FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pizzino v Caratti (No 4) [2025] FCA 657
File number: WAD 230 of 2023 Judgment of: COLVIN J Date of judgment: 18 June 2025 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - where applicant failed to meet time for filing second further substituted statement of claim - where solicitors for applicant have ceased to act - where issues raised concerning physical and mental health of the applicant - consideration of circumstances in which litigation representative may be required to be appointed - orders made for any application to extend time to file second further substituted statement of claim to be made by specific date - case management hearing adjourned to a date at which respondent may move for orders dismissing proceedings if non-compliance Cases cited: AYZ v State of Western Australia (Department of Justice, Corrective Services) (No 2) [2022] FCA 1540
Drummond v Canberra Institute of Technology (No 3) [2022] FCAFC 169; (2022) 294 FCR 346
Neave v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 1030
Division: General Division Registry: Western Australia National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance Number of paragraphs: 16 Date of hearing: 18 June 2025 Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant did not appear Counsel for the Respondent: Mr CG Mofflin Solicitor for the Respondent: Alan Rumsley - Commercial Lawyer ORDERS
WAD 230 of 2023 BETWEEN: ALBERTO PIZZINO
Applicant
AND: ALLEN BRUCE CARATTI
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
COLVIN J
DATE OF ORDER:
18 JUNE 2025
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.On or before 12.00 pm on 25 July 2025, the applicant do file and serve any application to extend the time to file a second further substituted statement of claim.
2.The case management hearing be otherwise adjourned until 10.15 am on 30 July 2025 at which time the respondent may move for orders dismissing the proceedings if appropriate steps to progress the proceedings have not been taken by the applicant.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
COLVIN J:
In September 2023, Mr Alberto Pizzino and his three sisters commenced proceedings in this Court against Mr Allen Caratti. They concerned dealings that had resulted in the sale by them of a property in Bennett Springs to a company of which Mr Caratti was a director, being West Swan Land Company Pty Ltd (WSLC). The relevant events are said to have occurred between 2005 and 2012 and to have included the entry into a deed of settlement and release. It appears to be common ground that an amount of $4 million that was to be paid by WSLC to Mr Pizzino and his sisters in respect of the transfer of the land to WSLC has never been paid, yet WSLC obtained full title to the land.
For some time, the proceedings were conducted for the applicants by Mr Bruce…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Pizzino v Caratti (No 4) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] FCA 657
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the applicant's health issues justified the need for a litigation representative and how to manage the delay in filing the statement of claim. The court held that any application to extend time must be made by a specific date and that the case management hearing would be adjourned to allow the respondent an opportunity to move for orders dismissing the proceedings if the applicant did not take appropriate steps to progress the matter.
The court ordered that the applicant must file and serve any application to extend the time to file a second further substituted statement of claim by 12.00 pm on 25 July 2025. The case management hearing was to be adjourned until 10.15 am on 30 July 2025, at which time the respondent could move for orders dismissing the proceedings if the applicant had not taken appropriate steps to progress the matter. The orders were made in accordance with Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. On or before 12.00 pm on 25 July 2025, the applicant do file and serve any application to extend the time to file a second further substituted statement of claim.
2. The case management hearing be otherwise adjourned until 10.15 am on 30 July 2025 at which time the respondent may move for orders dismissing the proceedings if appropriate steps to progress the proceedings have not been taken by the applicant.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.