Local Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Police v Smith, Mark Joseph [2015] NSWLC 18 Hearing dates: 18 August 2015 Decision date: 29 September 2015 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: D Williams LCM Decision: The accused is found not guilty of all charges
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – drive with mid-range PCA and other motor vehicle offences – admissibility of expert evidence – zolpidem intoxication – voluntariness – sane or insane automatism Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900, ss 66C, 428A, 428G
Evidence Act 1995, ss 79, 135Cases Cited: CTM v R (2008) 236 CLR 440
Green v R (1971) 126 CLR 28
Hadba v R (2004) 146 A Crim R 291
Woodbridge v R [2010] NSWCCA 185Category: Principal judgment Parties: NSW Police
Mark Joseph Smith (the accused)Representation: Sgt J McLoughlin (for the NSW Police)
Mr T Heenan (solicitor for the accused)
File Number(s): 2014/192501
Judgment
-
At about 3.00 in the morning on the 5th of April last year, police were called to a single-vehicle car accident on Pittwater Road in Dee Why. When they arrived they found the accused, Mark Smith, trapped in the driver's seat of his car, which had crashed into a power pole. A taxi driver who saw the crash said that the accused's car wasn't speeding and didn't swerve or take any evasive action - it simply entered the intersection of Lismore Avenue and Pittwater Road, drove through it and crashed into the power pole on the other side. The crash took place about 2 kilometres from the accused's home, and at the time, the accused's car was travelling towards, rather than away from, his home.
-
People who spoke with Mr Smith at the scene reported that he was somewhat incoherent, and was not speaking in complete sentences. He did, however, tell them his name. They noticed that he smelled strongly of alcohol.
-
Mr Smith had to be cut out of his car, and he was taken to hospital with significant injuries. His blood was tested, and he was found to have a blood alcohol reading of 0.110, which is well into the mid-range. Also in his blood were a number of prescription medications, including the sleeping medication stilnox, the active ingredient of which is a drug called zolpidem. Mr Smith suffers from a number of complex and inter-related medical conditions, and it is not ultimately disputed that all of the medications, including stilnox, had been prescribed for him by medical practitioners. The prescription medications were at therapeutic levels.
-
Mr Smith says he has no memory of driving his car. He says that on the day leading up to the crash, he had visited a sick child in hospital, and that child sadly died. Despite a history of alcohol abuse, Mr Smith had been abstinent from alcohol for a considerable period of time, but upon the passing of the young child, he decided to get drunk. After returning to his home by public transport, he says he walked down to the Collaroy Beach Club, a…
Continue reading Police v Smith, Mark Joseph
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Police v Smith, Mark Joseph [2015] NSWLC 18
- Case
- [2015] NSWLC 18
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to resolve included whether the expert evidence provided by the accused's medical expert, which centred on the effects of zolpidem and its impact on the accused's ability to control his actions, was admissible and whether it could establish that the accused was in a state of automatism. Furthermore, the court had to determine whether this alleged state of automatism was due to a voluntary act (involuntary intoxication) or a medical condition (insanity). This distinction is crucial as it determines the voluntariness of the accused's actions and thus his criminal liability.
The court found that the expert evidence was admissible and persuasive, particularly in light of the accused's medical history and the specific circumstances surrounding the offence. It was determined that the accused's consumption of zolpidem, coupled with alcohol, led to a state of automatism where he was unable to control his actions. The court was satisfied that this state was not due to a voluntary act but rather a consequence of the involuntary intoxication. Consequently, the court concluded that the accused's actions were not voluntary, and thus, he was not criminally liable for the offences.
The final orders of the court were that the accused, Mark Joseph Smith, be found not guilty of all charges brought against him.
Orders
Orders of the court
The accused is found not guilty of all charges
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.