Musicki v Google LLC

Case [2021] FCA 1393


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Musicki v Google LLC [2021] FCA 1393  

File number: VID 480 of 2021
Judgment of: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 5 November 2021
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for preliminary discovery pursuant to r 7.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – allegedly defamatory comments made online – respondent did not appear – application granted
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited:

Heath v LawTap Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 485

International Wushu Federation v Google LLC [2021] FCA 904

Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 13
Date of hearing: 5 November 2021
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: Matrix Legal

ORDERS

VID 480 of 2021
BETWEEN:

KORANA MUSICKI

Prospective Applicant

AND:

GOOGLE LLC

Prospective Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

MORTIMER J

DATE OF ORDER:

5 NOVEMBER 2021

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Google LLC give discovery to the Prospective Applicant of all documents that are or have been in Google LLC’s possession, power or control relating to the description of the prospective respondent, namely:

pseudonym: Dave Cross and user ID:

link to review:

to rr 10.42 and 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) the Prospective Applicant shall serve this order, and the Court’s reasons for judgment once published, upon Google LLC in the United States of America, in accordance with Article 10(a) of the “Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters” done at The Hague on 15 November 1965, by sending it by international registered post, with an acknowledgement of receipt to be provided to the Prospective Applicant, to the Respondent’s address for service at:

Google LLC
c/o Custodian of Records
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, California 94043
United States of America

and by sending it by email to Google LLC at google-legal-support@google.com and internationalcivil@google.com

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Delivered Ex Tempore and Revised)

MORTIMER J:

  1. The applicant, Dr Korana Musicki, has applied, by an originating application, dated 25 August 2021, for orders requiring Google LLC to provide preliminary discovery, pursuant to rule 7.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), of all documents or things in its possession or control relating to the description of an unknown person to be the prospective respondent, who posted, allegedly, defamatory comments about her.

  2. No notice of address for service for Google has been filed with the Court and no legal representative for Google sought to appear at the hearing. An affidavit of service has been filed. It was read on the application. In that affidavit, Mr Stanarevic, the applicant’s solicitor, deposes that, pursuant to orders made by the Court on 13 September 2021, he posted to Google LLC on 27 September 2021, by international registered post, the following documents: a copy of the Court’s orders, the originating application and his affidavit, both filed on 25 August 2021. He deposes that he also emailed the…

Continue reading Musicki v Google LLC

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Musicki v Google LLC [2021] FCA 1393
Case
[2021] FCA 1393
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Musicki v Google LLC involved an application for preliminary discovery by the plaintiff, seeking documents from the defendant, Google LLC, relating to allegedly defamatory comments made online. The case was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The plaintiff, Musicki, sought discovery of documents from Google LLC that pertained to a pseudonymous user, Dave Cross, who allegedly posted defamatory comments about Musicki on Google Maps. The defendant, Google LLC, did not appear before the court to contest the application.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the plaintiff was entitled to the discovery of documents pursuant to rule 7.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). The court needed to determine whether the application met the criteria for such discovery, particularly considering the defendant's failure to appear. The court also had to decide on the appropriate method for serving the order on Google LLC, given its international presence.

In granting the application, the court found that the plaintiff had sufficiently demonstrated the need for the discovery to pursue their defamation claim. The absence of the defendant did not preclude the granting of the order, as the court could proceed on the assumption that the defendant would not contest the application. The court ruled that the order should be served on Google LLC in the United States, in compliance with the Hague Service Convention, by sending it by international registered post and by email to specified addresses.

The court's final order mandated that Google LLC provide the plaintiff with all documents related to the pseudonym Dave Cross and the specified Google Maps review. Additionally, the order detailed the method of serving the court's decision on Google LLC, ensuring compliance with international service protocols.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Google LLC give discovery to the Prospective Applicant of all documents that are or have been in Google LLC’s possession, power or control relating to the description of the prospective respondent, namely:

pseudonym: Dave Cross and user ID:

https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/102570466144590922307

URL link to review:

https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/102570466144590922307/reviews/@-37.8445923,144.9793406,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m3!8m2!3m1!1e1?hl=en-AU

2. Pursuant to rr 10.42 and 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) the Prospective Applicant shall serve this order, and the Court’s reasons for judgment once published, upon Google LLC in the United States of America, in accordance with Article 10(a) of the “Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters” done at The Hague on 15 November 1965, by sending it by international registered post, with an acknowledgement of receipt to be provided to the Prospective Applicant, to the Respondent’s address for service at:

Google LLC

c/o Custodian of Records

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway

Mountain View, California 94043

United States of America

and by sending it by email to Google LLC at google-legal-support@google.com and internationalcivil@google.com

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.