Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd v Scaffidi

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

FRENCH CJ,
HAYNE, CRENNAN, BELL AND GAGELER JJ

MONTEVENTO HOLDINGS PTY LTD & ANOR               APPELLANTS

AND

GIUSEPPE DIEGO SCAFFIDI & ANOR  RESPONDENTS

Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd v Scaffidi

[2012] HCA 48

7 November 2012

P22/2012

ORDER

1.Appeal allowed.

2.Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia made on 27 July 2011 and, in their place, order that:

(a)the appeal to that Court be dismissed; and

(b)Giuseppe Scaffidi pay the costs of Eugenio Scaffidi, Maria Scaffidi and Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd, including reserved costs, to be taxed if not agreed.

3.The first respondent pay the appellants' costs of the appeal to this Court.

On appeal from the Supreme Court of Western Australia

Representation

K A Vernon with A S Meysner for the appellants (instructed by Butcher Paull & Calder)

P E Cahill SC with C J Garde for the first respondent (instructed by Oldfield Legal)

Submitting appearance for the second respondent

Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.

  1. FRENCH CJ, HAYNE, CRENNAN, BELL AND GAGELER JJ.   Part of the background to this appeal is a long-running dispute between members of the Scaffidi family over the control of a trust called The Scaffidi Family Trust ("the trust").  The appeal concerns the proper construction of a clause in the trust deed governing the appointment of trustees.

  2. The second appellant, Eugenio Scaffidi, and the first respondent, Giuseppe Scaffidi, are brothers.  They are the only children of Antonio Scaffidi, who died on 29 August 2004, and the second respondent, his widow Maria Scaffidi, who is party to these proceedings by her guardian ad litem, the Public Trustee.  The second respondent has filed an appearance submitting to any orders made by the Court.  The first appellant, Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd ("Montevento"), was incorporated on 27 March 2007.  Since that date, Eugenio Scaffidi has been its sole director and shareholder.

  3. The trust was created by a deed of settlement dated 2 May 1977 ("the trust deed").  It is a discretionary trust designed to regulate the acquisition, management and disposal of assets of the Scaffidi family.  Giuseppe, Eugenio and Maria Scaffidi are all within the class of beneficiaries of the trust, and Eugenio Scaffidi is the appointor of the trust.

  4. This appeal concerns the proper construction of cl 11.03 of the trust deed, which provides that "[i]f, and so long as any individual Appointor is a Beneficiary that individual shall not be eligible to be appointed as a Trustee."  By a deed poll dated 18 February 2009, in his capacity as appointor, Eugenio Scaffidi appointed Montevento as the sole trustee of the trust.  On 19 April 2010, Giuseppe Scaffidi commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court of Western Australia against Eugenio and Maria Scaffidi and Montevento, seeking a declaration that the appointment of Montevento as the sole trustee of the trust was invalid because it breached cl…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd v Scaffidi and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] HCA 48
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The High Court of Australia heard an appeal from the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia concerning the validity of Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd's appointment as trustee of a discretionary family trust. The dispute arose because Giuseppe Scaffidi, an individual who was both an appointor and a beneficiary of the trust, argued that Montevento's appointment was invalid. The trust deed contained a specific clause, cl 11.03, which stipulated that an individual who was both an appointor and a beneficiary was ineligible to be appointed as a trustee.

The central legal issue before the High Court was whether a corporation, of which an individual appointor was the sole director and shareholder, was eligible to be appointed as a trustee of the trust, given the restriction in cl 11.03. This required the Court to interpret the meaning of "individual Appointor" within the context of the trust deed and determine if the restriction extended to a corporate trustee where the individual appointor held significant control. The Court also considered the distinction drawn within the trust deed between "individual" and "corporation" in other provisions.

The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the Court of Appeal. The Court reasoned that the trust deed clearly distinguished between an "individual" and a "corporation" in its provisions. Clause 11.03 specifically referred to an "individual Appointor" being ineligible to be appointed as a trustee. The Court found that Montevento, being a corporation, did not fall within the prohibition of cl 11.03, even though Giuseppe Scaffidi, an individual appointor and beneficiary, was its sole director and shareholder. The Court held that the restriction applied only to natural persons being appointed as trustees and did not extend to a corporate trustee controlled by such an individual. Consequently, Montevento's appointment as trustee was valid.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Appeal allowed.

2. Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia made on 27 July 2011 and, in their place, order that:

(a) the appeal to that Court be dismissed; and

(b) Giuseppe Scaffidi pay the costs of Eugenio Scaffidi, Maria Scaffidi and Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd, including reserved costs, to be taxed if not agreed.

3. The first respondent pay the appellants' costs of the appeal to this Court.

Background

Background to the litigation

The primary judge (EM Heenan J) dismissed Giuseppe Scaffidi's proceedings[1]. However, a majority of the Court of Appeal (Murphy JA and Hall J; Buss JA dissenting) upheld Giuseppe Scaffidi's appeal[2]. The Court of Appeal made orders which included a declaration that the appointment of Montevento as the sole trustee of the trust was invalid because it breached cl 11.03 of the trust deed, and required the appointment of a new trustee pursuant to the Trustees Act. By special leave, Eugenio Scaffidi and Montevento appeal to this Court.[1]Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd v Scaffidi Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] WASC 180.[2]Scaffidi v Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] WASCA 146.Facts The trust deed provides for the offices of trustee (cll 11 and 12), appointor (cl 13), and guardian (cll 14 and 15), described below. The class of beneficiaries of the trust is broad, and is defined in cl 1.04 by reference to the "Specified Members", Giuseppe and Eugenio Scaffidi. Clause 9 of the trust deed deals with the distribution of the trust fund to beneficiaries. The trust deed does not confer on any of the beneficiaries a vested interest in the capital or income of the trust fund. Instead, the trust deed grants the trustee a discretionary power, within some prescribed limits (including a requirement of consent of the guardian), to distribute capital or income in favour of one or more of the beneficiaries. Clause 10 of the trust deed sets out the trustee's powers in relation to the trust fund. The trustee has broad powers under the trust deed to deal with the investment and realisation of the trust fund. Clause 11 of the trust deed provides for the appointment and removal of the trustee. Clause 11.01 relevantly provides that "[a] trustee may be a corporation." Many of the provisions of the trust deed[3] distinguish between an "individual", meaning a natural person, and a "corporation" or "company"[4]. Clauses 11.02 and 11.03 provide:[3]See, for example, cll 10.03.04, 11.01, 11.05, 11.06, 12.04, 12.09.03, 12.11, 12.12, 13.05 and 14.03.[4]See Scaffidi v Montevento Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] WASCA 146 at [85]-[91] per Buss JA."11.02Subject to the provisions of this Deed the Appointor may by instrument in writing at any time and from time to time:11.02.01 remove any Trustee hereof;11.02.02appoint any additional Trustee or Trustees;11.02.03appoint a new Trustee or Trustees in the place of any Trustee who resigns his Trusteeship or ceases to be a Trustee by operation of law.11.03If, and so long as any individual Appointor is a Beneficiary that individual shall not be eligible to be appointed as a Trustee." Between 2 May 1977 and 16 August 1995, Scaffidi Nominees Pty Ltd ("Scaffidi Nominees") was the sole trustee of the trust. Scaffidi Nominees was incorporated on 27 April 1977. Giuseppe and Eugenio Scaffidi were its original directors, and Antonio and Maria Scaffidi were appointed directors on 3 May 1977. Antonio, Maria, Giuseppe and Eugenio Scaffidi all continued as directors until 10 May 2000, and there were no other directors during this time. Antonio, Maria, Giuseppe and Eugenio Scaffidi all held shares in Scaffidi Nominees.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

FRENCH CJ, HAYNE, CRENNAN, BELL AND GAGELER JJ (dissent)

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by:

Full text does not contain this section.