Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2004] AATA 1033
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No N2003/188
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION ) N2004/918 Re MONG CHI NGO Applicant
And
AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Senior Member M D Allen;
Dr M E C Thorpe, MemberDate1 October 2004
PlaceSydney
Decision (1) The reviewable decision of 19 December 2002 is set aside and this matter remitted to the Respondent with the direction that the Applicant is entitled to compensation for the work- caused injury of carpal tunnel syndrome right wrist.
(2) The reviewable decision of 2 December 2003 relating to permanent impairment is affirmed.
(3) The Respondent is to pay the Applicant's costs.(Sgd) M D ALLEN
………………………………
Presiding Member
10. The Tribunal was shown a film of the Spectrum 10 machine in operation. Coding is done with the right hand onto a small keypad. We accept the Applicant’s evidence that the rate of work required was to enter the post codes from between 750 to 850 mail items per 45 minutes. Duties were rotated but the Applicant would have had up to four periods of 45 minutes each undertaking coding work during her shift.
11. On 16 August 1999 the Applicant consulted her General Practitioner, a Dr Garber and gave him a history of one month waking at night with tingling and numbness in the tips of her fingers in the right hand. Dr Garber made a provisional diagnosis of carpel tunnel syndrome and prescribed the use of a wrist splint at night. In September 1999 the Applicant returned to Dr Garber complaining of ongoing symptoms and he instructed her in the correct strapping of the wrist guard. Dr Garber’s clinical notes read inter alia “ongoing problem with right carpal tunnel syndrome but using incorrect wrist guard”.
12. These consultations with Dr Garber are important in the aetiology of the Applicant’s injury. Although in evidence in chief she stated that it was not until she undertook coding duties that she experienced numbness and tingling in her fingers, the clinical notes of Dr Garber clearly reveal that the Applicant had suffered the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome prior to commencing work at the Sydney West Mail facility and undertaking coding.
13. That the Applicant’s symptoms of a carpal tunnel syndrome first arose at home is confirmed by the history taken by Dr Chase when the Applicant first consulted him on 23 August 2001, at the request of the Respondent. Dr Chase refers to an exercise bike and this was disputed by the Applicant. Just what the Applicant did say to Dr Chase we do not need to resolve but we are satisfied that Dr Chase correctly obtained a history of symptoms beginning at home. However the history he obtained was that symptoms were first experienced in 2001.
14. Dr Chase provisionally diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome and recommended that the Applicant have surgery if that diagnosis was confirmed by nerve conduction studies.
15. The Applicant’s evidence was that…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Ngo and Australian Postal Corporation and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2004] AATA 1033
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the applicable provisions of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 and considered relevant case law, including Re Liu and Comcare and Hill and Commonwealth of Australia, to evaluate the Applicant's claims. The court found that the Respondent had a continuing liability to make compensation payments for the Applicant's right wrist injury, but the claim for permanent impairment was rejected. This conclusion was based on the evidence presented and the statutory provisions governing workers' compensation claims. The court highlighted the need to balance the requirements of the legislation with the specific circumstances of the case.
The decision of the court was that the reviewable decision dated 19 December 2002 was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Respondent with a direction that the Applicant was entitled to compensation for the work-caused injury of carpal tunnel syndrome in her right wrist. However, the reviewable decision dated 2 December 2003 relating to permanent impairment was affirmed. Additionally, the Respondent was ordered to pay the Applicant's costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The reviewable decision of 19 December 2002 is set aside and this matter remitted to the Respondent with the direction that the Applicant is entitled to compensation for the work- caused injury of carpal tunnel syndrome right wrist.
(2) The reviewable decision of 2 December 2003 relating to permanent impairment is affirmed.
(3) The Respondent is to pay the Applicant's costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.