| CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER | |
| CITATION: | Pratt v Bindaree Beef Pty Ltd [2024] NSWPIC 386 |
| APPLICANT: | Pamela Pratt |
| RESPONDENT: | Bindaree Beef Pty Limited |
| MEMBER: | Gaius Whiffin |
| DATE OF DECISION: | 18 July 2024 |
CATCHWORDS: | WORKERS COMPENSATION - Workers Compensation Act 1987; claim for injury to left ankle with consequential conditions to lumbar spine, left hip, and right hip alleged to result from the left ankle injury; chronic pain; claim for compensation pursuant to section 66; consideration of applicant’s statements, medical reports, other treatment records, and claim correspondence; whether the applicant sustained consequential conditions to her lumbar spine, left hip, and right hip resulting from the accepted left ankle injury sustained; how the terms of the referral to medical assessment of the applicant’s chronic pain should be worded; Chapter 17 of the SIRA NSW Workers Compensation Guidelines for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th ed, 1 March 2021; Sakr v Merrylands Christian Preschool Association Inc, Kumar v Royal Comfort Bedding Pty Ltd, Kooragang Cement Pty Ltd v Bates, Moon v Conmah Pty Ltd, Nguyen v Cosmopolitan Homes, Drca v KAB Seating Systems Pty Ltd, and Arquero v Shannons Anti Corrosion Engineers Pty Ltd considered; Held – the applicant has sustained consequential conditions to her lumbar spine, left hip, and right hip resulting from the accepted left ankle injury which she sustained; matter remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor to determine permanent impairment. |
| DETERMINATIONS MADE: | The Commission determines: 1. The applicant has sustained consequential injuries to her left hip, right hip, and lumbar spine, resulting from the accepted left ankle injury which she sustained on 6 May 2016. The Commission orders: 1. I remit this dispute to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor pursuant to s 321 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998, for assessment as follows: (a) date of injury: 6 May 2016; (b) body systems/parts: (i) left lower extremity (ankle and hip), (ii) right lower extremity (hip), (iii) lumbar spine, (iv) chronic pain (to be assessed if found in accordance with Chapter 17 of the SIRA NSW Workers Compensation Guidelines for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 4th ed, 1 March 2021 - but noting that the respondent disputes that chronic pain could be found), and (c) method of assessment: whole person impairment. 2. The documents to be reviewed by the Medical Assessor are: (a) the Application to Resolve a Dispute and attached documents; (b) the respondent’s Reply and attached documents; (c) the applicant’s Application to Admit Late Documents dated 27 June 2024 and attached documents; (d) the respondent’s Application to Admit Late Documents dated 26 June 2024 and attached documents, and (e) this Certificate of Determination. |
STATEMENT OF REASONS
BACKGROUND
Pamela Pratt (the applicant) is 63-years-old. She was employed by Bindaree Beef Pty Limited (the respondent) as a quality assurance officer, when she sustained an injury to her left ankle on 6 May 2016.
The respondent has accepted that this injury is…
Continue reading Pratt v Bindaree Beef Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Pratt v Bindaree Beef Pty Ltd [2024] NSWPIC 386
- Case
- [2024] NSWPIC 386
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal found that Pratt had sustained consequential conditions to her lumbar spine, left hip, and right hip as a result of the accepted left ankle injury. The decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of the medical evidence and the applicant’s statements. The Tribunal considered precedent cases such as Sakr v Merrylands Christian Preschool Association Inc, Kumar v Royal Comfort Bedding Pty Ltd, Kooragang Cement Pty Ltd v Bates, Moon v Conmah Pty Ltd, Nguyen v Cosmopolitan Homes, Drca v KAB Seating Systems Pty Ltd, and Arquero v Shannons Anti Corrosion Engineers Pty Ltd to support its findings. Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the matter to the President for the referral to a Medical Assessor to determine Pratt's permanent impairment.
The Tribunal further outlined the terms for the referral to ensure clarity and precision in the assessment of Pratt’s chronic pain. This included a detailed specification of the medical conditions to be evaluated and the application of the relevant guidelines and legal standards.
The final orders required the President to refer Pratt to a Medical Assessor to determine her permanent impairment, with specific terms for the assessment of her chronic pain and consequential conditions, in accordance with the Tribunal's findings and directions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.