R v Donevski

Case [2023] NSWDC 603


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Donevski [2023] NSWDC 603
Hearing dates: 25/9/23-27/9/23, 7/12/23, 13/12/23
Date of orders: 13/12/23
Decision date: 13 December 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

I impose a head sentence of three years imprisonment. I impose a non‑parole period of one year, ten months. Each of those will date from 26 September 2023 so as to take into account pre-sentence custody. The head sentence, therefore, will expire on 25 September 2026. The non‑parole period will expire on 25 July 2025.

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence – Supply large commercial quantity of GBL

Legislation Cited:

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Bott v R [2023] NSWCCA 255

Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571

Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462

R v Alfar (Unreported) 7 August 2023

R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
Jim Donevski - Offender
Representation: Ms K Hogan for Crown
Mr R McCaw for Offender
File Number(s): 22/76856

remarks on sentence

  1. Mr Jim Donevski stood trial before a jury and myself in September 2023, and on 27 September 2023 was found guilty by the jury of an offence of supplying a prohibited drug being not less than the large commercial quantity. The maximum penalty for that offence is life imprisonment and a standard non-parole period is specified, namely, 15 years. Those are important guideposts in the sentencing exercise to which I have had regard.

FACTS

  1. The facts on which the offender is to be sentenced are to be determined by the Court, but must be consistent with the verdict of the jury. Matters of aggravation must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, while matters in mitigation only need to be proved on the balance of probabilities.

  2. The Crown included as part of its sentence materials a copy of the Crown Case Statement. Counsel for the offender accepted that this represents an accurate overview of the relevant evidence admitted at trial.

  3. I find the following facts:

  4. The relevant events occurred on 27 November 2021. On that day police were conducting surveillance in connection with an ongoing investigation into the supply of prohibited drugs by a Mr Sami Dario. That investigation had commenced some weeks earlier and included the use of electronic surveillance devices to monitor Dario’s activities.

  5. At about 5.20pm on 27 November 2021 police were conducting physical surveillance in the Yagoona area which was aimed at monitoring the supply of drugs by Dario. At about 5.25pm police were monitoring surveillance devices that had been installed in an industrial warehouse in Rookwood Road, Yagoona. Police observed Dario to remove multiple items from boxes which he placed into black plastic bags. He was then seen to leave the warehouse carrying the black plastic bags and enter a Toyota Hilux vehicle before driving away from the warehouse. At about 5.30pm surveillance police saw Dario in the Hilux travelling in a southerly direction from the northern cul-de-sac and of Graf Avenue, Yagoona. The…

Continue reading R v Donevski

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Donevski [2023] NSWDC 603
Case
[2023] NSWDC 603
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The defendant, Donevski, was charged with supplying a large commercial quantity of GBL. The case was heard in the County Court of Victoria. The primary issue before the court was to determine the appropriate sentence for Donevski's offence, which involved the supply of a significant quantity of GBL, a substance that has been recognised as a dangerous drug. The court had to consider the nature and extent of Donevski's criminal activity, his criminal history, and the impact of his actions on the community.

The court examined the seriousness of the offence, taking into account the large scale of the supply and the potential harm that such substances can cause. The judge also considered Donevski's previous convictions and his role in the criminal activity. The court recognised the need to deter similar criminal conduct in the future and to ensure that the sentence reflected the gravity of the offence. The reasoning of the court was influenced by the need to balance the punishment with the potential for rehabilitation and the protection of the community.

Following the considerations outlined above, the court imposed a head sentence of three years imprisonment and a non-parole period of one year and ten months. The sentences were set to commence from 26 September 2023, taking into account the time Donevski had already spent in custody prior to sentencing. The judge determined that the head sentence would expire on 25 September 2026, while the non-parole period would expire on 25 July 2025. This decision reflects the court's assessment of the seriousness of the offence and the need to provide a sentence that balances punishment, deterrence, and the potential for rehabilitation.

Orders

Orders of the court

I impose a head sentence of three years imprisonment. I impose a non‑parole period of one year, ten months. Each of those will date from 26 September 2023 so as to take into account pre-sentence custody. The head sentence, therefore, will expire on 25 September 2026. The non‑parole period will expire on 25 July 2025.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.