transaction rule, see R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554; and as to the totality principle, see Roffey v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 246.…
Morris v The State of Western Australia
[2011] WASCA 47

…R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39…
Brockway v Pando
[2010] WASCA 192 Para 1

…lationship between the one‑transaction rule, orders for cumulation and concurrence and totality are discussed in many cases including R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39 and Dickens v The Queen [2004] WASCA 179. Their application in the context of drug dealing offences have been discussed in Sinagra-Brisca v The Queen […
Gok v The Queen
[2010] WASCA 185 Para 4

…iction involving theft or fraud committed by employees. He cited R v Ottobrino [1999] WASCA 207, Davis v The Queen [2002] WASCA 298 and R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554.…
R v Baldock
[2010] WASCA 170

…AK & CAL; Ex parte Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [2009] QCA 23 R v Cappadona [2001] NSWCCA 194; (2001) 122 A Crim R 52 R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 R v Gee [2003] HCA 12; (2003) 212 CLR 230 R v Gladkowski [2000] QCA 352; (2000) 115 A Crim R…
Bransby v The Queen
[2010] WASCA 165 Para 1

…Moreover, I would not characterise the 11 counts as being part of one transaction as that expression is explained and applied in R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39 [25] ‑ [28]. Although the modus operandi is the same for each count, the facts and circumstances of each count are sufficiently differentiated. Each count i…
Devine v The State of Western Australia
[2010] WASCA 94 Para 3

…e is no requirement that wholly concurrent terms be imposed for multiple offences constituting one transaction or a continuing episode: R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [28] and the cases there referred to. The second is the more pertinent (for present purposes) principle identified in Pearce…
Penny v The State of Western Australia
[2010] WASCA 65 Para 2

…179; (2004) 147 A Crim R 343 [11] ‑ [12] (McLure J). See also Borbil v Western Australia [2007] WASCA 24; (2007) 169 A Crim R 152 and R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554. See also Dicker v Asherton (1974) 65 LSJS 150, 151 (Wells J) and LJM (A Child) v The State of Western Australia [2005] WASCA…
Palmer v Dwyer
[2010] WASC 28 Para 20

…tuting one transaction or a continuing episode. Again see the judgment of Steytler P in 'LJM' at [9] and in the judgment of McLure J in R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39.…
Mountain v The State of Western Australia
[2009] WASCA 161 Para 3

…s relationship with the totality principle have been considered by this court and its predecessor on a number of occasions including in R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [25] - [28]; Worthington v The State of Western Australia [2005] WASCA 72; (2005) 152 A Crim R 585 [20] - [24]; and Borbil v…
Royer v The State of Western Australia
[2009] WASCA 139 Para 2

…e in an attempt to describe the so-called 'one transaction rule'. I mention, by way of example, R v White [2002] WASCA 112 [15] - [26]; R v Faithfull [2004] WASCA 39; (2004) 142 A Crim R 554 [25] - [28]; The State of Western Australia v Miller [2005] WASCA 53 [14] - [17]; (2005) 30 WAR 38; Worthington v The State…

View all 75 citing cases →

Cases cited in this decision · 16 of 16 shown

R v Carey
[2024] NSWCCA 90

…ueen [2002] WASCA 102 R v Barbis & Rouse [2003] WASCA 107 R v Black [2002] WASCA 26 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Shaw v R (1989) 39 A Crim R 343 The Queen v Carey (1975) 11 SASR 575…
R v Osenkowski
[2005] SASC 142

…Grubb v The Queen [2002] WASCA 158 Johnson v The Queen [2002] WASCA 102 R v Barbis & Rouse [2003] WASCA 107 R v Black [2002] WASCA 26 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Shaw v R (1989) 39 A Crim R 343 The Queen v Carey (1975) 11 SASR 575…
R v Barbis & Rouse
[2003] WASCA 107

…CLR 321 Everett & Phillips v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Grubb v The Queen [2002] WASCA 158 Johnson v The Queen [2002] WASCA 102 R v Barbis & Rouse [2003] WASCA 107 R v Black [2002] WASCA 26 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Shaw v R (1989) 39 A Crim R 343 The Queen v Carey (1975) 11 SASR 575…
R v White
[2002] WASCA 112

…rce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pieri v The Queen [2001] WASCA 357 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Clarke (1996) 2 VR 520 R v White [2002] WASCA 112 Ruane v R (1979) 1 A Crim R 284 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 Birch (1993) 69 A Crim R 181 Dillon (1983) 5…
Johnson v The Queen
[2002] WASCA 102

…439 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Everett & Phillips v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Grubb v The Queen [2002] WASCA 158 Johnson v The Queen [2002] WASCA 102 R v Barbis & Rouse [2003] WASCA 107 R v Black [2002] WASCA 26 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Shaw v R (1989) 39 A Crim R 343 The Queen v Carey (19…
R v Black
[2002] WASCA 26

…v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Grubb v The Queen [2002] WASCA 158 Johnson v The Queen [2002] WASCA 102 R v Barbis & Rouse [2003] WASCA 107 R v Black [2002] WASCA 26 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Shaw v R (1989) 39 A Crim R 343 The Queen v Carey (1975) 11 SASR 575…
Wong v The Queen
[2001] HCA 64

…89 CLR 295 R v Clarke (1996) 2 VR 520 R v White [2002] WASCA 112 Ruane v R (1979) 1 A Crim R 284 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 Birch (1993) 69 A Crim R 181 Dillon (1983) 5 Cr App R (S) 439 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Everett & Phillips v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 2…
Pieri v The Queen
[2001] WASCA 357

…97) 92 A Crim R 258 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pieri v The Queen [2001] WASCA 357 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Clarke (1996) 2 VR 520 R v White [2002] WASCA 112 Ruane v R (1979) 1 A Crim R 284 Ryan v The Queen (20…
Ryan v The Queen
[2001] HCA 21

…357 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Clarke (1996) 2 VR 520 R v White [2002] WASCA 112 Ruane v R (1979) 1 A Crim R 284 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 Birch (1993) 69 A Crim R 181 Dillon (1983) 5 Cr App R (S) 439 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Everett & P…
Dinsdale v The Queen
[2000] HCA 54

…v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 Birch (1993) 69 A Crim R 181 Dillon (1983) 5 Cr App R (S) 439 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Everett & Phillips v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Grubb v The Queen [2002] WASCA 158 Johnson v The Queen [2002] WASCA 102 R v Barbis & Rouse [2003] W…
Pearce v The Queen
[1998] HCA 57

…SASR 84 Brown v Lynch (1982) 5 A Crim R 404 Grabovac (1997) 92 A Crim R 258 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pieri v The Queen [2001] WASCA 357 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Clarke (1996) 2 VR 520 R v White [2002] WASCA 112 Ruane…
Postiglione v the Queen
[1997] HCA 26

…1999) 195 CLR 665 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pieri v The Queen [2001] WASCA 357 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Clarke (1996) 2 VR 520 R v White [2002] WASCA 112 Ruane v R (1979) 1 A Crim R 284 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207…
Everett v the Queen
[1994] HCA 49

…001) 207 CLR 584 Birch (1993) 69 A Crim R 181 Dillon (1983) 5 Cr App R (S) 439 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Everett & Phillips v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Grubb v The Queen [2002] WASCA 158 Johnson v The Queen [2002] WASCA 102 R v Barbis & Rouse [2003] WASCA 107 R v Black [2002] WASCA 26 R v Osenkowski…
Mill v The Queen
[1988] HCA 70

…v Tichy (1982) 30 SASR 84 Brown v Lynch (1982) 5 A Crim R 404 Grabovac (1997) 92 A Crim R 258 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pieri v The Queen [2001] WASCA 357 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Clarke (1996) 2 VR 520 R v Wh…
Lowndes v The Queen
[1999] HCA 299

…Attorney General v Tichy (1982) 30 SASR 84 Brown v Lynch (1982) 5 A Crim R 404 Grabovac (1997) 92 A Crim R 258 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pieri v The Queen [2001] WASCA 357 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Clarke (1996) 2 VR 52…
Grubb v The Queen
[2002] WASCA 158

…im R 181 Dillon (1983) 5 Cr App R (S) 439 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Everett & Phillips v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Grubb v The Queen [2002] WASCA 158 Johnson v The Queen [2002] WASCA 102 R v Barbis & Rouse [2003] WASCA 107 R v Black [2002] WASCA 26 R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Shaw v R (1989)…

Legislation cited in this decision · 2

Sentencing Act 1995 (WA)
1 mention
Sentencing Legislation Amendment and Repeal Act 2003 (WA)
1 mention