FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kandola v Google LLC (No 2) [2021] FCA 1412
File number(s): NSD 865 of 2021 Judgment of: CHEESEMAN J Date of judgment: 12 November 2021 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for preliminary discovery pursuant to r 7.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – preliminary discovery sought in aid of commencing defamation proceedings arising from allegedly defamatory comments made online – first prospective respondent served but did not appear – application granted. Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 7.22(1), 10.42 and 10.43 Cases cited: Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction Number of paragraphs: 17 Date of hearing: 12 November 2021 Counsel for the Prospective Applicants: Ms R Kandola appeared for the prospective applicants ORDERS
NSD 865 of 2021 BETWEEN: MR TEJINDER SINGH KANDOLA
First Prospective Applicant
MS RACHEL KANDOLA
Second Prospective Applicant
AND: GOOGLE LLC
First Prospective Respondent
THRYV AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Second Prospective Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
CHEESEMAN J
DATE OF ORDER:
12 NOVEMBER 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.As soon as is reasonably practicable and in any event within 15 days of being served with this order by email in accordance with order 2, the first prospective respondent, Google LLC, shall provide to the prospective applicants by email to rachel@unicornair.com.au, the following information, to the extent that such information is available, in relation to the Google Search and Map reviews of Unicorn Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Pty Ltd linked with the Google Accounts:
(a)‘Frank H’ - align="left">(b)‘John S’ - subscriber information for the Accounts, including;
(i)the name of the users;
(ii)account creation information;
(iii)email addresses;
(iv)the IP addresses of logins;
(v)associated timestamps;
(vi)telephone numbers;
(vii)location metadata; and
(viii)other identifying details of other accounts originating from the same IP address, email address, and telephone number.
2.Pursuant to rr 10.42 and 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the prospective applicants be granted leave to serve this order, and the Court’s reasons for judgment once published (together, the Documents) upon Google in the United States of America in accordance with the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters done at the Hague on 15 November 1965, by sending the Documents using international registered post, with an acknowledgment of receipt to be provided by Google to the prospective applicants, addressed to:
(a)Google LLC
C/O Custodian of Records 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, California 94043 United States of America
and by sending the Documents by email to Google at the following addresses:
(b)google-legal-support@google.com; and
(c)internationalcivil@google.com
3.No order as to the costs of the present application.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Revised from transcript)
CHEESEMAN J:
These proceedings concern an application for preliminary discovery by the prospective applicants, Ms Rachel Kandola and Mr Tejinder Singh Kandola, against Google LLC and…
Continue reading Kandola v Google LLC (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Kandola v Google LLC (No 2) [2021] FCA 1412
- Case
- [2021] FCA 1412
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the applicants' need for the information to establish their defamation claim and the potential prejudice to Google if the discovery were granted. The applicants provided evidence of their impeccable reputation and the damage caused by the alleged defamatory comments. The court found that the applicants had made out a prima facie case for the relief sought and that the balance of convenience favoured granting the application. The court also noted that Google had not demonstrated any significant prejudice that would outweigh the applicants' need for the information.
The court granted the application for preliminary discovery, ordering Google to provide the requested information within 15 days of being served with the order. The court also granted leave for the applicants to serve the order and the reasons for judgment on Google in the United States of America, in accordance with the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters. The court made no order as to the costs of the application.
This decision highlights the importance of reputation and the potential impact of defamatory comments on a business and its owners. The court recognised the need for the applicants to obtain the necessary information to pursue their defamation claim and balanced this against the potential prejudice to Google. The case also demonstrates the court's willingness to grant relief under the Federal Court Rules to facilitate the resolution of cross-border disputes.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. As soon as is reasonably practicable and in any event within 15 days of being served with this order by email in accordance with order 2, the first prospective respondent, Google LLC, shall provide to the prospective applicants by email to rachel@unicornair.com.au, the following information, to the extent that such information is available, in relation to the Google Search and Map reviews of Unicorn Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Pty Ltd linked with the Google Accounts:
(a) ‘Frank H’ - https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/104300273246642518122/reviews/@-33.7201367,151.0988577,13z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m3!8m2!3m1!1e1?hl=en-AU
(b) ‘John S’ - https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/114831197671603278714/photos/@-33.7356666,151.1286799,15z/data=!4m3!8m2!3m1!1e1?hl=en-AU
the subscriber information for the Accounts, including;
(i) the name of the users;
(ii) account creation information;
(iii) email addresses;
(iv) the IP addresses of logins;
(v) associated timestamps;
(vi) telephone numbers;
(vii) location metadata; and
(viii) other identifying details of other accounts originating from the same IP address, email address, and telephone number.
2. Pursuant to rr 10.42 and 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the prospective applicants be granted leave to serve this order, and the Court’s reasons for judgment once published (together, the Documents) upon Google in the United States of America in accordance with the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters done at the Hague on 15 November 1965, by sending the Documents using international registered post, with an acknowledgment of receipt to be provided by Google to the prospective applicants, addressed to:
(a) Google LLC
C/O Custodian of Records 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, California 94043 United States of America
and by sending the Documents by email to Google at the following addresses:
(b) google-legal-support@google.com; and
(c) internationalcivil@google.com
3. No order as to the costs of the present application.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
Background
Background to the litigation
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.