FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mulhern v Pearce [2012] FCA 631
Citation: Mulhern v Pearce [2012] FCA 631 Parties: MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN (A BANKRUPT) v MARK WILLIAM PEARCE AND ANDREW JOHN HEERS (TRUSTEES) and JOSEPH MICHAEL DODRILL File number(s): QUD 244 of 2012 Judge: GREENWOOD J Date of judgment: 19 June 2012 Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – consideration of an application for review under s 178 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) of a decision of the trustees of a bankrupt refusing the bankrupt’s application for the return of passports and travel documentation – consideration of an application to extend time for making an application for leave to appeal – consideration of circumstances surrounding the dismissal of the applicant’s application for annulment of the bankruptcy under s 153B of the Bankruptcy Act Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 48, 153B, 178(1)
Federal Court Rules 2011, rules 36.01, 35.12, 35.13 and 35.14
Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2005, rules 7.02, 7.03Cases cited: Re Tyndall (1977) 30 FLR 6 – cited
Re Hicks; Ex parte Lamb (1994) 217 ALR 195 – cited
Mulhern, in the matter of Mulhern (Bankrupt) v Pearce (Trustee) [2012] FCA 570 – cited and quoted
Pearce (Trustee) v Mulhern (Bankrupt) (No 4) [2012] FCA 54 – cited
Pearce v Mulhern [2010] FCA 446 – citedDate of hearing: 5 June 2012 Date of last submissions: 5 June 2012 Place: Brisbane Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 52 Counsel for the Appellant: Appellant appeared in person Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr Lynch, Lynch Morgan Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
QUD 244 of 2012
BETWEEN: MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN (A BANKRUPT)
Applicant AppellantAND: MARK WILLIAM PEARCE AND ANDREW JOHN HEERS (TRUSTEES)
First RespondentJOSEPH MICHAEL DODRILL
Second Respondent
JUDGE:
GREENWOOD J
DATE OF ORDER:
19 JUNE 2012
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The application under rule 35.14 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 to extend time for leave to appeal from orders of the Court made on 19 April 2012 is dismissed.
2.The applicant pay the costs of the respondent trustees of and incidental to the application to be taxed.
3.The interlocutory application filed electronically on 31 May 2012 for review under s 178(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) of a decision of the trustees of the bankrupt is dismissed.
4.The applicant pay the costs of the respondent trustees of and incidental to the interlocutory application to be taxed.
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
QUD 244 of 2012
BETWEEN: MICHAEL RICHARD MULHERN (A BANKRUPT)
Applicant AppellantAND: MARK WILLIAM PEARCE AND ANDREW JOHN HEERS (TRUSTEES)
First RespondentJOSEPH MICHAEL DODRILL
Second Respondent
JUDGE:
GREENWOOD J
DATE:
19 JUNE 2012
PLACE:
BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
These proceedings concern two applications made by Mr Michael Richard Mulhern. Both applications have been heard together.
The first application in time is an application under…
Continue reading Mulhern v Pearce
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Mulhern v Pearce [2012] FCA 631
- Case
- [2012] FCA 631
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to decide included whether the trustees' decision to refuse the return of the applicant's passports and travel documentation was reasonable and lawful. The court also had to determine whether the applicant's application for an extension of time for leave to appeal was justified and whether the applicant's application for annulment of the bankruptcy was valid. The court considered the relevant provisions of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and the circumstances surrounding the case.
The court found that the trustees' decision to refuse the return of the applicant's passports and travel documentation was reasonable and lawful. The court also found that the applicant's application for an extension of time for leave to appeal was unjustified and that the applicant's application for annulment of the bankruptcy was invalid. The court dismissed the application for review under section 178(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and the application for an extension of time for leave to appeal. The court also dismissed the applicant's application for annulment of the bankruptcy.
The court ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the respondent trustees of and incidental to the application to be taxed, and that the interlocutory application filed electronically on 31 May 2012 for review under section 178(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) of a decision of the trustees of the bankrupt was dismissed. The applicant also had to pay the costs of the respondent trustees of and incidental to the interlocutory application to be taxed. The entry of orders was dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application under rule 35.14 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 to extend time for leave to appeal from orders of the Court made on 19 April 2012 is dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the costs of the respondent trustees of and incidental to the application to be taxed.
3. The interlocutory application filed electronically on 31 May 2012 for review under s 178(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) of a decision of the trustees of the bankrupt is dismissed.
4. The applicant pay the costs of the respondent trustees of and incidental to the interlocutory application to be taxed.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.