Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2005] AATA 1243
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) Nos T2001/113 and T2001/182
VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION ) Re SYDNEY JAMES PATTERSON Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Associate Professor B W Davis AM (Part-time Member) Date16 December 2005
PlaceHobart
Decision 1. The decision under review is set aside and in substitution thereof the Tribunal finds that the disabilities of:
Alcohol dependence or abuse
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
are war-caused within the meaning of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and amendments.
2. The matter is remitted to the Repatriation Commission for calculation of pension payable, the earliest date being 19 February 1999.
[Sgd B W Davis]
Part-Time Member
[2005] AATA 1243
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL ) T2001/113
) and
VETERANS’ APPEALS DIVISION ) T2001/182Re : SYDNEY JAMES PATTERSON
Applicant
And : REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
CORRIGENDUM
Tribunal : Assoc Prof B W Davis AM (Part-Time Member)
Date : 4 January 2006
Place : Hobart
Decision: Following a request for clarification, the decision of 16 December 2005 is varied to read as follows:
1. Re T2001/113 the decision under review is set aside and in substitution thereof the Tribunal finds that the disabilities of:
Alcohol dependence or abuse
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
are war-caused within the meaning of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and amendments
2. Re T2001/182 the Tribunal affirms the VRB decision of 3 July 2001 that bilateral congenital hallux vulgas and osteoarthritis of both feet are war-caused disabilities within the meaning of Section 9 of the Act. No evidence has been submitted to demonstrate worsening of these disabilities since 2001, hence no increase in pension arises in respect of them
3. Having considered all evidence before it and noting provisions in GARP (the Guide to Assessment of Rates of Veterans’ Pensions) the Tribunal has determined that the applicant should be paid disability pension at 100 per cent of the General Rate from 19 February 1999. The case for payment at the Special Rate is not made out, but the matter is remitted to the Repatriation Commission for consideration.
[Sgd Assoc Prof B W Davis]
Part-Time Member
CATCHWORDS
Veterans' Entitlements - operational service - Vietnam - disability pension - bilateral congenital hallux valgus - osteoarthritis of both feet - alcohol dependence or abuse - post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) - severe stressor - reasonable hypothesis - Statements of Principles (SoP) - Veterans' Review Board (VRB).
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and Amendments – ss9, 13(1), 120(1) and (3), 120A
Repatriation Commission v Deledio [1998] 83 FCR 82
Bushell v Repatriation Commission [1992] 105 ALR 30; 175 CLR 408
Byrnes v Repatriation Commission [1993] 116 ALR 210
Stoddart v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCA 334; 74 ALD 336
Woodward v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCA 160
Constable v Repatriation Commission [2005] FCA 928
Re Demczuk and Repatriation Commission [2005] AATA 1012 (12 October 2005)
Re Skewes and Repatriation Commission [2005] AATA 1026 (17 October 2005)
REASONS FOR DECISION
16 December 2005 Associate Professor…
Continue reading Patterson and Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Patterson and Repatriation Commission [2005] AATA 1243
- Case
- [2005] AATA 1243
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the statutory framework, particularly sections 9, 13(1), 120(1) and (3), and 120A of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and amendments. It also reviewed relevant case law, including Repatriation Commission v Deledio, Bushell v Repatriation Commission, Byrnes v Repatriation Commission, Stoddart v Repatriation Commission, Woodward v Repatriation Commission, Constable v Repatriation Commission, Re Demczuk and Repatriation Commission, and Re Skewes and Repatriation Commission. The court examined the evidence regarding Patterson’s service in Vietnam, his medical history, and the expert opinions provided. It focused on whether there was a reasonable hypothesis linking his service to the claimed disabilities, particularly for alcohol dependence or abuse and PTSD.
After considering the evidence and applying the relevant legal principles, the court found that there was a reasonable hypothesis that Patterson's alcohol dependence or abuse and PTSD were caused by his service in Vietnam. The court set aside the decision of the Repatriation Commission and substituted its own finding that these disabilities were war-caused. The matter was then remitted to the Repatriation Commission to calculate the pension payable, with the earliest date being 19 February 1999.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The decision under review is set aside and in substitution thereof the Tribunal finds that the disabilities of:
Alcohol dependence or abuse
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
are war-caused within the meaning of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and amendments.
2. The matter is remitted to the Repatriation Commission for calculation of pension payable, the earliest date being 19 February 1999.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.