Mohareb v Palmer

Case [2016] NSWCA 378


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Mohareb v Palmer [2016] NSWCA 378
Hearing dates:29 November 2016
Decision date: 22 December 2016
Before: Beazley P; Meagher JA; Leeming JA
Decision:

1.   Appeal dismissed with costs, including the costs of the summons for leave to appeal;

 2.   Summons dismissed with no order as to costs.
Catchwords:

CRIMINAL LAW – perjury – primary judge dismissed application by appellant pursuant to the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 338(1)(c) to prosecute respondent for perjury – meaning of “false statement made on oath” – whether statement made by the respondent was false – allegation that the respondent had deliberately omitted material from an affidavit – whether an omission can form the basis for a charge of perjury

  COSTS – indemnity costs – award of indemnity costs made by primary judge – basis of award for indemnity costs – whether order of primary judge should be disturbed – whether indemnity costs should be ordered against the appellant for the costs of the appeal
Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
District Court Act 1973 (NSW)
Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW)
Cases Cited: House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40
Mackenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35
Michail v Mount Druitt and Area Community Legal Centre Inc [2015] NSWCA 396
Mohareb v Palmer (No 2) [2015] NSWDC 141
Mohareb v Palmer [2015] NSWCA 369
Moss v McIlveen [2011] NSWCA 77
Murphy v Farmer (1988) 165 CLR 19; [1988] HCA 31
Ollis v New South Wales Crime Commission [2007] NSWCA 311; (2007) 177 A Crim R 306
R v Liristis [2004] NSWCCA 287; 146 A Crim R 547
Sims v Wran [1984] 1 NSWLR 317
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Nader Mohareb (Appellant)
Matthew Palmer (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
In person (Appellant)
B Gelonesi (Solicitor) (Respondent)

  Solicitors:
In person (Appellant)
B Gelonesi (Respondent)
File Number(s):2016/97914; 2016/309194
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
District Court
Jurisdiction:
Civil
Citation:
Mohareb v Palmer (No 3) [2016] NSWDC 38
Date of Decision:
4 March 2016
Before:
Gibson DCJ
File Number(s):
2014/243522

Headnote

[This headnote is not to be read as part of the judgment]

The appellant was involved in defamation proceedings against the respondent and the respondent’s wife in relation to Facebook posts made on the Scotland Island Community Facebook Page. On 4 March 2016 the primary judge dismissed a notice of motion in which the appellant sought leave, pursuant to the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 338(1)(c), to prosecute the respondent for the offence of perjury.

The incident which formed the basis of the alleged perjury occurred on 23 April 2015. In March 2015 the parties had entered into an agreement that the proceedings would be discontinued within seven days of the respondents making an apology to the appellant and using their best endeavours to have the apology published on the Scotland Island Community Facebook Page.

A dispute occurred between…

Continue reading Mohareb v Palmer

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Mohareb v Palmer [2016] NSWCA 378
Case
[2016] NSWCA 378
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal concerned an application by the appellant, Mohareb, to prosecute the respondent, Palmer, for perjury. The primary judge had dismissed this application. The central dispute revolved around whether a statement made by the respondent in an affidavit constituted a "false statement made on oath" for the purposes of a perjury charge, specifically whether a deliberate omission of material from the affidavit could form the basis of such a charge. The appeal was heard by Beazley P, Meagher and Leeming JJA.

The legal issues before the Court of Appeal were twofold. Firstly, the Court had to determine the meaning of a "false statement made on oath" in the context of perjury, and whether an omission of material from an affidavit could satisfy this definition. Secondly, the Court was required to consider the primary judge's award of indemnity costs against the appellant and whether this order, along with the decision to dismiss the prosecution application, should be disturbed.

The Court of Appeal affirmed the primary judge's decision, holding that a deliberate omission from an affidavit, without any positive assertion that was false, did not constitute a "false statement made on oath" for the purposes of a perjury charge under the *Crimes Act 1900* (NSW). The Court reasoned that perjury requires a positive assertion of falsehood, not merely the withholding of information. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed. The Court also ordered that the appellant pay the costs of the appeal, including the costs of the summons for leave to appeal, while the summons itself was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Appeal dismissed with costs, including the costs of the summons for leave to appeal;

2. Summons dismissed with no order as to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.