FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Prior v Sheldon [2000] FCA 438COPYRIGHT – Authorship of musical works – Musical theme for television series and “stings” for exits and entrances to program – Conflict of evidence as to authorship of both works – Effect of agreement to submit dispute as to authorship to determination by independent expert selected by APRA – Damages – Loss of royalty payments and interest on royalties – Loss of mention on television series credits - Aggravating factors: flagrancy and benefit to respondent.
Copyright Act 1968, ss10, 32, 35, 36. 78 and 115(4)
JOHN PRIOR v ZELDA SHELDON, STUART SHELDON and ARTEC SOUND VISION PRODUCTIONS PTY LIMITED
ARTEC SOUND VISION PRODUCTIONS PTY LIMITED (Cross Claimant)
JOHN PRIOR (Cross Respondent)NG 687 of 1998
WILCOX J
SYDNEY
7 APRIL 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALESDISTRICT REGISTRY
NG687 of 1998
BETWEEN:
JOHN PRIOR
ApplicantAND:
ZELDA SHELDON
First RespondentSTUART SHELDON
Second RespondentAnd
ARTEC SOUND VISION PRODUCTIONS PTY LIMITED
Third RespondentARTEC SOUND VISION PRODUCTIONS PTY LIMITED
Cross claimantAnd
JOHN PRIOR
Cross respondentJUDGE:
WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER:
7 APRIL 2000
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.It be declared that:
(a)the applicant, John Prior, and the first respondent, Zelda Sheldon, are the joint authors of the musical work known as the theme for the television series “The Great Outdoors”, composed in 1992;
(b)copyright subsists in that work, in an adaptation of that work made in 1994 and in adaptations of the themes for background music of the series;
(c)the applicant and the third respondent, Artec Sound Vision Productions Pty Ltd, as assignee of the first respondent, are joint owners of the said copyrights.
2.Judgment be entered in favour of the applicant, John Prior, against:
(a)the first respondent, Zelda Sheldon, in the sum of seventy six thousand seven hundred and fourteen dollars and twenty six cents ($76,714.26);
(b)the second respondent, Stuart Sheldon, in the sum of one thousand three hundred and forty two dollars and forty two cents ($1,342.42).
3.The cross-claim be dismissed.
4.The first and second respondents, Zelda Sheldon and Stuart Sheldon, pay the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with the principal proceeding.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALESDISTRICT REGISTRY
NG687 of 1998
BETWEEN:
JOHN PRIOR
ApplicantAND:
ZELDA SHELDON
First RespondentSTUART SHELDON
Second RespondentAnd
ARTEC SOUND VISION PRODUCTIONS PTY LIMITED
Third RespondentARTEC SOUND VISION PRODUCTIONS PTY LIMITED
Cross claimantAnd
JOHN PRIOR
Cross respondent
JUDGE:
WILCOX J
DATE:
7 APRIL 2000
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
WILCOX J: At issue in this case is the authorship of two original musical works, both associated with a television series called “The Great Outdoors”.
The first work is the original theme music for the series. The case of the applicant, John Prior, is that this was a work of joint authorship by himself and Zelda Sheldon, the first…
Continue reading Prior v Sheldon
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Prior v Sheldon [2000] FCA 438
- Case
- [2000] FCA 438
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around the determination of authorship and the extent of Prior's contribution to the creation of the theme and stings. The court had to examine the evidence presented by both parties to ascertain whether Prior's involvement warranted recognition as a co-author. Additionally, the court had to determine the appropriate quantum of damages to be awarded to Prior for the infringement of his copyright and for loss of royalties due to the failure to recognise his authorship.
In its reasoning, the court noted the conflicting evidence from both Prior and the Sheldons regarding the composition process. However, the court found that the evidence indicated Prior made significant contributions to the theme and stings, particularly in the development of the musical arrangement and performance. The court emphasised that the test for authorship is not based on the length of time spent on the work but on the quality and nature of the contribution. The court concluded that Prior was a joint author of the works and awarded him damages for the loss of royalties and credits. The court also took into account the aggravating factors of the Sheldons' actions, including their flagrant disregard for Prior's rights and the personal benefit they derived from the infringement.
The final orders of the court declared that John Prior and Zelda Sheldon were joint authors of the musical works in question, and that copyright subsisted in those works. Judgment was entered in favour of Prior against the Sheldons for the sum of $76,714.26 plus interest and costs. The cross-claim by the Sheldons was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. It be declared that:
(a) the applicant, John Prior, and the first respondent, Zelda Sheldon, are the joint authors of the musical work known as the theme for the television series “The Great Outdoors”, composed in 1992;
(b) copyright subsists in that work, in an adaptation of that work made in 1994 and in adaptations of the themes for background music of the series;
(c) the applicant and the third respondent, Artec Sound Vision Productions Pty Ltd, as assignee of the first respondent, are joint owners of the said copyrights.
2. Judgment be entered in favour of the applicant, John Prior, against:
(a) the first respondent, Zelda Sheldon, in the sum of seventy six thousand seven hundred and fourteen dollars and twenty six cents ($76,714.26);
(b) the second respondent, Stuart Sheldon, in the sum of one thousand three hundred and forty two dollars and forty two cents ($1,342.42).
3. The cross-claim be dismissed.
4. The first and second respondents, Zelda Sheldon and Stuart Sheldon, pay the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with the principal proceeding.
Background
Background to the litigation
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: WILCOX J
The critical issue in relation to the stings is not the length of time Mr Sheldon was present, but whether he made a creative contribution in the music. I will return to that issue.(v)APRA registration The Australasian Performing Right Association (“APRA”) acts as the agent of composers to collect royalties due to them arising out of the public performance of their work, including on television. It can carry out this task only if it has particulars of works likely to earn royalties, with accurate information as to the identity of the person or persons entitled to receive those royalties. Registration of a work with APRA is therefore a matter of importance to a composer, especially a composer of a work, like the theme for a television series, that is likely to be played publicly on numerous occasions. Mr Prior gave evidence that, at the meeting of 21 November 1992, he produced an APRA registration card for the theme of “The Great Outdoors” and asked Ms Sheldon to sign it. The card distributed entitlement to royalty payments equally between Ms Sheldon and Mr Prior. Ms Sheldon failed to sign the card and Mr Prior subsequently decided to proceed unilaterally. On 15 February 1993 he submitted to APRA a registration card, signed only by himself, in which he attributed 50% of the royalty rights to Sorena (on the basis it was the owner of the lyric heard with the musical theme) and 25% to each of Ms Sheldon and himself. On the same day he submitted a further registration card covering the 14 stings, in which he claimed 100% of the royalty rights. Under cross-examination, Mr Prior said it was a “mistake” for him not to have shown these cards to the Sheldons at that time, but he said his relationship with them was then very poor and he had thought it would be a waste of time to do so. On 8 March 1993 APRA notified Mr Prior that it had omitted Sorena from the interests registered in respect of the theme (apparently on the basis that the “lyric” consisted only of the vocalised title of the work) and was crediting interests of 50% to each of Ms Sheldon and himself. The letter went on:“Under normal circumstances APRA would return the card to you to obtain the co-writer’s signature or contact the co-writer, direct to ascertain whether she agrees with the percentages allocated. You have requested this not be done as you are taking legal action and contact with Zelda Sheldon could jeopardise an already precarious situation further for you.We will note our files and await your advice if and when the situation sorts itself out or when Zelda Sheldon registers the work.”(vi)The APRA dispute On 14 April 1993 Ms Sheldon lodged with APRA an application in respect of “The Great Outdoors” theme in which she claimed a 100% interest. APRA informed Mr Prior of the application in a letter dated 13 July. At about that same time, APRA sent out to members its half-yearly royalty statements and cheques. On perusing her royalty statement, Ms Sheldon realised she had been paid only 50% of the royalties due in respect of “The Great Outdoors” theme. She contacted APRA and was told of Mr Prior’s competing claim.