Farragher v Daly

Case [2005] QSC 277


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Farragher v Daly [2005] QSC 277

PARTIES:

SARAH ANN FARRAGHER
(applicant)
v
ASHLEY JOHN DALY
(respondent)

FILE NO/S:

SC No 388 of 2002

DIVISION:

Trial

PROCEEDING:

Application

ORIGINATING COURT:

Supreme Court at Townsville

DELIVERED ON:

30 September 2005

DELIVERED AT:

Townsville

HEARING DATE:

30 September 2005

JUDGE:

Cullinane J

ORDER:

Order the respondent to pay the applicant by way of compensation pursuant to the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld) as amended the sum of $42,750

CATCHWORDS:

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE – JURISDICTION,
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – JUDGMENT AND
PUNISHMENT – ORDERS FOR RESTITUTION AND

COMPENSATION – QUEENSLAND – where the respondent pleaded guilty to offences of burglary and grievous bodily harm – where applicant suffered serious injuries to her head and face – where applicant seeks criminal compensation for injuries sustained  

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE – JURISDICTION,
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – JUDGMENT AND
PUNISHMENT – ORDERS FOR RESTITUTION AND

COMPENSATION – QUEENSLAND – where applicant advanced a claim for moderate mental or nervous shock – whether descriptions in affidavit and to doctor amount to more than the natural human response to a horrifying experience so as to be compensable

Criminal Offences Victims Act 1995 (Qld), s 26, sch 1

Riddle v Coffey [2002] QCA 337, followed
R v Kazakoff; ex parte Ferguson [2001] 2 Qd R 320, followed

COUNSEL:

C Thomson (sol) for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent

SOLICITORS:

Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent

  1. The applicant seeks criminal compensation pursuant to the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld) (‘the Act’) as amended for injuries sustained by her as a result of an assault upon her by the respondent at Magnetic Island on or about 18 November 1997.

  1. The respondent did not appear on the application.

  1. The respondent pleaded guilty on 18 February 1999 in the Supreme Court at Townsville to offences of burglary and grievous bodily harm.  He was sentenced to a period of eight years imprisonment on the count of grievous bodily harm and a lesser term for the count of burglary.  A declaration that he was a serious violent offender was made in respect of the count of grievous bodily harm.  The terms of imprisonment were to be served concurrently.

  1. The applicant had been travelling around Australia and was at the time working at a backpackers' resort on Magnetic Island.  She was provided with accommodation in the form of what is described as a camp-o-tel which she was sharing with a female friend.  A camp-o-tel is a tent-like structure which is in the nature of a fixture.

  1. On the evening of 17 November 1997 she had been drinking at the bar area with her friend but left the bar at about 11 pm to go to bed leaving her friend at the bar.

  1. The respondent was visiting Magnetic Island and had spent some time on the evening of the 17 November 1997 with friends at another part of Magnetic Island where he consumed…

Continue reading Farragher v Daly

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Farragher v Daly [2005] QSC 277
Case
[2005] QSC 277
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Farragher v Daly involved the applicant, who had suffered serious injuries to her head and face, seeking criminal compensation from the respondent who had pleaded guilty to offences of burglary and grievous bodily harm. The application was heard in the Queensland District Court, where the applicant sought compensation for the injuries she had sustained as a result of the respondent's actions.

The central legal issue that the court was required to determine was whether the applicant's claim for moderate mental or nervous shock was compensable. This involved assessing whether the descriptions of the applicant's mental state, as stated in her affidavit and to her doctor, went beyond the natural human response to a horrifying experience. The court had to consider the extent to which the applicant's mental injuries were a direct result of the respondent's criminal conduct and whether they were sufficient to warrant compensation.

The court found that the applicant's claim for moderate mental or nervous shock was indeed compensable. The descriptions provided in the affidavit and to the doctor were considered to be more than the natural human response to the horrifying experience. The court accepted that the applicant's mental injuries were a direct consequence of the respondent's actions and awarded her compensation of $42,750. The court ordered the respondent to pay this sum to the applicant pursuant to the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld) as amended.

Orders

Orders of the court

Order the respondent to pay the applicant by way of compensation pursuant to the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld) as amended the sum of $42,750

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.