Pearce (Trustee) v Mulhern (Bankrupt) (No 4)

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Pearce (Trustee) v Mulhern (Bankrupt) (No 4) [2012] FCA 54

Citation: Pearce (Trustee) v Mulhern (Bankrupt) (No 4) [2012] FCA 54
Parties: MARK WILLIAM PEARCE AND ANDREW JOHN HEERS AS TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN ALSO KNOWN AS DEREK O'MALLEY (A BANKRUPT) v MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN ALSO KNOWN AS DEREK O'MALLEY (A BANKRUPT)
File number(s): QUD 176 of 2011
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 2 February 2012
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application for return of passport – whether just and equitable to do so – where respondent bankrupt had complied with obligations under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
Cases cited: Pearce (Trustee) v Mulhern (Bankrupt) [2011] FCA 930
Pearce (Trustee) v Mulhern (Bankrupt) (No 2) [2012] FCA 7
Pearce (Trustee) v Mulhern (Bankrupt) (No 3) [2012] FCA 16
Re Hicks; Ex parte Lamb (1994) 217 ALR 195
Re Tyndall (1977) 30 FLR 6
Sharma v Pattison [2006] FCA 287
Date of hearing: 2 February 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Solicitor for the First Applicant: Mr Paul Lynch of Lynch Morgan Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr M Southwick

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

QUD 176 of 2011
BETWEEN:

MARK WILLIAM PEARCE AND ANDREW JOHN HEERS AS TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN ALSO KNOWN AS DEREK O'MALLEY (A BANKRUPT)
Applicant
AND:

MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN ALSO KNOWN AS DEREK O'MALLEY (A BANKRUPT)
Respondent

JUDGE:

JAGOT J

DATE OF ORDER:

2 FEBRUARY 2012

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The interim application filed in Court today be dismissed.

2.The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of the interim application as agreed or taxed.

Note:    Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

QUD 176 of 2011
BETWEEN:

MARK WILLIAM PEARCE AND ANDREW JOHN HEERS AS TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN ALSO KNOWN AS DEREK O'MALLEY (A BANKRUPT)
Applicant
AND:

MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN ALSO KNOWN AS DEREK O'MALLEY (A BANKRUPT)
Respondent

JUDGE:

JAGOT J

DATE:

2 FEBRUARY 2012

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. This is an interim application made by Mr Mulhern, a bankrupt, against the trustees of his property (the Trustees) for orders to the effect that the Trustees deliver up to Mr Mulhern his Australian and Irish passports and forthwith give to him their consent in writing to proposed overseas travel. The application is brought pursuant to s 178 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (the Bankruptcy Act). 

  2. The dealings between the Trustees and Mr Mulhern have been before this Court on at least three earlier occasions.  On 9 August 2011, Logan J issued a warrant for Mr Mulhern’s arrest: see Pearce (Trustee) v Mulhern (Bankrupt) [2011] FCA 930. This was done under s 78 of the Bankruptcy Act. In his reasons for decision published on…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Pearce (Trustee) v Mulhern (Bankrupt) (No 4) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] FCA 54
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Pearce (Trustee) v Mulhern (Bankrupt) (No 4) case involved the trustee of a bankrupt estate, Pearce, and the bankrupt individual, Mulhern. The dispute centred around an application for the return of Mulhern's passport, which had been seized by Pearce. The matter was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The central legal issues the court had to address were whether it was just and equitable to return the passport to Mulhern, given that she had fulfilled her obligations under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).

The court examined the statutory framework provided by the Bankruptcy Act and considered Mulhern's compliance with her obligations. The judge assessed whether the return of the passport would serve the interests of justice and equity, taking into account Mulhern's compliance and the broader context of her bankruptcy proceedings. The court noted that the statutory provisions did not explicitly address the return of a passport in such circumstances, requiring the court to interpret the law in light of equitable principles.

Ultimately, the court dismissed the interim application for the return of the passport. The judge found that, while Mulhern had complied with her obligations, the circumstances did not warrant the return of the passport as a matter of justice and equity. The court also ordered that the applicant, Pearce, pay the respondent's costs of the interim application as agreed or taxed. This decision was made under the authority provided by Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011, governing the entry of orders in such proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The interim application filed in Court today be dismissed.

2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of the interim application as agreed or taxed.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.