Mr D v Ms P

Case [2020] NSWCA 174


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Mr D v Ms P [2020] NSWCA 174
Hearing dates: 10 August 2020
Date of orders: 13 August 2020
Decision date: 13 August 2020
Before: Bell P
Decision:

1.        To the extent necessary, grant leave nunc pro tunc to the Appellant pursuant to s 4 of the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) to institute appeal proceedings.

2. Pursuant to UCPR r 51.50(1), the Appellant is to provide security for the respondent's costs by paying into Court the sum of $25,000 or by way of charge over real property or in such other form as may be agreed between the parties which, if not provided earlier by way of charge, is to be paid in two tranches:

           (a)   as to $15,000 by 15 September 2020;

(b)   as to the balance ($10,000) by the date set by the Registrar for the filing of the Appellant’s submissions.

3. The proceedings are listed on 21 September 2020 for directions before the Registrar, or, in the event that the first tranche of security has not been provided, an order for the dismissal of the proceedings pursuant to UCPR r 51.50(2A) may be sought.

4.       The Appellant to pay the Respondent's costs of the Notice of Motion for security for costs.

5.       No order as to costs of the Appellant’s Notice of Motion.

Catchwords:

APPEAL – leave to proceed under Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) – criteria for grant of leave – meaning of “there is prima facie ground for the proceedings”.

APPEAL – security for costs – where security for costs sought against an individual appellant – where appellant was defendant at first instance – where appellant currently incarcerated – whether special circumstances existed warranting the grant of security for costs – where, irrespective of the outcome of the appeal, the appellant would still be liable to the respondent in a significant sum.

Legislation Cited:

Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) ss 4, 5

Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth)

Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 53 r 8

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 51.50

Felons (Civil Proceedings) Bill 1981 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Application of Dixon Ly [2013] NSWSC 906

Application of Malcolm Huntley Potier [2012] NSWCA 222

Ballard v Brookfield Australia Investments Ltd [2012] NSWCA 434

Brundza v Robbie & Co (1952) 88 CLR 171; [1952] HCA 49

Cameron’s Unit Services Pty Ltd v Kevin R Whelpton & Associates (Australia) Pty Ltd (1986) 13 FCR 46

Chang v Comcare Australia [1999] FCA 1677

Chen v Zhang [2009] NSWCA 202

Clark v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 13

Dugan v Mirror Newspapers Limited (1978) 142 CLR 583; [1978] HCA 54

Elip Pty Ltd v Arch Finance Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 752

Ford v Simes [2009] NSWCA 351

Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22

Gartner v Ernst & Young (No 3) [2003] FCA 1437

Gray v Motor Accident Commission (1998) 196…

Continue reading Mr D v Ms P

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Mr D v Ms P [2020] NSWCA 174
Case
[2020] NSWCA 174
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an appeal by Mr D against Ms P. Mr D sought leave to proceed with his appeal under the *Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981* (NSW) and also sought security for Ms P's costs of the appeal. Mr D was incarcerated and had been the defendant at first instance.

The Court was required to determine two primary legal issues. First, whether Mr D had established a prima facie ground for his appeal, thereby satisfying the criteria for granting leave under the *Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981* (NSW). Second, whether special circumstances existed to warrant ordering security for Ms P's costs of the appeal, given Mr D's incarceration and the fact that he would remain liable to Ms P for a significant sum regardless of the appeal's outcome.

Bell P granted leave to Mr D to institute appeal proceedings nunc pro tunc, finding that he had established a prima facie ground for the appeal. However, the Court also ordered Mr D to provide security for Ms P's costs in the sum of $25,000, payable in two tranches, or by way of an agreed alternative. This decision was made on the basis that Mr D's incarceration and the existing liability constituted special circumstances justifying the security order. The proceedings were listed for directions, with a potential dismissal order if the first tranche of security was not provided. Mr D was ordered to pay Ms P's costs of the motion for security for costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. To the extent necessary, grant leave nunc pro tunc to the Appellant pursuant to s 4 of the Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW) to institute appeal proceedings.

2. Pursuant to UCPR r 51.50(1), the Appellant is to provide security for the respondent's costs by paying into Court the sum of $25,000 or by way of charge over real property or in such other form as may be agreed between the parties which, if not provided earlier by way of charge, is to be paid in two tranches:

(a) as to $15,000 by 15 September 2020;

(b) as to the balance ($10,000) by the date set by the Registrar for the filing of the Appellant’s submissions.

3. The proceedings are listed on 21 September 2020 for directions before the Registrar, or, in the event that the first tranche of security has not been provided, an order for the dismissal of the proceedings pursuant to UCPR r 51.50(2A) may be sought.

4. The Appellant to pay the Respondent's costs of the Notice of Motion for security for costs.

5. No order as to costs of the Appellant’s Notice of Motion.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.