FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PVYW v Comcare Australia [2011] FCA 535
Citation: PVYW v Comcare Australia [2011] FCA 535 Appeal from: Appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Parties: PVYW v COMCARE AUSTRALIA File number: NSD 1761 of 2010 Judge: NICHOLAS J Date of judgment: 20 May 2011 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for suppression of applicant’s name – s 50 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – consideration of principle of open justice – whether suppression necessary to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice – applicant suffering psychological injuries –applicant will not continue proceeding if name not suppressed –proceeding involves matters of statutory interpretation based upon agreed facts – application not motivated by simple desire to avoid embarrassment or ridicule – order made to suppress applicant’s name Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 50(1)
Administrative Appeals Act 1975 (Cth) s 35(2)Cases cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2007) 73 NSWLR 635
Australian Broadcasting Commission v Parish (1980) 29 ALR 228
Commission of Taxation v H (2010) 268 ALR 101
Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577
Dye v Commonwealth Securities Ltd(No 2) [2010] FCAFC 118
Hogan v Australian Crime Commission& Ors (2010) 240 CLR 651
X v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (2007) 226 CLR 630Date of hearing: 17 May 2011 Place: Sydney Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 24 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr LT Grey Solicitor for the Applicant: Pappas, J. – Attorney Solicitor for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 1761 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: PVYW
ApplicantAND: COMCARE AUSTRALIA
Respondent
JUDGE:
NICHOLAS J
DATE OF ORDER:
20 MAY 2011
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to Section 50 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 and subject to any further order or direction of the Court:
(a)publication of the true name and address of the applicant, as described in confidential exhibit EX1 to the Affidavit of Nigel John Gabbedy affirmed 9 February 2011, be forbidden;
(b)this proceeding continue on the basis that the applicant be identified by the pseudonym “PVYW” in all documents filed in relation to the appeal, or generated by the Court Registry, and in the Reasons for Decision ultimately given by the Court.
2.There be no order as to the costs of the applicant’s notice of motion.
3.The proceeding is to stand over to a date to be fixed by arrangement with the associate to Nicholas J.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 1761 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: PVYW
ApplicantAND: COMCARE…
Continue reading PVYW v Comcare Australia
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- PVYW v Comcare Australia [2011] FCA 535
- Case
- [2011] FCA 535
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to consider the principle of open justice and whether there were exceptional circumstances that warranted suppressing the applicant’s name. The applicant argued that the suppression was not motivated by a desire to avoid embarrassment or ridicule but was essential to prevent them from discontinuing the case. The court also noted that the proceeding involved statutory interpretation based on agreed facts, which would not be prejudiced by the use of a pseudonym.
The court found that the applicant’s psychological condition was a significant factor that warranted the suppression of their identity. The court recognised that discontinuing the litigation would be detrimental, and the use of a pseudonym would not prejudice the administration of justice. Consequently, the court made an order to suppress the applicant’s name, allowing the proceedings to continue under the pseudonym "PVYW." The court also decided not to order any costs for the applicant’s notice of motion and directed that the matter be stood over until a date was arranged with the associate to Nicholas J.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to Section 50 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 and subject to any further order or direction of the Court:
(a) publication of the true name and address of the applicant, as described in confidential exhibit EX1 to the Affidavit of Nigel John Gabbedy affirmed 9 February 2011, be forbidden;
(b) this proceeding continue on the basis that the applicant be identified by the pseudonym “PVYW” in all documents filed in relation to the appeal, or generated by the Court Registry, and in the Reasons for Decision ultimately given by the Court.
2. There be no order as to the costs of the applicant’s notice of motion.
3. The proceeding is to stand over to a date to be fixed by arrangement with the associate to Nicholas J.
Note:
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.