Police v Taylah Blake

Case [2023] NSWLC 12


Local Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Police v Taylah Blake [2023] NSWLC 12
Hearing dates: 20 April 2023
Date of orders: 9 May 2023
Decision date: 09 May 2023
Jurisdiction:Coronial
Before: Magistrate P Stewart
Decision:

Convicted – fined $1,000 with Community Correction Order 2 years. Disqualified 12 months

Catchwords:

Negligent driving occasioning grievous bodily harm – failure to keep proper lookout – objective seriousness – need for general deterrence – denunciation – protection of the community – strong subjective case – inappropriate and improper to fail to record conviction to avoid consequential disqualification

Legislation Cited:

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)

Road Transport Act2013 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Application by the Attorney General under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for a Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under Section 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No. 3 of 2002) [2004] NSWCCA 303

Babineau v The Queen [2016] NSWDC 354

Gillmore v R [2016] NSWDC 401

Greaves v R [2020] NSWCCA 140

Griffith v Hutchinson & Anor (unreported NSWSC 1 February 1991)

Haoui v R [2008] NSWCCA 209

Khanwaiz v R [2012] NSWCCA 168

Markarian v The Queen (2005) 79 ALJR 1048

McGonigle v R [2020] NSWCCA 84

Park v The Queen [2021] HCA 37

R v Denis Ernest Fing NSWCCA (unreported 4 October 1994)

R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349

R v Fangaloka [2019] NSWCCA 173

R v Hopley [2008] NSWCCA 105

R v Kennedy [2000] NSWCCA 527

R v Mauger [2012] NSWCCA 51

R v Paris [2001] NSWCCA 83

R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] 49 NSWLR 383

Skocic v R [2014] NSWCCA 225

ST v R [2022] NSWCCA 169

Valentine v Eid (1992) 27 NSWLR 615

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW Police Force (prosecution) and
Taylah Blake (defendant)
Representation:

Sergeant Nolan, Police Prosecutor

W Pasterfield, Solicitor
File Number(s): 2023/00025841
Publication restriction: Nil

REMARKS ON SENTENCE

The Charges and the Pleas

  1. The offender Taylah Blake pleaded guilty to Negligent Driving Occasioning Grievous Bodily Harm contrary to section 117(1)(b) of the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW).

  2. The guilty plea was entered on 4 April 2023 at an early opportunity. I allow a discount of 25% for the utilitarian value of the plea to be applied against the appropriate penalty: see R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] 49 NSWLR 383 and s 22 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW).

Maximum Penalties

  1. The maximum penalty for the offence is nine months imprisonment and/ or a fine of up to 20 penalty units. Upon conviction, there is an automatic disqualification of three years which may be reduced to not less than 12 months if it is considered by the court appropriate to do so.

  2. I am required to assess the appropriate sentence having regard to the prescribed maximum penalty for the offence: see Park v Queen [2021] HCA 37 at [19]; Greaves v R [2020] NSWCCA 140 at [66] and Markarian v…

Continue reading Police v Taylah Blake

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Police v Taylah Blake [2023] NSWLC 12
Case
[2023] NSWLC 12
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of the Police versus Taylah Blake, the defendant was charged with negligent driving occasioning grievous bodily harm. The incident in question arose from the defendant’s failure to keep a proper lookout while driving, leading to a collision with another vehicle and resulting in significant injuries to the driver of that vehicle. The case was heard in the Magistrates' Court of Victoria.

The central legal issues that the court needed to address included the assessment of the defendant’s culpability for the incident, the appropriate level of punishment that would serve the purposes of general and specific deterrence, denunciation, and protection of the community, and whether it was appropriate to impose a conviction given the potential consequences for the defendant. The court had to determine whether the circumstances warranted a conviction and whether the potential disqualification from driving would unduly punish the defendant beyond the scope of justice.

The court found that the defendant had indeed failed to maintain a proper lookout, which constituted a significant lapse in her duty of care. Given the objective seriousness of the injuries sustained by the other driver, the court deemed it necessary to impose a punishment that would serve the purposes of general deterrence and denunciation. The strong evidence against the defendant created a robust case for conviction. The court held that it was inappropriate and improper to refrain from recording a conviction merely to avoid the consequential disqualification from driving, as the public interest in deterring such conduct outweighed the potential hardship to the individual defendant.

The court convicted the defendant and imposed a fine of $1,000 along with a Community Correction Order for two years. Additionally, the defendant was disqualified from driving for a period of 12 months.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted – fined $1,000 with Community Correction Order 2 years. Disqualified 12 months

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.