CITATION: NW v New South Wales Fire Brigades (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 61 DIVISION: General Division PARTIES: APPLICANT
NW
RESPONDENT
New South Wales Fire BrigadesFILE NUMBER: 043031 HEARING DATES: 19/09/2005 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 09/19/2005
DATE OF DECISION:
03/03/2006BEFORE: O'Connor K - DCJ (President) CATCHWORDS: Review of conduct of public sector agency MATTER FOR DECISION: Order LEGISLATION CITED: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Industrial Relations Act 1996
Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998CASES CITED: NW v New South Wales Fire Brigades [2005] NSWADT 73
NR and NP v Roads and Traffic Authority [2004] NSWADT 276
FM v Vice Chancellor, Macquarie University [2003] NSWADT 78
Vice-Chancellor Macquarie University v FM [2005] NSWCA 192
March v Stramare (1991) 171 CLR 506
Rummery and Federal Privacy Commissioner and anor [2004] AATA 1221
D & R Commercial Pty Ltd v Flood (2002) 113 IR 344
Gamble v Alaska Air Pty Ltd [2005] NSWIRComm 1063
RD v Department of Education and Training [2005] NSWADT 195REPRESENTATION: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
J Nolan of counsel instructed by G Lowe, NSW Fire Brigade Employees' Union
S Prince of counsel instructed by P Macken, solicitor, Leigh Virtue & AssociatesORDERS: 1. Pursuant to s 55(2)(c) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998, that the respondent agency formulate, after appropriate consultation, a statement of practice in relation to the use and disclosure of personal information contained in occurrence books; to do so within 6 months; and to place the statement in the occurrence books or in some nearby location where it can be readily consulted. Any variation of the terms of this order only to occur if approved by the Office of Privacy Commissioner; 2. Applicant to pay the respondent’s costs of counsel’s attendance on 8 August 2005, if he had been briefed prior to 2 August 2005.
1 The Tribunal has found that the respondent agency, New South Wales Fire Brigades (NSWFB), contravened the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (the Privacy Act) in disclosing personal information about the applicant to the Shire of Sutherland: see NW v New South Wales Fire Brigades [2005] NSWADT 73.
2 The brief facts were these. The applicant was as at May 2003 a permanent employee of the Council of the Shire of Sutherland. He had permission to engage in secondary employment, as a retained firefighter with NSWFB attached to the Balgownie Local Unit. A retained firefighter is called up for duty on an as-needed basis. The manager at Sutherland contacted NSWFB because of suspicions he had that the applicant had worked as a firefighter on some days in early 2003 despite having taken sick leave from the Council. If true this was a breach of his leave conditions. The NSWFB replied to the Council’s enquiries by examining the unit’s day book, the occurrence book and advised the Council as to whether he had attended for duty on the days identified by the Council. There was a number of days of attendance recorded in the occurrence book. The…
Continue reading NW v New South Wales Fire Brigades (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- NW v New South Wales Fire Brigades (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 61
- Case
- [2006] NSWADT 61
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the New South Wales Fire Brigades did not have a formal statement of practice in relation to the use and disclosure of personal information contained in the occurrence books. It was determined that such a statement was necessary to ensure compliance with the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998. The court ordered the respondent agency to formulate a statement of practice after appropriate consultation with relevant stakeholders. The order specified that this statement must be formulated within six months and be placed in the occurrence books or in a nearby location for easy reference. Furthermore, any variation of the terms of this order would only be permissible if approved by the Office of Privacy Commissioner.
In addition to the aforementioned order, the court also ruled that the applicant, NW, was to pay the respondent's costs of counsel's attendance on 8 August 2005, provided the counsel had been briefed prior to 2 August 2005.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to s 55(2)(c) of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998, that the respondent agency formulate, after appropriate consultation, a statement of practice in relation to the use and disclosure of personal information contained in occurrence books; to do so within 6 months; and to place the statement in the occurrence books or in some nearby location where it can be readily consulted. Any variation of the terms of this order only to occur if approved by the Office of Privacy Commissioner; 2. Applicant to pay the respondent’s costs of counsel’s attendance on 8 August 2005, if he had been briefed prior to 2 August 2005.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.