DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Michael v Christiansen [2010] QDC 157
PARTIES:
MILTON MICHAEL
Applicant
AND
AARON ANTON CHRISTIANSEN
Respondent
FILE NO/S:
BD360/10
DIVISION:
PROCEEDING:
Originating application
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court, Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
22 April 2010
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
6 April 2010
JUDGE:
McGill DCJ
ORDER:
Order the respondent to pay to the applicant $12,750 compensation for the injuries suffered by the applicant as a result of the offence involving the applicant for which the respondent was sentenced in this court on 19 February 2009.
CATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL LAW – Compensation – assessment of compensation – whether applicant suffered mental or nervous shock
Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995
Ferguson v Kazakoff [2001] 2 Qd R 320 – followed.
Jullie v Atwell [2002] 2 Qd R 367 – cited.
MR v Webb [2001] QCA 113 – followed.
RMC v NAC [2009] QSC 149 – not followed.COUNSEL:
P. Sloane for the applicant
The respondent was not represented
SOLICITORS:
J.M.W. Legal for the applicant
The respondent was not represented
This is an application for compensation under the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (“the Act”). The Act has now been repealed, but the application was filed on 29 January 2010 and so is to be dealt with under the Act.[1] The respondent on 19 February 2009 was sentenced for offences including relevantly assault occasioning bodily harm in company committed on the applicant on 10 June 2007.[2] On that occasion the respondent and a co-offender[3] came upon the applicant outside a fast food restaurant, punched him and knocked him to the ground and apparently knocked him out and repeatedly kicked him. The applicant was subsequently taken to the Logan Hospital, and has no recollection of the assault; he recalls going to the fast food shop, and then waking up in the hospital. Once he recovered himself he became concerned about where he was and discharged himself and returned home.[4] He took two days off work but apparently continued to work thereafter.[5]
[1]Victims of Crime Assistance Act 2009 s 155.
[2]Affidavit of Wickman filed 29 January 2010, particularly Exhibit JMW-2 – sentencing remarks.
[3]The co-offender was dealt with in the Magistrates Court, so no issue arises about any claim against him: Affidavit of Wickman sworn 13 April 2010.
[4]Ibid Exhibit JMW-10 p 2.
[5]Affidavit of applicant filed 29 January 2010 para 9.
Physical injuries
Subsequently he attended a general practitioner, Dr Torbey, who provided a report to his solicitors on 9 October 2009.[6] That records that the applicant presented on 19 June 2007 complaining of headaches and back pain. On examination there were healing abrasions to the forehead and left shoulder, his back showed a good range of movement with some pain and tenderness to palpation of the spinous processes of the lower back and the paraspinal muscles. On 10 July 2007 he returned with a lump near the left eyebrow which Dr Torbey thought was a haematoma. His back pain had somewhat settled. X‑rays taken two days later reported no bony…
Continue reading Michael v Christiansen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Michael v Christiansen [2010] QDC 157
- Case
- [2010] QDC 157
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide whether Michael had indeed suffered mental or nervous shock as a result of the incident, and if so, the appropriate amount of compensation. This involved examining the evidence presented and determining whether the shock was a direct result of the incident in question and whether it was reasonable to award compensation for such injuries.
In its reasoning, the court found that Michael had indeed suffered mental and nervous shock as a result of the incident. The court considered the evidence presented, including expert testimony and the impact of the incident on Michael's life. The court also examined the guidelines for assessing compensation in cases involving mental or nervous shock, and determined that an award of $12,750 was appropriate. This decision was based on the severity of the shock experienced by Michael, the impact it had on his life, and the need for appropriate compensation.
The court ordered that Christiansen pay Michael $12,750 in compensation for the injuries suffered as a result of the incident in question. This order reflects the court's finding that Michael had suffered mental and nervous shock, and the appropriate amount of compensation for those injuries.
Orders
Orders of the court
Order the respondent to pay to the applicant $12,750 compensation for the injuries suffered by the applicant as a result of the offence involving the applicant for which the respondent was sentenced in this court on 19 February 2009.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.