R v Cornelissen; R v Sutton

JAMES J JAMES J CROWN CASE AT THE TRIAL THE DEFENCE CASE OF THE APPELLANT CORNELISSEN AT THE TRIAL THE DEFENCE CASE OF THE APPELLANT SUTTON AT THE TRIAL GROUNDS OF APPEAL The trial judge erred in failing to direct the jury not to engage in tendency reasoning with respect to relationship evidence admitted in the prosecution case 1.          The trial judge erred by permitting the jury to consider the evidence of Tanya Byrne in the case against the appellant Ground 2 (Cornelissen) Wilson v The Queen Wilson Ground 3 (Cornelissen) R v Stewart Ground 3 (Sutton) R v Stokes and Difford Stokes and Difford Ground 4 (Cornelissen) M v The Queen Wilson CONCLUSION HIDDEN J BELL J